It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by InverseLookingGlass
reply to post by Rezlooper
More Guns wouldn't and didn't help native Americans do anything except commit suicide with more flourish. Maybe that's a conservative thing too? How about reading history instead of indulging your sick fetishes?
Originally posted by Rezlooper
Originally posted by InverseLookingGlass
reply to post by Rezlooper
More Guns wouldn't and didn't help native Americans do anything except commit suicide with more flourish. Maybe that's a conservative thing too? How about reading history instead of indulging your sick fetishes?
So let me get this straight...We Natives were committing suicide with less flourish prior to the arrival of guns? What the hell kind of statement is that?
Originally posted by Indigo5
Originally posted by Rezlooper
This billboard is only in Greeley, CO, and a local professor/Native American, who heads the Ethics department at a local university came out complaining that it is offensive to her Native American heritage. How? Obviously, this professor is a liberal anti-gun Obama supporter who would rather see the guns taken away. She was only upset because the billboard speaks volumes of truth...
Seeing as you seem to be confused on this Professors area of study...you don't appear to have actually read any of her concerns? And then you go on to explain what her beliefs are?
She is a Professor of Ethnic studies...not Ethics...BTW
And instead of telling us "Obviously, this professor is a liberal anti-gun Obama supporter "..
Why not read her concerns?
Irene Vernon, a Colorado State University professor and chairwoman of the ethnic studies department, said the message on the billboard is taking a narrow view of a much more complicated history of the Native American plight. She said it's not as if Native Americans just gave up their guns and wound up on reservations.
"It wasn't just about our guns," said Vernon, a Native American.
Greeley resident Maureen Brucker, who has worked with Native American organizations and who frequents the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota as an honorary family member, said she thinks the billboards are making light of atrocities the federal government committed against Native Americans.
She said the billboard brings to her mind one of the most horrendous examples of that, the Wounded Knee Massacre on the Pine Ridge Reservation in 1890. Historical accounts say the 7th Cavalry had detained a band of Native Americans and asked them to give up their weapons. Troops began firing after a shot rang out. Death toll estimates of Native American men, women and children range from 150 to 300.
Brucker said she thinks those who put up the billboards should come forward and to discuss their viewpoints.
"I thought it was pretty cowardly that someone would put something like that up and spend the money for a billboard but didn't have the courage to put their name on it," she said.
www.denverpost.com...
I agree...
The idea that the American Gov. confiscated guns CAUSE
American Indians oppressed and suffering EFFECT
Is FALSE...
It dismisses a noble resistance over the years...
And the number of weapons the American Indians had played no part in the result...
And the fact that thier heritage is used as a prop by people to cowardly to put thier name on the campaign compounds the insult.
No one can speak for the Native Americans, but them IMO..edit on 1-5-2013 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Galvatron
Originally posted by gambon
reply to post by Bearack
Or the tanks , rockets and ak clones would have been turned on the crowd and thousands more dead
do you really think a well armed militia could take on a profesional military in the c21?
?
Yes. Are you unaware of the conflict in Afghanistan? What about Libya? What about Syria? What about South Ossetia? What about the Yugoslav Civil War? Do you believe that the people in these areas are not able to resist modern militaries? Would they be more effective with missiles, artillery, tanks, planes etc? They sure would. However, the modern small arm is precisely why these people were able to or are able to project credible force. Regardless of right or wrong, good or bad, modern small arms give people this that power.
Do you think the Taliban would be in control of the Afghan countryside if it weren't for their access to modern small arms? Do you think coalition forces there would have such a tough time? In the 80s the afghans effectively resisted the soviet union, armed mainly with WWII era Lee-Enfield bolt action rifles.
To suggest that a well armed militia can't take on a modern military is to not only ignore military history, but to ignore contemporary history as well. Considering the structure of our government and the demographics of our military, one must consider that a very large proportion of our own military would rather side with the people than with the government. The armed militia is in case the military doesn't fracture, and if it does, then the armed militia, combined with the fractured military that side with the people, ought to be enough to dismantle the government and start fresh.
Originally posted by muse7
Pointless billboard as no one is even asking anyone to turn in their guns.
And yes I am pro-background check
Pro-only letting law abiding citizens be able to buy guns
And pro-closing any loopholes that enable criminals to bypass a background check in order to buy a gun.
Originally posted by gambon
reply to post by Bearack
haha funny how you use stats picked from the uks most leftist broadsheet paper
And you do realise that statistics have to be weighted to be any use whatsoever , this isnt mean, median or mode calculations .Or anything as simple as averages.
The fight for independance was won with help from france
the mujahideen are fighting in a whole country not a city square..slight difference there.
And America lost the v war , the Nvietnamese didnt really win , you gave up.
yugoslav civil war fought by groups as well armed as any army .
the mujahidden were loosing badly against the russian untill the cia provided them with arms , especially stinger missiles via IRAN ..do you remember tyhat?
edit on 1-5-2013 by gambon because: (no reason given)
H. Con. Res. 331 was passed in October 1988 to acknowledge the contribution of the Iroquois Confederacy of Nations to the development of the United States Constitution, and to reaffirm the continuing government-to-government relationship between Indian tribes and the United States established in the Constitution. Congress, on the occasion of the 200th anniversary of the signing of the United States Constitution, "acknowledged the historical debt which this Republic of the United States of America owes to the Iroquois Confederacy and other Indian Nations for their demonstration of enlightened, democratic principles of government and their example of a free association of independent Indian Nations."
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Rezlooper
Are the American Indians pro gun control? I didn't know that. I do know the Democratic National Convention trotted them out with flags as a show off that they have Indians in their corner as a voting bloc. And who would have ever guessed that? Lame Cherry blog talked about the Indian connection with the casinos and how white politicians were completely crooked about it.
But it really makes sense for indigenous peoples to be whatever the Power Elite wants them to be as the UN has recruited them as being the downtrodden finally rising up. This is more Marxism of course, as the billboard clearly shows, the govt lies and the people die.
Originally posted by TauCetixeta
Stossel did a episode on the American Indians.
The U.S. Government threw free money at them and that took away the desire to
make money on their own.
BTW, i see you have very few flags.
Originally posted by TauCetixeta
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Rezlooper
Are the American Indians pro gun control? I didn't know that. I do know the Democratic National Convention trotted them out with flags as a show off that they have Indians in their corner as a voting bloc. And who would have ever guessed that? Lame Cherry blog talked about the Indian connection with the casinos and how white politicians were completely crooked about it.
But it really makes sense for indigenous peoples to be whatever the Power Elite wants them to be as the UN has recruited them as being the downtrodden finally rising up. This is more Marxism of course, as the billboard clearly shows, the govt lies and the people die.
Stossel did a episode on the American Indians.
The U.S. Government threw free money at them and that took away the desire to
make money on their own.
BTW, i see you have very few flags.
Kind of tough to make your own money when your land has been taken from you and her natural resources
Please read the thread. Everything you said has been, for the most part, adequately refuted. The Native Americans were wiped out for a myriad of reasons, fireapower being way way down on the list.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by Galvatron
Please read the thread. Everything you said has been, for the most part, adequately refuted. The Native Americans were wiped out for a myriad of reasons, fireapower being way way down on the list.
Don't think so the Native American's feel prey to a superior military force that was better armed.
Should sound familiar since the cops,and the military all have better weapons than us little people.
1/3 Cherokee here
temporary political concessions played a much much larger role