It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
if anybody cares to know about the skull there is plenty out there for them to educate themselves with. as far as your argument goes you haven't a clue. take for example the brain. do you think it's possible to laser scan the inside of the cranium and model the surface of the brain that sat in there?
One interesting case involving a person with past hydrocephalus was a 44-year-old French man, whose brain had been reduced to little more than a thin sheet of actual brain tissue, due to the buildup of cerebrospinal fluid in his head.
I'm wasting my and any dinosaur's time going round and round with you.
big problem with your idea is that it didn't suffer from hydrocephali. normal sutures+symmetrical thickness = not hydrocephali
you mean the ones from wackipedia?
if you knew this subject you'd know about the skeleton. there's plenty of evidence to go on with just what we have. I mean what the hell, how much do we know about Denisovas by just one finger bone? it's all about the dna and that's coming and once it does you guys will finally go away. I hope not though I love proving you types wrong.
it's all about the dna and that's coming and once it does you guys will finally go away. I hope not though I love proving you types wrong.
Originally posted by tluna1
reply to post by WormwoodSquirm
Not go their and interact due to we may change something, just a window to see what happened. Other then archeology.
I must note here I do not use the word intelligence as I think we have enough examples to show it does not exist in the common usage of the word.
Lets have some hard evidence or something that would demonstrate this idea. Comparisons with different species are irrelevant. My understanding is that when a species dominates its environment, there is no reason for further change. Dinosaurs dominated their environment for 100s of millions of years. There would be minimal reason for them to adapt beyond what they had already achieved and became masters of their world.
This may be the defining difference. Our understanding is that most if not all other species need only be clever enough to survive whereas man HAS to be clever to survive and we are pretty much now at a point where we cannot survive without our tech. We have put all our eggs into one basket which is not very intelligent.
I know we consider skyscrapers, computers and e teas of e trappings of modern society to mean something significant, but it’s all relative, we have not much to compare with so naturally we assume that we live in an advanced age, more advanced than dinosaurs.
I see that differently. Every species will adapt and evolve to be successful within its niche and if it becomes too successful it out strips the resources available. It is limited.
For me however, dinosaurs were more advanced than us simply by being in harmony with their environment something we still struggle to do. Dinosaurs were adapted to their environment to a far greater degree than us. Which is why they were unable to adapt to change when it came.
If you don't have a name, then why are you on here?
William J Mersten is the name of the person that found it near antelope Springs, Utah.
Brad Steiger can support this. /quote]
Wonderful you have the name of the person that found a stain in the rock that looks vaguely like a "shoe print." Whoopee do dah. Oddly enough it was placed in chapter 6 called Paleontological Evidence with the title "William J. Meister Discovery of Human Footprint With Trilobits in a Cambrian Formation of Western Utah"
Interesting isn't it how a stain is a sandal, or footprint, or shoe print. So her I see on page 188 what appears to be nothing more than an oval stain the rock.
The rock formation is famous as a collecting place for trilobites and the rock formation also exhibits many of these mineral stains. This is simply a case of looking long enough and you find a stain with a shape such as viewing clouds. It's called apophenia.
Aliens and intervention have no evidence to show anything just supporters and faith.
Originally posted by TrueMessiah
Intervention from aliens explains why humanity is so much more advanced.
Reptiles such as crocodiles, turtles and snakes existed for 100's of millions of years. Even since the age of the dinosaurs. Far longer than ANY mammal. They haven't progressed one bit. What other conclusion could it be?