It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by swan001
reply to post by ImaFungi
reply to post by poet1b
I've checked my model yesterday. I determined that any particles EXACTLY parallel to the time direction would have an infinite mass. And I discovered my model also explains entanglement. It's awesome.
Entanglement signal is EXACTLY parallel to space direction, thus it has no time value. That gives the entanglement signal the possibility to cross all of the Universe's space in, literally, no time. Which means, any particles could communicate with each other, as long as they are on the same state of resonance with the signal.edit on 21-2-2013 by swan001 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by swan001
Originally posted by moebius
The W-boson is an intermediate particle with a very short lifetime in this decay, a virtual particle. It decays pretty much immediately to the electron and antineutrino.
So.. because W- boson only lives a short period of time, its mass can be discarded as unimportant?
Originally posted by ImaFungi
what does exactly parallel to the time direction mean? What is the time direction? What particles have infinite mass?
Originally posted by swan001
Originally posted by ImaFungi
what does exactly parallel to the time direction mean? What is the time direction? What particles have infinite mass?
If someone could answer these two questions, they would be in heavy business.
All I know is my model both predicts the existence of entanglement but also infinite mass. Now entanglement has been observed. But infinite mass? Maybe some of it resides in black holes, but black holes are not particles.edit on 21-2-2013 by swan001 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ErosA433
an infinite mass would produce infinite gravity, no light would escape it and everything would eventually end up in the middle in a great big infinite mess.
Originally posted by swan001
Originally posted by moebius
The W-boson is an intermediate particle with a very short lifetime in this decay, a virtual particle. It decays pretty much immediately to the electron and antineutrino.
So.. because W- boson only lives a short period of time, its mass can be discarded as unimportant?
Originally posted by swan001
Originally posted by ErosA433
an infinite mass would produce infinite gravity, no light would escape it and everything would eventually end up in the middle in a great big infinite mess.
Isn't that the definition of a singularity, inside the black hole's event horizon?
Originally posted by ErosA433
It has enough gravity such that once inside the 'event horizon' the escape velocity is faster than the speed of light. That does not equal having infinite mass or gravity.
Actually at the center of a black hole spacetime has infinite curvature and matter is crushed to infinite density under the pull of infinite gravity. At a singularity, space and time cease to exist as we know them.
Originally posted by ErosA433
the W mass in decay keeps it localized, the mass of the W and Z do figure into these events and is exactly the reason why weak interactions are short range (but longer range than strong ones) if it didnt exist or say happened without this mechanism, ie with no virtual particles, then things like beta decay would occur, and the appearance of the decay product would not be localized. A neutron would decay, and a proton, electron and neutrino would appear randomly somewhere else in the universe completely at random.
As far as we know, particles have not been observed to teleport via the beta decay mechanism.
That is unless I missed this subtlety to what was being explained.
The free neutron decay can also be explained by energetics as has already been explained.
Originally posted by ErosA433
My point is basically that science is a very wide field, and theory is even wider.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
Originally posted by ErosA433
the W mass in decay keeps it localized, the mass of the W and Z do figure into these events and is exactly the reason why weak interactions are short range (but longer range than strong ones) if it didnt exist or say happened without this mechanism, ie with no virtual particles, then things like beta decay would occur, and the appearance of the decay product would not be localized. A neutron would decay, and a proton, electron and neutrino would appear randomly somewhere else in the universe completely at random.
As far as we know, particles have not been observed to teleport via the beta decay mechanism.
That is unless I missed this subtlety to what was being explained.
The free neutron decay can also be explained by energetics as has already been explained.
I dont get why they would be somewhere else in the universe...
Why cant a neutron decay into a proton, and as this is happening and how this is happening is that the extra mass from this conversion turns into an electron and neutrino at the junction of decay?
Is the W boson a way to explain how a neutron "seemingly" contained an electron and neutrino, or how the extra energy of the reaction is "floating" in space and then because of the circumstances it transforms into an electron and neutrino.
Originally posted by ErosA433
Well maybe think of it like this, if there was no system to bind this 'virtual' particle to that point in space, and if the event occurs and is stationary in time, then the range of the virtual particle is infinite or its lifetime would be infinite
Originally posted by ImaFungi
but it seems weird that there are a relatively small amount of stable fundamental particles that make up everything we know and see, and then we smash these together at different speeds in different ways and believe that when we take images of these collisions we are witnessing hundreds of more particles of energy.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Originally posted by ImaFungi
but it seems weird that there are a relatively small amount of stable fundamental particles that make up everything we know and see, and then we smash these together at different speeds in different ways and believe that when we take images of these collisions we are witnessing hundreds of more particles of energy.
They are smashing particles at near speed of light under assumption that the particle is still as original
without any chande whatsoever, at the collision speeds