Originally posted by beckybecky
if they can pay billions in fines for bribery and corruption repeatedly then buying a few "independent studies" is child's play.
they can buy anyone with chump change and they have already done so as i explained already 80% of published research is fraudulent.
my "method" is in the public domain already and people who need can search for it.
i will even give YOU a clue.
it's called B---- E------------
Another name for it is T-- B--- P-------
"IF they've done than then they COULD do that".
Just assumptions Becky.
Even worse that they are assumptions by association.
Therefore without any further evidence that ALL of the independent studies have been sabotaged then your argument is null and void.
You still haven't addressed the points about the Australian study you were wrong about.
You still haven't addressed the points about chaemo's 60% success rate either.
And then (I'm guessing) you're actually suggesting that the Beck Protocol works.
I'm more than happy to look at your proof of success here (I'm afraid testimonials don't count at all).
Oh, proof consists of a verified diagnosis of cancer, corroborating evidence of stage (blood work, X-rays, ultrasounds, MRI etc), concurrent therapy
(if any), Bob Beck therapy stages, evidence that the patient is free from cancer (blood work etc).
This is the one that uses distilled water, colloidal sliver, ozone(!), magnetic therapy and electrotherapy to cure, well everything it seems.
The usual claims are made suggesting it cures cancer, HIV, diabetes, flu, allergies, chronic fatigue, etc etc etc.
Instant and absolutely huge red flag.
The whole protocol is based upon the hypothesis that every disease and ailment is caused by "microbes".
So, with that statement alone, I'm confident that this hypothesis and therefore the therapy is ineffective.
With the exception of a few cancers which can be caused by viruses, the rest have nothing whatsoever to do with "microbes". If you're trying to
target something that isn't there then you're doomed to failure immediately.
Let's get on to the therapy itself.
Colloidal silver.....it's touted on websites as being an effective antibiotic, it's not. It's an anti-septic.
Silver is a good topical (outside the body) treatment for bugs but when ingested it has no effect whatsoever.
Therefore as a therapy for cancer via infection it is useless.
Now there has been some recent research that silver particles can be coated with appropriate chaemo drugs and target cancer cells but that's really
got nothing to do with this method.
Distilled water...Other than the "low conductivity" of distilled water I fail to see how this could benefit anything whatsoever.
The fact it's supposed to alter the conductivity of the blood is nonsensical. It won't unless you inject the water direct into one of your blood
vessels (please DO NOT do this, it would be BAD).
Blood is filled with electrolytic salts. This won't alter at all by drinking water.
Ozone therapy...This is supposedly a method of increasing oxygen in the body therefore leads to oxidation of baddies. This is incorrect on so many
levels as firstly, the only way to introduce more oxygen into your body is via the lungs. It cannot be introduced any other way (without being
extremely harmful). So that falls at the first hurdle.
Magnetic therapy...he talks about using kilogauss magnets "Externally applied magnetic resonance of lymph, spleen, kidney and liver helps
neutralize germinating, latent alien invaders and blocks re-infection. This quickens disease elimination, restores the immune system and supports
So an MRI scan could cure cancer then? Oh right, it doesn't does it?
Finally the electrotherapy...where do I start here?
It seems to be a re-hash of other methods, Hulda Clarke's "Zapper", the Rife etc which have both been shown to be completely ineffective at
treating any diseases at all. It cites research done by Drs Kalli and Lyman where they were able to destroy viruses using electricity in vitro and
devised a method to do this in vivo. Surprisingly, due to the severely invasive nature and potentially dangerous aspect of this, this therapy never
really got off the ground (they did actually patent it though).
It's alleged (with no evidence surprisingly) that different frequencies affect different cells and microbes.
They don't. Every living cell (including viruses) conduct electricity exactly the same way especially at the frequency ranges mention by Bob.
It's only when the frequencies get into the kHz and MHz ranges that cell damage starts to occur. This is because the frequency is to fast for the
cells to conduct so they dissipate the energy as heat. This kills ALL cells like when you cook a piece of meat..
This is the basis of radio-frequency ablation therapy.
So Becky, I've told you why this therapy doesn't and will never work.
What are your thoughts?