Tree bombs to reforest the earth, page 4


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 64 times


reply posted on 22-3-2013 @ 11:01 AM by auto73912621
reply to post by purplemer



I see this whole idea as a moot point. Thanks to our "devastation" of the natural world, it's actually getting greener and wetter! PLEASE watch this video!

criticality.org...


reply posted on 22-3-2013 @ 11:30 AM by TrueBrit
reply to post by auto73912621




While it may be the case that the earth is getting wetter and greener as a nett measure, it is also the case that land which is populated by subsitance farmers is getting desertified. No matter which side of the fossil fuel debate you sit on is rather less important, than ensuring that land which has been farmed for generations, can actually continue to provide resources for people to live on. Wether those resources are the food that was farmed there previously, or the grazing that used to happen to excess, or the hydro electrical benifits that healthy land can give a region (as in some of the examples in the Green Gold video).

The amazon getting greener is all very well, but logging DOES threaten the process of which Matt Ridley speaks. Areas of Africa getting greener is all very well, but unless the constant over grazing and slash and burn tactics stop, that process will mean nothing to the famine hit regions of Africa.

Also, the video you posted says nothing of note about the other unfortunate side effects of over reliance on fossil based energy, namely disasters involving spills, improper saftey at drill sites, poisoning of watercourses by fracking, and the acidification of seas and lakes, disasterous for sea and water borne life. Yes, more carbon means greener plants, and larger ones. But these things alone do not constitute the all clear to continue behaving stupidly with our energy production techniques. China may have a region or two where progressive environmental systems are being developed, but its smogs are not caused by mere dust from the desertified regions, but by huge amounts of irresponsible industrial process which, apart from anything else, cause harm to millions of people every year, let alone the possible environmental consequences.

A measured mixture of planet husbandry, and industrial and technological input, is the only logical route forward. We should combine the understanding we have at our disposal of the planet, and the availability of science and industry for the betterment of all, and thats what these seed pods represent. They also represent a possible way to begin terraforming other planets at some stage, assuming we find one which could be habitable.


reply posted on 22-3-2013 @ 12:21 PM by Redfreak
reply to post by Celestica


Ya but.....doesn't the ground need to be worked up, adding nutrients (manure and what have you), so that it can soak up moisture? Talking about deserts of course.


reply posted on 22-3-2013 @ 01:59 PM by Hopeforeveryone
reply to post by Rubic0n



I'm not really buying the whole concept. An arms manufacturer puts this plant bomb idea out there fourteen years ago and guess what - they didn't follow through. It's a public relations exercise from a company that makes weapons ! Please don't be so naive as to think this was ever a real project.


reply posted on 23-3-2013 @ 08:48 AM by charlyv
Originally posted by TrueBrit
reply to
post by charlyv



You would need the little bubble to install a sapling, because the sort of winds you get in desertified regions are strong and unimpeded by other vegetation, of which there is little to none. Because a very small plant could be blown away by those winds, and because the idea of this particular seeding method is that the pod should provide all the care to the seedling that would normally be provided by manual labour, the shell protects the plant during the early stages of its development.

When that early stage is complete, the shell will degrade, allowing the plant to interact more fully with the terrain, by putting down a larger root pack, anchoring it to the ground. This will have positive effects not just for the plant, but for the entire ecosystem of the area.


I understand your position, however I am not talking about small, volatile trees. Just as in the "spikebouy' project, i mentioned, these artificial trees were about 4 to 5 feet tall. A sapling of this size would have a much better chance of survival and the cost would be way down per tree, since it is a much lower tech approach.

My idea would be to take the root ball of the sapling and encase it in an thin iron ball, rilled with holes, with a big spike on the end. The root ball could be fully filled with water and nutrient and a bio degradable tape put around it so it would dissolve in a few days. Once spiked into the ground, the roots would escape the holes and eventually, rust would dissolve the iron ball as well. Just an idea, but certainly cheaper than designing a space capsule for a very vulnerable small shoot of a tree and expecting that to survive.


reply posted on 24-3-2013 @ 08:54 PM by leolady
reply to post by purplemer



OMG so weird I have come upon this thread this evening. I did a thread this morning regarding growing plants on the moon. & now I see this wonderful information on these tree seed bombs.

So they way I see it... they just need to figure out how to deploy these suckers on the moon... only problem is the containers degrade and well we need the trees to stay in a greenhouse like container for growth on the moon.

Maybe someone can revise this concept and come up with a viable usable option.

This was very Interesting. I think it was a splendid idea even if they never actually utilized it. Thx for sharing !


leolady
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



California going off!
  Posted 16 days ago with 146 member flags
Ice Age Flower Blooms After 32000 Years!
  Posted 15 days ago with 79 member flags
Experts Warn Mount Fuji is Dangerously Close to Erupting
  Posted 5 days ago with 66 member flags
Man building his own island out of plastic bottles
  Posted 12 days ago with 59 member flags
Simple way to discover if your produce is GMO.
  Posted 2 days ago with 46 member flags