It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by waynos
reply to post by htapath
So it's obvious, but not so obvious that you can elucidate on it. A chemmie asked for an explanation tries to look mysterious and wise by typing nonsense. Yadda yadda yadda, heard it all before
Originally posted by htapath
Originally posted by waynos
reply to post by htapath
So it's obvious, but not so obvious that you can elucidate on it. A chemmie asked for an explanation tries to look mysterious and wise by typing nonsense. Yadda yadda yadda, heard it all before
A quick look at the sky is all that is required at my location. Presently, there is a perfect grid laid out over this area. It's one thing to bury your head in the sand, but your head is somewhere else entirely.
Good luck with that strategy, and have a nice day.
Another point that needs to be understood is that there is a logical explanation for the checkerboard patterns often seen in the sky that does not necessarily support the conclusion that they are evidence of chemtrail spraying. There usually are significant movements of air at the altitudes where chemtrails appear. Let us assume that the wind is blowing at 30 miles per hour and that it is moving at 90 degrees to the direction of flight. Let us also assume that there is a new flight that moves along the same path every fifteen minutes, which is not unusual in heavily traveled flight paths. In that case, the trail left by a plane will be blown sideways by 7.5 miles by the time the next plane arrives along the same path. That creates two parallel trails 7.5 miles apart. When the third plane arrives along the same path, the wind will cause three parallel trails, and so on. The casual observer might conclude that three planes have traversed the sky parallel to each other or that the same plane flew back and forth in different sectors of the sky but, in truth, there were three planes following each other along the same flight path.
Now let's assume that the wind is blowing at 45 degrees to the direction of these planes and that their flight path is intersected by another flight path for planes traveling at 90 degrees to the first flight path. This, also is common. Of course, the two paths are separated from each other by a substantial difference in altitude but, to an observer on the ground, it may appear that they are at the same altitude.
If we imagine that the planes in the second flight path also are flying one after the other, we can see that they, too, will leave parallel trails but they will be at 90 degrees to the first set of parallel trails. The result will be a checkerboard in the sky that looks like the planes flew back and forth at various points but, in truth, the pattern can be created by multiple planes flying only two stationary paths that intersect each other.
You cannot just "debunk" something based on how observers react on it. That is not denying ignorance.
It's one thing to bury your head in the sand, but your head is somewhere else entirely.
Proving which planes are is close to impossible obviously from the stories told of this being a "black ops" type operation.
The debunkers know facts huh? You have yet to post one single salient fact IMO.
Originally posted by SMOKINGGUN2012
You act like you are Gods dedicated gift to the debunking chemtrails forum. The debunkers know facts huh? You have yet to post one single salient fact IMO.
You act like you are Gods dedicated gift to the debunking chemtrails forum.