John Titor, the Montauk Project, the e-Cat and Geometric Unity

page: 1
15
<<   2 >>

log in

join

posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 12:29 AM
link   
If you will bear through reading a few paragraphs, you will see a factual connection formed between some of the standard big name "conspiracy theories." I have linked to all source material, and it should make for an interesting and exciting investigation should anyone care to verify the facts.

Around the year 2000, John Titor shared a diagram of his supposed C204 time machine on the internet. In the C204 diagram you will see the outputs of positive, null and negative time fields. This is very interesting because the new theory of Geometric Unity also has those time fields corresponding to the future, present and past.

Here are the two Geometric Unity articles that appeared on the Guardian website just a week before they broke the Snowden story:

Eric Weinstein may have found the answer to physics' biggest problems

Roll over Einstein: meet Weinstein


However, Eric Weinstein is not truly the author Geometric Unity. This is a new conspiracy. Details developed below.

Titor said that micro-singularities would be discovered at CERN. Geometric Unity says the universe is inside a black hole from one perspective, but from another perspective the universe is only one elementary particle in a larger fractal cosmos. If the universe is inside a black hole and the universe is an elementary particle, then the idea of a micro-singularity follows directly.

The dates at the John Titor website are all meaningful events in the life of the author of Geometric Unity. (I am the author.)

John Titor Foundation


The dates near the turn of the millennium all correspond to my military service and the two outlying dates in 2009 correspond to the lectures I attended at Georgia Tech which inspired my model. I have listed the specifics here:

What do the dates at the JT Foundation mean to you?


Obviously my name is not Titor. However, there is another John on the internet who does have my last name that is also a supposed time traveller. (I don't want to post my real name in the forum, but I am the author of the scientific articles linked below.) There used to be a site online in 2004 or so called John {mylastname}'s time travel website but it is offline now. If I'm not mistaken it was a geocities site. Still... the other John that does have my last name is credited with helping Steven Gibbs build the hyper-dimensional resonator.

Here is an interesting article about the Montauk Project that also mentions a John with my last name.

PHOENIX UNDEAD: THE MONTAUK PROJECT AND CAMP HERO TODAY


What is interesting about that article is that it says the project moved from Montauk to Robins AFB in Warner Robins, GA in 1995. I moved from Tucson to Warner Robins in 1994 and graduated from high school there in 1998. Warner Robins is a small town and many people there know me as Jon.

Now the e-Cat. There is a rumor on the internet about a free energy device called the e-cat. On May 21 of this year there was a big story that the device had been tested and confirmed by some reputable scientists.

Rossi’s E-Cat Cold Fusion Reactor Validated by Third-Party Tests


The e-cat technology allegedly uses some unknown reaction to morph a special nickel powder into copper in the presence of a helium catalyst and this releases "LENR" energy. I am skeptical of the e-cat but I will explain why I believe it related to my story.

I briefly studied astrophysics at Georgia Tech, but then I had to switch to materials science. I worked in a lab that studied how materials respond to high-speed impact events. I worked on solids but many others in the lab worked on powder compacts and nickel was by far the most popular metal powder we studied. We had a large cannon in the lab that would shoot a projectile at the sample which would be destroyed and caught in a large catch tank.

The barrel of the cannon, the sample mount and the catch tank were all sealed against the outside atmosphere. If there was air inside the system, as the high speed projectile came down the barrel, it would ionize and trip all the sample diagnostics before the impact event happened. To avoid that we created a vacuum in the system, then launched the projectile at around 1,000 m/s with compressed helium. Helium is noble gas and very resistant to ionization.

Furthermore, because impact properties (high strain-rate properties) of copper are so widely known, the thing we would shoot at the sample was usually a copper cylinder or a flat piece of copper mounted on the end of an aluminum cylinder.

With our diagnostics we would study how the shock wave of the impact travelled through the sample, and then the sample fragments would be recovered from the catch tank and inspected using various microscopy methods. Extreme impact events create a very unusual type of alloying between the sample and the impactor.
This extremely rare and unusual alloying may have been mistaken for an unknown LENR reaction when in fact it was just the copper bullet hitting the nickel target at high speed. The traces of helium are from gas we used to shoot the projectile.

While I was working in the high strain-rate lab, I had independently continued my cosmology research. If my work leads to free energy, and a spy came to look at what I was working on at GT they may have dug one of our discarded samples out of the trash and not understood high-strain rate alloying. That work has zero to do with my independent research.

While doing that independent research at Georgia Tech I solved the major outstanding problem in physics. I was also very involved in the Occupy movement and I believe it is (partially) for those political reasons that I am not being given due credit for what is plainly evident in my research. Did anyone notice the story about how the FBI released details of a plot to assassinate the occupy leaders?

FBI Document—“[DELETED]” Plots to Kill Occupy Leaders “If Deemed Necessary”


Interesting about that: no one was ever charged. I am quite certain the greater scenario regarding those things -- and the other things I mentioned -- is why my research is being suppressed. This paper is non-scientific and gives the context of Geometric Unity and a loose familiarity with what is happening now. It gives the clear context of how the lectures I attended near the two 2009 dates at the JT foundation, (both with divergence 1.941) were integral to the development of Geometric Unity:

The Truth About Geometric Unity
edit on 23-8-2013 by sevensixtwo because: (no reason given)
edit on 23-8-2013 by sevensixtwo because: (no reason given)
edit on 23-8-2013 by sevensixtwo because: typos
edit on 23-8-2013 by sevensixtwo because: typos
edit on 23-8-2013 by sevensixtwo because: hopefully that was the last typo




posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 12:37 AM
link   
Unlike ordinary cranks ranting on the internet about how they have unified the fields, Geometric Unity has a unique experimental prediction which can verify it or rule it out. CERN was a big part of Titor's story and so it will be in mine. They are expecting that the Higgs-like particle discovered in 2012 will have spin-0, but if it has spin-1 that means Geometric Unity is correct. The theory's prediction is explained in my post above in the article called The Truth About Geometric Unity. Of course, I am all about the facts and will not ask anyone to take my word for it that I have actually made a mathematical breakthrough in fundamental physics.

A new interpretation of time leads to a connection between general relativity and quantum mechanics. Einstein's equations and the fine structure constant derived from one simple principle.

Tempus Edax Rerum


The 14D geometric model is presented in detail. (Note well, Geometric Unity is described as 14D in one of the Guardian articles linked in the previous post.) A flaw in the ADM positive-definiteness theorem is identified. A major outstanding issue in Kaluza theory is resolved.

Geometric Cosmology


The standard model of particle physics is shown to be a geometric property of the Geometric Unity cosmology. A unique experimental prediction is made.

Quantum Structure


The features of the theory are treated in a technical, yet qualitative way. A solution to dark energy is proposed.

Dark Energy in M-Theory


Here is the first paper I wrote. It is highly technical but non-mathematical and very short. If you have some familiarity with physics I hope it is understandable. I believe I wrote this on the timeline both Titors visited in 2009 with a divergence of 1.941.

Modified Spacetime Geometry Addresses Dark Energy, Penrose's Entropy Dilemma, Baryon Asymmetry, Inflation and Matter Anisotropy
edit on 23-8-2013 by sevensixtwo because: typos



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 01:46 AM
link   
CERN : C = E / R

edit on 23-8-2013 by R_Clark because: Grammar



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 02:17 AM
link   
John Titor has nothing to do with the hyper-dimensional resonator, Montauk Project, e-Cat or the Occupy movement ... ... nor did he visit in 2009... Yeah I hate seeing things like this latched to the John Titor story, it only muddles it up more!

John Titor is more of a scout soldier and not even a physicist. The only connection I see here is CERN in which can connect to millions of other things...


edit on 23-8-2013 by imitator because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 03:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by imitator
John Titor has nothing to do with the hyper-dimensional resonator, Montauk Project, e-Cat or the Occupy movement ... ... nor did he visit in 2009...


Well, dates in July and March 2009 do appear on the JT Foundation website. And the creator of the HDR, who is also mentioned in the article about Montauk, made at least one short list of people who could be John Titor.

JOHN TITOR A.K.A. RAZIMUS REPORT:

And I did move to Warner Robins in 1994. Seems like you're missing the big picture. Maybe you should admit that you don't already know everything that can be known. I certainly don't.



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 10:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by sevensixtwo

And I did move to Warner Robins in 1994. Seems like you're missing the big picture. Maybe you should admit that you don't already know everything that can be known. I certainly don't.


Your story about 1994 etc... has no connection to John Titor.

You have to be kidding if you believe anything from the RAZIMUS REPORT!!!!

All the info that comes from RAZIMUS is trash... the guy is a wannabe investigator... The guy claiming to be RAZIMUS even claimed himself to be John Titor!!! He then decided he's not JT and apologized publicly after getting threats lol... Your taking info from a known nut who is pissed because he can't pretend to be JT.


The Hoaxhunter himself was a hoaxter!!!

edit on 23-8-2013 by imitator because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 03:33 PM
link   
So among potentially revolutionizing physics and connecting it up to Quantum mechanics, you may also potentially be a younger version of the same John Titor that has yet to travel back in time using the developments and theory his younger self pioneered?

I seriously need to evaluate how I am spending my free time.
edit on 23-8-2013 by The 5th because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 04:29 PM
link   
It seems you are assuming that John Titor was real person who told a true story. That is an odd position to take given that there is no evidence of that and I do not take that position myself. The point I was trying to make is that there has been a breakthrough in physics consistent with the physics attached to the myth of John Titor. Then I tie some things together pointing out my connection to the Montauk Project and the dates at the JT Foundation.

Furthermore, because of connections to the Montauk Project and a foiled assassination plot against myself and/or others, my research was hidden for over a year. That changed when the Guardian recently broke the story, though they too do not mention me directly. As evidence that Eric Weinstein is not the author of the theory, I point out that there are no papers on it by Weinstein.
edit on 23-8-2013 by sevensixtwo because: (no reason given)
edit on 23-8-2013 by sevensixtwo because: typos
edit on 23-8-2013 by sevensixtwo because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 05:25 PM
link   
I have now downloaded all of your materials and have read-up on the titor story which I had heard of but never understood. I have found everything sofar to be fascinating.

ETA: I thought I would drop this diagram here. it is from a paper I wrote back in 2009. in particular, I would point out that, just as in your theory, I have independently conceived of the intersection of "time forward" and "time backward". so in other words, I like where yyou're going with this.



ETA2: i have read a bit more of your work now and, unless i am mistaken, the above diagram is a very good visual depiction of your overall theory, including the overlapping "bouncing" time frames which fall under the local coherence of the "observer". i really really like what you have done here.
edit on 23-8-2013 by tgidkp because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 06:45 PM
link   
There are a bunch of people sitting back having a laugh right now because you take their swindling and trolling serious...



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 08:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by tgidkp i have read a bit more of your work now and, unless i am mistaken, the above diagram is a very good visual depiction of your overall theory, including the overlapping "bouncing" time frames which fall under the local coherence of the "observer".


Yes, that is very cool! Share your paper. I ended up with a physical theory, but I started with metaphysical principle about consciousness. Here I have drawn the two halves as circles, but in the complete model the left side is scaled down by the inverse golden ratio and the right scaled up by the normal golden ratio. Then truly there is closer agreement with your diagram where the future is in some sense larger than the past. I just used the circles to exploit symmetry.




This is also the structure of the Mayan calendar. (Which looks a bit more like your diagram.)



Interesting about that, the 13x20 symmetry of the calender is also a symmetry of the model. I point that out in Geometric Cosmology. I wonder if the Mayans perhaps knew something about the unified field?
edit on 23-8-2013 by sevensixtwo because: (no reason given)
edit on 23-8-2013 by sevensixtwo because: added words



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 09:15 PM
link   
reply to post by sevensixtwo
 


not only do I wonder if the myans were aware of such a phenomenon, but this is not the first time I have used that drawing to help bring clarity to some type of complex information. I wonder if many people over the ages have had their own glimpse of this thing which you have (in my opinion) done a really great job of defining explicitly.

seriously, I would not have been able to understand your maths if I didn't have my own internalized version of that drawing to focus on. what is really interesting is that I have actually visited these spaces and observed their workings directly. so talking about it is like describing where you vacationed last summer. the maths made perfect sense.

I think your work is really neat and may make useful citation for me in the future. I should have posted in your science thread because I am not totally sold on conflating your research with the titor story. I can see how it is tempting to draw comparisons, tho.



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 10:05 PM
link   
I think the guy from the Thrive movement is pretty excited about that shape too. He describes it as a 2-torus where I describe it as a 3-sphere. It's a little known fact that a 3-sphere has a vortex in the center like a 2-torus. Not sure where he got the idea that the fundamental thing about nature was 3D though... since Nature is at a minimum 4D.


edit on 23-8-2013 by sevensixtwo because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 23 2013 @ 11:47 PM
link   
reply to post by sevensixtwo
 

from your "Dark Energy in M-Theory" paper:

When figure 7 undergoes parity conjugation around t* the diagrammatic structure of the universe is unchanged but t± → t(inverse±)∓. The physics of this asymmetry is that the spherical space defined on the hypermedian becomes a hyperbolic space on the meridian.


it is here at the threshold of spherical and hyperbolic space.... approaching the vortex "face-on", and then crossing through the vortex "sideways", that we can observe the continuity from 1D gravity to 2D electromagnetics resulting in 3D form. thus, as your friend insists, reality is fundamentally 3D. or what I have come to refer to as "innies" and "outies".

however, the connection of the outside of innies to the inside of outies via 4D (as per your descriptions) is obviously a more complete description.



posted on Aug, 24 2013 @ 09:25 PM
link   
When one looks at modern science today with respect to documentaries, in general articles in "science" and "nature" and in an altogether way. One can easily get the impression that time as a dimension is secondary to any modeling, but it is really not.

Could an 8 dimensional being occupy every point is space-time?

Could a ten dimensional being be aware of every choice in every potential universe?

As far as I know the answers to the two questions is yes.

Our Universe does seem part of a multiverse. In respect to that there is the matter of the electron cloud and those universes that are attached that way. But beyond that are the parallel, type/level universe's that are related to the expanse, beyond the physical territory of this "universe" (as in the one about 10X14 to the power of 28 meters from here.

In consideration to EPR Bridge and Bells theorem anything created at the same time is related despite distance. So what if that can be taken literally (for the sake of discussion).

This, meaning that those "universes" that were created at the same time as ours, exactingly parallel. But are a part of reality that is a part of this physical reality, outside the electron cloud are also part of the multiverse.

In relation to the Multiverse theory such "universe's" are a part of the multiverse. They are related to "us" in no different a way than the common perspective. In relation to the separations of sets of electrons as one level in perspective to the multiverse.

The OP is appropriate and to those who feel other wise? Consider taking the story of Flatland to another level.

So how would a 4D being represent itself in 3D?

Any thoughts?



edit on 24-8-2013 by Kashai because: Modifed content



posted on Aug, 25 2013 @ 01:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by sevensixtwo
I think the guy from the Thrive movement is pretty excited about that shape too. He describes it as a 2-torus where I describe it as a 3-sphere. It's a little known fact that a 3-sphere has a vortex in the center like a 2-torus. Not sure where he got the idea that the fundamental thing about nature was 3D though... since Nature is at a minimum 4D.


edit on 23-8-2013 by sevensixtwo because: (no reason given)


Cool diagram all things considered



posted on Aug, 25 2013 @ 01:53 AM
link   
If some higher dimensional thing was going to cover every point in lower dimensional manifold... Think about putting a ruler in bread box. The 3D bread box can cover every point of the 1D ruler if it is longer than the ruler, but otherwise it won't. It would hard for me to give specific answers to those other questions.
edit on 25-8-2013 by sevensixtwo because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 25 2013 @ 10:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by sevensixtwo
It seems you are assuming that John Titor was real person who told a true story. That is an odd position to take given that there is no evidence of that and I do not take that position myself. The point I was trying to make is that there has been a breakthrough in physics consistent with the physics attached to the myth of John Titor. Then I tie some things together pointing out my connection to the Montauk Project and the dates at the JT Foundation.


Actually your using Larry Haber as a reference or Walt Disney lol.

The JT Foundation has nothing to do with the original John Titor story, it is a website that is latched to JT story used for selling a book, and stealing the Titor story.

And to add "your breakthrough in physics connection." The science behind John Titor can be found way before JT posted online. However this doesn't discredit John Titor but maybe your story.



posted on Aug, 25 2013 @ 12:32 PM
link   
reply to post by sevensixtwo
 


Titor was a hoax.

The reason he "came back" was to "retrieve" a copy of Linux because Y2K had "broken everything" and civilization was collapsing.
* the "linux" he was supposed to retrieve was an operating system so old that it wouldn't run well on any of today's computers
* the "time travel machine" was doctored and cropped pictures of military surplus equipment.
* Staff and members here at ATS tracked him down (his address and real name) because he was posting here. I forget the details, but was in college (sophomore, maybe) at a community college and lived with his divorced mom and grandma.
* no alien, no time travel.

Hoaxer.



posted on Aug, 25 2013 @ 07:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by sevensixtwo
If some higher dimensional thing was going to cover every point in lower dimensional manifold... Think about putting a ruler in bread box. The 3D bread box can cover every point of the 1D ruler if it is longer than the ruler, but otherwise it won't. It would hard for me to give specific answers to those other questions.
edit on 25-8-2013 by sevensixtwo because: (no reason given)


How about it being a 3D cross section of itself in 4D.

Hypothetically speaking if one placed a 3D balloon through a 2D environment (case in point the Story of Flatland).

A hypothetical flatlander would see a circle appear, expand and then disappear. They would also be able to touch the circle, verifying its presence in their reality.

In relation to the other questions let me offers an idea....

Multiverse theory was originally postulated in relation to problems with Chemistry. The idea of the electron cloud, relates to sets of electrons "orbiting" the nucleus, each set corresponding to another Universe in the Multiverse.

Clearly there is a separation between these sets of electrons but that separation is not relevant in respect to the nucleus.

Meaning that in respect to this aspect of the Multiverse, the nucleus is constant throughout the spectrum of the separation of sets in the electron. This is the often common understanding of the multiverse, where in each separations while a person might be dead in one universe, they are alive in another.

The permutations could continue on as in one Universe a person is a Colonel in the military and in another he is a Doctor and so on...

So in relation to how these separate universes in the multiverse are correlated. The distance between these universes are correlated to distances related to the electron shell

Consciousness with respect to us as individuals could be understood from another perspective, this in relation to being a facet in a diamond. Of course there is more to this perspective and this is what I alluded to in my earlier posts.


The differences inherent to each universe in this aspect of the multiverse relating also to an orientation, relative to the whole.

Any thoughts?
edit on 25-8-2013 by Kashai because: Added and modifed content





top topics
 
15
<<   2 >>

log in

join