It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration’s announcement that it planned to question the Boston Marathon bombing suspect for a period without first reading him the Miranda warning of his right to remain silent and have a lawyer present has revived a constitutionally charged debate over the handling of terrorism cases in the criminal justice system.
Originally posted by bekod
reply to post by ownbestenemy
Not when it comes to being classified as a terrorist read the NDAA and the P you lose that right or the US GOV by choice can suspend that as was said last night by the US DA, so if you do not commit a terrorist act, you still have the right to remain silent.
Originally posted by bekod
reply to post by ownbestenemy
Not when it comes to being classified as a terrorist read the NDAA and the P you lose that right or the US GOV by choice can suspend that as was said last night by the US DA, so if you do not commit a terrorist act, you still have the right to remain silent.
Originally posted by andy1972
I posted this in a thread about 8 hours ago, hes being treated as a prisoner of war, so he has no miranda rights.
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
Originally posted by andy1972
I posted this in a thread about 8 hours ago, hes being treated as a prisoner of war, so he has no miranda rights.
Have any sources to that? They have, from everything I read are steering clear of declaring him an enemy combatant.
Should help shape the debate better.