It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by saturnsrings
Remember the Bush years? I read the same type of tripe, back then, on these very pages. Bush is going to stop the election and remain President, yea, that kind of thing.
Originally posted by saturnsrings
As I said, they mean it this time, because we have an America hating Mooslim in the WH.
The memo, under the name of one of the Justice Department’s leading crime researchers, critiques the effectiveness of gun control proposals, including some of President Obama’s. A Justice Department official called the memo an unfinished review of gun violence research and said it does not represent administration policy.
Justice Department and White House officials declined to provide much information about the memo or answer questions about it on the record.
The memo has the look of a preliminary document and calls itself “a cursory summary” and assessment of gun curb initiatives. The administration has not released it officially.
Originally posted by Ghost375
Honestly, I wouldn't believe anything that the NRA has to say about Obama, nor any "proof" that they release. It's an extremely biased source.
Best to cross that bridge when Obama takes us to it, blindfolded, single file.
Good luck to the other Americans [you'll need it].
Originally posted by 2ndthought
reply to post by Hecate666
In other words, put a frog in boiling water, and it'll jump right back out. Put a frog in cold water, then slowly bring the water to a boil, and it'll comfortably sit there till death.
Originally posted by saturnsrings
reply to post by macman
Certainly one can own a tank. I specifically said M1A1. As for a war plane. I specifically said F15, or F22. I want mine fully loaded. I want all my weapons/tanks/jets fully loaded. It is my second amendment right. Anything other than fully loaded, is against my second amendment rights, and are being infringed upon. Doesn't matter if I have the money, it is my legal right to own such weapons.
Originally posted by roblot
This seems like a marketing ploy [by the NRA] to increase gun sales.
Originally posted by saturnsrings
I assume I'll be able to amble down to my nearest gun shop and find the grenade launcher I've been longing for then, right? How about an M1A1 tank? If I take flying lessons, can I obtain an F15 Eagle, better yet, an F22 Raptor?
Originally posted by hawkiye
Originally posted by bekod
The first gun grab, that the FED's imposed took place in the 30's, the next one is just around the corner, AR are just the next step in disarming the populace, next it will, be any hand gun or rifle that holds more than 2 shots, all hand guns and most rifles do this what would be left derringers, Dbl shot guns, single shot rifles, this does not infringe on your right to own a firearm, nor does it impede on the second. you just can not own sell buy certain types of firearms , unless you pay a tax and fill out a mountain of forms , just as today with owning a full auto. ie BARS, Tommy 45, Mg42.
The 2nd says "shall not be infringed". That is infringement big time. We have the natural right to bear the arms of our choice!