It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by beckybecky
reply to post by Pardon?
A very respected and eminent and honest doctor called Dr. Allen Levin says about this chemo.
“Most cancer patients in this country die of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy does not eliminate breast, colon, or lung cancers. This fact has been documented for over a decade, yet doctors still use chemotherapy for these tumors".
Dick Richards cites a number of autopsy studies which have shown that cancer patients actually died from conventional treatments before the tumor had a chance to kill them.
When very high doses of chemotherapy are used to kill cancer cells, these high doses can destroy the blood-forming tissue in the bones (the bone marrow). If very high doses of chemotherapy are needed to treat the cancer, bone marrow may be taken from the bones before therapy and frozen until it is needed. Following chemotherapy, the bone marrow is given back through a needle in a vein. This is called autologous bone marrow reinfusion.
To put it plainly, the treatment kills them before the cancer kills them. As a matter of fact, the chemotherapy drug 5FU is sometimes referred to by doctors as “5 feet under” because of its deadly side effects. For most adult cancers, the typical best case scenario is that the “Big 3” buys a little time. In a worst case scenario, you will die from the treatment rather than the disease.In his book.
Kenny Ausubel notes that in a trial on a chemotherapy drug tested for leukemia, a whopping 42% of the patients died directly from the toxicity of the chemotherapy drug!
After several years, some patients develop another form of cancer as a result of their treatment with chemotherapy and radiation.
According to Dr. John Diamond, M.D., “A study of over 10,000 patients shows clearly that chemo’s supposedly strong track record with Hodgkin’s disease (lymphoma) is actually a lie. Patients who underwent chemo were 14 times more likely to develop leukemia and 6 times more likely to develop cancers of the bones, joints, and soft tissues than those patients who did not undergo chemotherapy.
Yet, day after day, year after year, the CANCER INDUSTRY continues to put these toxic chemicals into the bodies of cancer patients. And the patients let them do it, even volunteering for new “guinea pig” studies, simply because someone with a degree from a school of disease (also known as medical school) told them it was their “only option.” It costs lots of money for them to poison the body of cancer patients, and the patients gladly pay it. Sadly, some people will spend six figures a year poisoning their bodies because their “doctor told them to do it.
This doctor won the lottery 60 times by diagnosing patients FALSELY with cancer.
A "cancer" patient "diagnosed by a crooked and fraudulent and evil doctor" is a living walking talking goldmine to be robbed of all his money and put 5 feet under after being killed by CHEMO.
because dead patients don't tell tales.
Originally posted by beckybecky
reply to post by James1982
Why don't you actually READ the article before making wild accusations against me?
Here it is straight from the horse's mouth by the ACTUAL doctors/oncologists in the field.
Read it carefully then read it again because you might forget what you read at the start by the time you reached the end.
Here it is:-
www.icnr.com...
Originally posted by Pardon?
Originally posted by beckybecky
reply to post by James1982
Why don't you actually READ the article before making wild accusations against me?
Here it is straight from the horse's mouth by the ACTUAL doctors/oncologists in the field.
Read it carefully then read it again because you might forget what you read at the start by the time you reached the end.
Here it is:-
www.icnr.com...
Strange that the paper is quoted on the International Centre of Nutritional Research's website (they always have really grandiose names don't they?) and strange that right next to the paper is a link for the CEO of the ICNR's book on how to beat cancer.
The book cites the usual nonsense "that there is only ONE cause" and that all the experts are wrong and only he knows the answer...."
Obviously there's also a link where you can buy this book too. At $34.50 it's a bargain!!!
Now how a dentist who runs a private clinic specialising in dental problems and "other health issues" is an expert on curing cancer is beyond me.
I can't find one verified case of his ever curing anyone (apart from a tooth abscess that is).
The list of case studies on that site is really interesting too.
Interesting in that not one of them offers any back-up to what they state.
Pure hockum.
But getting back onto the original paper cited as proof by yourself.
You still haven't understood it at all have you?
You really haven't a clue what the paper's results mean do you?
You are just regurgitating ad nauseam from your favourite anti-medicine sites aren't you?
You're hoping that if you bang on with the same thing over and over again people will have to believe you.
Well I won't. Certainly not with the "proof" you cite. It's garbage.
Originally posted by beckybecky
reply to post by James1982
why you are defending drug companies unless you happen to be on their payroll or you have been watching too many power point presentations or maybe they gave you free buffet with some beer and you feel eternally grateful.some people are bought very cheaply.
you are talking about relative percentages like drug x cured 1 % but drug cured 2% after messaging the figures so the relative success rate is 2/1 = 100% of drug y.
The fact is you need to look at the criminal behavior of these companies which you seem to be a slave to
o.HERE IS THE NEWS:-
........
how many other doctors are falsely diagnosing people with cancer to win the personal lottery?edit on 4-9-2013 by beckybecky because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Pardon?
Originally posted by beckybecky
reply to post by James1982
why you are defending drug companies unless you happen to be on their payroll or you have been watching too many power point presentations or maybe they gave you free buffet with some beer and you feel eternally grateful.some people are bought very cheaply.
you are talking about relative percentages like drug x cured 1 % but drug cured 2% after messaging the figures so the relative success rate is 2/1 = 100% of drug y.
The fact is you need to look at the criminal behavior of these companies which you seem to be a slave to
o.HERE IS THE NEWS:-
........
how many other doctors are falsely diagnosing people with cancer to win the personal lottery?edit on 4-9-2013 by beckybecky because: (no reason given)
And how many aren't?
I know which will be the far, far bigger number.
I'm not a fan of big pharma's activities but to cite their illegal activities as "proof" that a therapy is ineffective is ridiculous especially when there have been numerous independent studies confirming it's effectiveness.
Your shill gambit towards anyone who disagrees with you has grown very tiresome indeed.
You really do need to brush up on your debating skills if you wish people to take you more seriously. Personal attacks like that always means you've lost the argument.
You still haven't let us know your "method" either.
Or is that something we have to pay you for?
Originally posted by beckybecky
if they can pay billions in fines for bribery and corruption repeatedly then buying a few "independent studies" is child's play.
they can buy anyone with chump change and they have already done so as i explained already 80% of published research is fraudulent.
my "method" is in the public domain already and people who need can search for it.
i will even give YOU a clue.
it's called B---- E------------
Another name for it is T-- B--- P-------