It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by colin42
reply to post by FreedomCommander
And that has to do with how the moon was formed how?
Read over it, but there is another contradicting evidence that is swept under the rug.
Moon Compared to Earth It shows
The moon is 98% Earth's size. looked on the internet, 1:4 size.
1. The Moon is approximately 27% the size of the Earth.
2. The volume of the Moon is only 2% compared to the volume of the Earth.
3. The mass of the Moon is only 1.2% of the mass of the Earth
4. 81 Moons = 1 Earth hardly 1:4
Nope. You just need to be careful of the sources just as you have to be careful with books.
Information changes on the internet like nothing. But in books, the older they are, the more reliable they are.
What has the US domestic policies to do with science not adding up? Science
It's just, nothing in science today adds up. I mean, what has the US as a nation done for it's people? Medical? Fail. Automotive? Fail. Education? Fail. Economy? Fail.
So far you have not made any sense what so ever. Really what is the above meant to mean?
So far, I'm stepping on governement's toes for saying these things, and the way I see it, I see three trolls willing to stop at nothing to debunk what I've read, tried and experienced.
Nope. First I am not a scientist and if I have deciphered the above correctly all you need to do is provide an argument backed with evidence for me to consider. You have done neither.
oh, and just to step on your toes, you sound like a scientist of the mainstream, so whatever I say is going out the other ear and the only thing to convince you that what I say is real is if all 5 of your common senses are stimulated.
That didn't answer my question, who said that that man is a fraud? Is it you? If so, then your the fraud.
What about the war waged on every living thing?
and I simply show the door, it's up to people on wether they want to open it or not. Which it seems like you don't want to open it, but, hey, no skin off my nose.
It's kind of like, telling a blind person a color. They never saw it, and they don't know how it feels. Same situation, I tell a bit, and you can look for more or not.
In this situation, you want to know what's pass the door. I can't tell you, it's different for everyone.
No one says you need to change your belief in a fraud like Cater. Cater is very clear that he makes things up. He begs the reader to overlook his need to make things up. You are free to believe in rubbish like Cater's work. All I did was point out Cater's work is based on Cater's imagination and those willing to believe in works based on fantasies.
Dodging, are we? I'm always careful on who I mock, and like I said before, if you haven't read his work, then you have no right to talk anything bad about what he talks about. And you said it, not me.
You don't like him, do you? He hits on everything you know and he even states that anything of the following six are in harmony with his book, the book is nullified.
1. The author fails to define his terms.
2. His presentation involves dimensions beyond the third
3. The article is in harmony with the dogmas of academic physics.
4. His treatise incorporates the Theory of Relativity.
5. He uses a lot of complex mathematics and diagrams.
6. He employs such meaningless terms as hyper-space, hyper-vectors, hyper-scalars, curvature of space-time, space-time, etc. of course this comes under the heading of (1) since such vagaries defy any proper definition.
You deny that there was such a things as the flood, you deny reality, and yet you live. Why is that?
I simply show the door, double-thinker, and it's up to others on whether they want to open it or not.
Two vast empires that were located one off the East and one off the West coast of the USA. Before, ocean level was 500 feet below. After, the empires are gone, and all of it's tech gone as well.
Originally posted by FreedomCommander
reply to post by Barcs
Please explain what orthodox science is and how it differs from conventional science. Science is not orthodox, by nature, it changes when new info becomes available.
aren't you contradicting what you say? Conventional science is orthodox science, I just like hitting the core, that's all.
To add, your not willing to read?
But ok, not my position to force someone else to read it, just something to look over, nothing more.