It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Bluesma
Originally posted by sine.nomine
Originally posted by Bluesma
...The woman could not stand and walk, and she is going to be able to go get a gun, and shoot it accurately???
...or else is the suggestion that one should always have a gun in hand. t all times?
Seconds really make a difference in situations like this, and a 2-second scramble to a hidden gun in a wall compartment could most definitely change the outcome. Especially when those weapons are strategically placed where attackers are bottlenecked through a single target area. I realize different situations call for different measures, but certainly having those options couldn't hurt your chances, am I wrong?
What was your solution again?
Oh, I have not a "solution". I think life has dangers as part of it, and there is no sure way to avoid dangers from happening. I have guns, we have done what we think is possible within limits of safety, to make them available.
But by no means do I consider that absolute security and that anyone who is attacked, killed, or robbed could have avoided that by having a firearm.
Being asked, I would say, she didn't have much of a chance to get a firearm in time, make sure the security was off, and fire it accurately. It would have to be not loaded, as there are children in the house, so that would have to be done too. That a child was present in the room, it would be best if she fired before having been hit and stunned, so that there is less chance of her killing the child by mistake. In this case, she had some injuries, and the child is fine. In an alternate scenario, the kid could be dead as well.
But they lost some "stuff"- which is not a big deal to me. But to others, a childs well being might be on equal footing in value, I don't know.
I would suggest she should have had a lifetime of learning self defense- martial arts, perhaps boxing. This sort of training inscribes automatic reflexes in the body that can emerge in such moments even when taken by surprise, and become valuable.
Originally posted by sonnny1
I responded to it because you implied he was 13, trying to "insult" him in some way.
Cause one insult with another is classy...
My response was to show you that there are teens that know how to use firearms, in precarious situations.
Its also common for folks to ask "who is it" before opening the door. I didn't see that happen in this video.
Originally posted by sine.nomine
So martial arts is your answer? Did you see the size difference in this altercation?
Lets keep in mind here what we are both saying. What are you really arguing against here? What did I reference that has you attacking my opinion?
I just don't see how having defensive measures could hurt your chances, that's all..
Originally posted by StrangeTimez
Originally posted by SeenAlot
Doubting Thomas here:
1st- this looks more like a boyfriend beating than a home invasion, she's quiet and that's just a big red flag for me.
2nd-why'd Hubby have the camera up in the first place?
3rd-why didn't Mr. HomeInvasion take the camera? If its a nanny cam, please see above two statements
Are you mental?? Who cares if it was a boyfriend or home invasion?
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Originally posted by SeenAlot
That doesn't negate the boyfriend theory.
Just first impressions.
When I saw this on the news that's exactly what I said outloud "they don't know who this is? It's obviously her boyfriend."
Why have a nanny cam for a nanny when the woman is at home during the day? And you don't just leave a nanny cam running 24/7 for no reason, you only have it on when the nanny is around. Hence it's a nanny cam.
She probably got beat, her husband came home and she said she didn't know who it was even though she in all probability does.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Originally posted by StrangeTimez
Originally posted by SeenAlot
Doubting Thomas here:
1st- this looks more like a boyfriend beating than a home invasion, she's quiet and that's just a big red flag for me.
2nd-why'd Hubby have the camera up in the first place?
3rd-why didn't Mr. HomeInvasion take the camera? If its a nanny cam, please see above two statements
Are you mental?? Who cares if it was a boyfriend or home invasion?
Her husband