It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Aug. 1, 2013 — A University of Colorado Boulder team has developed a radically new technique that uses the power of sunlight to efficiently split water into its components of hydrogen and oxygen, paving the way for the broad use of hydrogen as a clean, green fuel. The CU-Boulder team has devised a solar-thermal system in which sunlight could be concentrated by a vast array of mirrors onto a single point atop a central tower up to several hundred feet tall. The tower would gather heat generated by the mirror system to roughly 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit (1,350 Celsius), then deliver it into a reactor containing chemical compounds known as metal oxides, said CU-Boulder Professor Alan Weimer, research group leader. As a metal oxide compound heats up, it releases oxygen atoms, changing its material composition and causing the newly formed compound to seek out new oxygen atoms, said Weimer. The team showed that the addition of steam to the system -- which could be produced by boiling water in the reactor with the concentrated sunlight beamed to the tower -- would cause oxygen from the water molecules to adhere to the surface of the metal oxide, freeing up hydrogen molecules for collection as hydrogen gas. "We have designed something here that is very different from other methods and frankly something that nobody thought was possible before," said Weimer of the chemical and biological engineering department. "Splitting water with sunlight is the Holy Grail of a sustainable hydrogen economy." A paper on the subject was published in the Aug. 2 issue of Science. The team included co-lead authors Weimer and Associate Professor Charles Musgrave, first author and doctoral student Christopher Muhich, postdoctoral researcher Janna Martinek, undergraduate Kayla Weston, former CU graduate student Paul Lichty, former CU postdoctoral researcher Xinhua Liang and former CU researcher Brian Evanko. One of the key differences between the CU method and other methods developed to split water is the ability to conduct two chemical reactions at the same temperature, said Musgrave, also of the chemical and biological engineering department. While there are no working models, conventional theory holds that producing hydrogen through the metal oxide process requires heating the reactor to a high temperature to remove oxygen, then cooling it to a low temperature before injecting steam to re-oxidize the compound in order to release hydrogen gas for collection.
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
How efficient is it then? I noticed that the source article doesn't mention 'efficient' at all. How much can be produced per acre , speed of peroduction, what's the initial outlay , the running costs, material wear and tear, and the costs for collecting?
edit on 1-8-2013 by PhoenixOD because: (no reason given)
We show that these temperature swings are unnecessary and that isothermal water splitting (ITWS) at 1350°C using the “hercynite cycle” exhibits H2 production capacity >3 and >12 times that of hercynite and ceria, respectively, per mass of active material when reduced at 1350°C and reoxidized at 1000°C.
Originally posted by canDarian
This is definitely going change things.
So this is solar power which just happens to be stored in the form of the chemical potential energy of Hydrogen?
I wonder how much water can be removed from our somewhat delicate ecosystem before it's thrown off balance.
Originally posted by Phage
Hydrogen storage can be problematic though.
Originally posted by canDarian
The tower would gather heat generated by the mirror system to roughly 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit (1,350 Celsius)
Originally posted by DupontDeux
Originally posted by canDarian
This is definitely going change things.
I don't know how awesome this really is - I wonder how much water can be removed from our somewhat delicate ecosystem before it's thrown off balance.
I mean, if the destruction of water molecules became the next oil refinement and if it became the fuel of choice for 7 bn - soon to be 12 bn - people, then, well, then I'm not to comfortable with that.
Sure there is loads of water but unlike oil it's all part of the hopefully never ending cycles of the ecosystem.
Thoughts?
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by pheonix358
Except, of course, for the rather large facility to produce it and the system to distribute it.