Lol, ok. First of all, some of you have misinterpreted the meaning of the word AGAINST in that statement. Vertu and masterp, it meant, in the context
it was used, against as "compared to", not as "in going against." I could rephrase it as "BUT THE TIMING OF THE EVENT as compared to the timing
of YOUR THOUGHTS THAT I AM TRYING TO GET YOU TO SEE WITH THIS ARTICLE." I hope that makes the statement more readable.
From masterp: "...the event you thought happened at the same time as your thought actually happened earlier. It took a while for photons to
travel up to your eyes, the image to be processed, and the information to be matched by your brain."
masterp, what you are failing to realize is that what you just said further confirms what I am talking about. No doubt it must be an extremely
complicated process, beyond human ability, to coordinate such things exactly, down to the split second. And I mean exact second. With a pattern of
timing, too. The events I speak of occur consistently at the very end of either a thought or word. Not at the beginning, and not in the middle. And
eerily so.
AnnoMundi, nice post, thanks.
Herman:
1.) Something is ALWAYS happening around me. Some sound, somone coughing, a car driving by, a T.V. on...these events are always surrounding me.
Sure, if I were to say a word, there would obviously be an event to go with it because something is always happening. This is true for most people. Go
outside, you'll see or hear something happening all the time. In that house it interested me because that was a very quiet place.
I don't know, some of you people are looking at me like I am nuts and just sitting there next to my window or something looking for whatever sound or
noise I can find to confirm my thoughts. Hehe. Yup. Right. I am that stupid. To take up your time reading these dumb words. If it was a case of that,
do think I would have bothered with this thread? For what? The people that know what I am talking about, as some here have shown in their various
ways, understand exactly what I am talking about. And it can manifest itself, it appears, in two different ways. The first is instantaneously, like
the first post describes, and the second is afterwards, in some irrefutable way. Like elaine's polo horse event. Those happen plenty like that to me
as well.
And I suppose elaine's could tie in to visualization somewhat, and that may be what happened in her case. I don't know if any of you saw the thread
Visualization and the Bingo Hall Game, but if you liked this one, you'll probably like
that one too.
Herman:
2.) This one gets tricky when it comes to wording. You mentioned that while you were in the house, one of the reaction sounds was a car
passing, right? This means that there was a person in the car. That person drove past you just at the right time. Does this mean that they were a part
of it too?
Yes, of course they were a part of it. But not in the way you might be thinking. I am in no way suggesting that the car driver had a knowlege of it or
made it happen. They don't need to, because this force or power I am talking about takes care of it.
What I sense from these events is that whatever coordinates them, has such extreme power over everything, down to the last microsecond, and down to
the smallest piece of matter, that all events may be happening in a certain sequence, regardless of whether we are "tapped in" to it or not. And
when we do tap in, that we are merely becoming aware of this aspect of the sequence, and aligning our mind to it, for the time we are tapped in. Zoom
in, and boom, you see it. Zoom out, and you are thrust right back out into life, not paying attention, and all these events are just random.
Many people are so busy thinking that they are never even exposed to this, and that is my point with the thread. Exposure. The Akashic Record that has
been spoken of in various forms would tend to support this theory. It is the record of all things and events that have ever been, or that will be. Or
that are now. And regarding the "now moment," we cannot overlook this very interesting statement from dnero6911 in this thread:
There exists motion because of our nature of thought, now there exists time because of this motion, now, the falling point of us as humans is
following this motion instead of creating it. Does anyone understand this? There only actually exists the now, the present... there is actually never
a past or future, it all happened now.
I most certainly do understand it, and that was a friggin deep statement dnero. I really was like

when I saw that. The reason that statement makes
absolute sense to me is that the words
past, future, now are just words. Concepts. Human understandings of them. When it comes right down to
it, all we have is "this moment in time" to give any thought time to them at all. (Holy bejesus! At the exact moment I hit the period key to end
that statement, right here, right now, a very big boom just happened in the distance. In fact, it startled me. Deep breath. No sirens or screams. Ok.
Moving right along...Nope, wait. When that happens, I always go back and examine the statement made, because usually it is more accented than other
thoughts around it. Ok. Now, moving right along.......)
Back to the point, if there is no yesterday and there is no tomorrow, and there only is now, then it would stand to my reasoning that thoughts
contained in memory are just
interpreted as "memories of yesterday." And one then might say "well, I just EXPERIENCED yesterday, and I have
memories of it." Nuh, uh. You just experienced "now", and your interpretation of it today is that is happened yesterday. It very well could be true
what you have stated dnero, and all this sheds a new light, maybe, on the phrase "visions of the future." The process of visualization, and as
supported by my experience with it in the above mentioned thread link, completely supports your statement. Motion is caused by the very nature of
thought, and most people are caught up in all the manifestations, or motions, while never realizing that their very thoughts can affect the motions
that manifest for them. And in regards to synchronicity, a new phrase comes to mind: "synchronistic manifestion." Hmm, I better think on that a bit
more, lol.
Herman:
If so, it also means you're a part of something! Everytime you make a loud sound, does it mean that you made the sound because someone said or
thought something that caused you to make this sound?
Yes of course a part of something. As to every time I make a sound, not because of the reason you give, IMO. I believe it is because of that which has
extreme control over all things, and which is coordinating this "synchronistic manifestation." <<-- hmm, kinda has a ring to it.
Anyway, phew, long post, and sorry, but you people keep bringing up some amazing stuff here, and I love it.