We'll soon get showered by a tsunami of space rocks from the Oort cloud as we approach the galactic

page: 2
9
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Aug, 2 2013 @ 02:12 PM
link   
reply to post by Blarneystoner
 


I assume that we all realize that Dark Matter and the Oort Cloud are hypothetical. Niether have ever been observed or detected in any way whatsoever.
A bit more than hypothetical. The observed movement of galaxies indicates that dark matter exists and comets come from somewhere.



Please GTF off of your high horses and stop belittling those who don't sit around eating Cheetoes all day browising the internet to correct those who are "wrong".
I don't eat Cheetoes though I do spend some time on the internet. It's not to correct people though, it's to learn stuff. Very often investigation of the claims on ATS leads to some real information that is actually interesting.



That fine website is filtered here at the office.
Shame on you. Browsing the internet on company time.
edit on 8/2/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)




posted on Aug, 2 2013 @ 02:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Blarneystoner
 

The Oort Cloud is not hypothetical and neither is dark matter. However, there're still some deeper mysteries to discover to fully explain dark energy/matter. I think the more correct way to say it is that all science is just consensus reality based on compiled evidence; it's not absolute truth. To say that dark matter/energy is hypothetical is to say that it doesn't rely on evidence and to put it the same league as Santa Claus or the tooth fairy.

I like your comment about how some people use ATS as a way to mentally masturbate. It's indulgence. They're picking the low lying fruit and love the feeling of correcting someone.
edit on 2-8-2013 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2013 @ 02:43 PM
link   
reply to post by jonnywhite
 


They're picking the low lying fruit and love the feeling of correcting someone.
"Low lying fruit" like this thread does not belong in a science forum. The sooner it rots the better. The OP has established himself as being beyond "correcting".
edit on 8/2/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2013 @ 02:46 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 

I agree, but don't deny there're peolpe out there that're indulgent about correcting others. It's a lot easier to pick on a nutty theory than it's to improve the real established ones. I think some people do get "addicted" to it and enjoy the burst of chemicals in their brain; it's just too plausible.

It reminds me of kids picking on other "nerdy" kids; you know, the easy targets.

Honestly, this would matter if an established theory was wrong and it was touted as right. Then we would have to correct it. But correcting crazy person #43059784 is indulgent, in my mind.
edit on 2-8-2013 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2013 @ 02:54 PM
link   
hi phlange,,


supernova remnant G1.9+0.3

www.nasa.gov...





It's still out there is see.



Me.

edit on 2-8-2013 by BobAthome because: (no reason given)
edit on 2-8-2013 by BobAthome because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2013 @ 03:02 PM
link   
reply to post by BobAthome
 


It's still out there is see.
How do you know? You have a really good telescope?
But there's no reason to expect it not to still be there.

What does it have to do with the topic though?
edit on 8/2/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2013 @ 03:06 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


I'd just stop now. This conversation just turns in to a loop of him admitting that it is a supernova remnant many LY away while at the same time claiming it's Nibiru.



posted on Aug, 2 2013 @ 03:11 PM
link   
Don't listen to Phage, but listen to Hendrix?
There's a time and place for such advice.
This isn't it.



posted on Aug, 2 2013 @ 03:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by Phage
 


I'd just stop now. This conversation just turns in to a loop of him admitting that it is a supernova remnant many LY away while at the same time claiming it's Nibiru.


supernova G1.9----went boom

supernova remnant---- G1.9+0.3

see the difference,,,and as far as there goes,,where might be there now?,,as it is a moving remnant of a supernova,,which may contain in my opinion a piece of "dark Matter".
thats it.
no big deal,,
and where is the inconsistancy in my theory?



posted on Aug, 2 2013 @ 03:17 PM
link   
The Oort cloud may be hypothetical, but all those comets must have formed somewhere. They can't just pop into existence and promptly make their way here.

Especially if the OP insists that comets are entirely rocky bodies, it would take a thick disc of material around a star to allow them to form. Ergo, comets form in star systems like our own Solar System. Either comets formed on the outskirts of the system, where the material was too thin to form planets, or they formed closer to the Sun and then migrated out due to gravitational tugs from the planets.

And by the way, there are four known objects with orbits which suggest that they may belong to the Oort cloud: 90377 Sedna, 2000 CR105, 2006 SQ372 and 2008 KV42. en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Aug, 2 2013 @ 03:29 PM
link   
reply to post by wildespace
 


There are other theories... Dark Matter, Missing Planets new Comets

Use Google scholar search.

...another thing I find hard to believe is that Phage does not eat Cheetoes.
edit on 2-8-2013 by Blarneystoner because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2013 @ 03:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by AndyMayhew
reply to post by Blarneystoner
 


So we don't need worry about imaginary massive iron comets from the hypothetical Oort cloud hitting the Earth next week due to us not crossing the Galactic Plane


Thread closed?


You can't have it both ways... they're either Iron bodies that originated from the inner solar system or they're icy bodies that came from the imaginary Oort cloud.... pick one or the other.



posted on Aug, 2 2013 @ 03:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by BobAthome
 


It's still out there is see.
How do you know? You have a really good telescope?
But there's no reason to expect it not to still be there.

What does it have to do with the topic though?
edit on 8/2/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)


lol... how do you know the Oort cloud is out there? Do you have a really good telescope too?



posted on Aug, 2 2013 @ 03:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Blarneystoner
 


how do you know the Oort cloud is out there

You sort of missed the point but I don't "know" it's there.
But comets with certain orbital characteristics have to come from somewhere? A cloud of objects would fit that evidence quite well.

But maybe you should address your question to the OP since the Oort cloud is essential to his...idea.
edit on 8/2/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2013 @ 04:06 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


No... I didn't miss the point. I've already said that I agreed with your assesment in my first response to you but you were so concerned with making sure I knew I was wrong that you missed it.

..go back to your Cheetoes now.



Have a good weekend...



posted on Aug, 2 2013 @ 04:09 PM
link   
You forgot to add
-MASSIVE NUCLEAR ELE ALIEN ROCKS-
in your thread title!
A sheer wonder i clicked at it



 
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
 



posted on Aug, 2 2013 @ 06:56 PM
link   
If anything has been recently bumped
from the Oort cloud remind me in about
9,000 years to take shelter.



posted on Aug, 2 2013 @ 08:13 PM
link   
this is official NASA statment : if asteroid hit earth ..PRAY...

realy strange..maybe something big outhere to come..



posted on Aug, 2 2013 @ 08:18 PM
link   
if you want this is meteor shower month..
Earth is entering a broad stream of
debris from comet 109P/Swift-Tuttle,
source of the annual Perseid meteor
shower . Although the shower won't peak
until August 12-13, when Earth hits the
densest part of the stream, the first
Perseids are already arriving. "Despite
poor weather over our network of meteor
cameras , we have detected six Perseid
fireballs since July 30th," reports Bill
Cooke, head of NASA's Meteoroid
Environment Office.
,
The shower is just getting started. Rates
should remain low for the next week as
Earth penetrates the sparse outskirts of
the debris stream, then skyrocket to
~100 meteors per hour as the calendar
turns to the second week of August. Stay
tuned for more fireballs.

source : spaceweather.com



posted on Aug, 2 2013 @ 08:48 PM
link   
The most effective way to learn is not to be told everything, but for others to think for themselves to put the whole picture together. I've given most, but not all the details.

Think angles and other belts of rock.

I'm surprised no one mentioned Dr. Ray Brown.

Keep watching. Even though they'll keep data classified on the real hazardous rocks out there.

www.g4fui.net...





new topics
 
9
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join