It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
reply to post by BigBrotherDarkness
Well you mention gravity and space-time curvature... what does gravity have to do with the curvature of space?
Does this imply space-time is something material/physical?
Another mysterious thing is light, and how it travels at all, the description of it being an oscillating E and B field, I dont get how the energy is conserved in a vacuum, how it can travel so far and long, without hitting particles and stuff.. I dont get how if its an oscillating E and B field how that even works or makes sense, being that light contains no charge.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Originally posted by ImaFungi
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Fungi, unless you seperate the 2 entities space and time, you will remain confused.
Time existed b4 space was born.
Did the time of the universe/materials of the universe/space of the universe exist before the universe was born?
Do you believe in the big bang model?
Time and point mass existed but no space.
Big bang = yes
Originally posted by mbkennel
Electric and magnetic fields exist everywhere without requiring a charge in the specific location, but they interact with charges. Light does travel far and long and hit and interact with particles if the particles are charged. If it is a 'vacuum' there are no (real) particles to hit.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Originally posted by ImaFungi
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Fungi, unless you seperate the 2 entities space and time, you will remain confused.
Time existed b4 space was born.
Did the time of the universe/materials of the universe/space of the universe exist before the universe was born?
Do you believe in the big bang model?
Time and point mass existed but no space.
Big bang = yes
How long did this point mass exist before it went bang?
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection
So the finite existence of the point mass was infinitely long? Seriously?
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection
So the finite existence of the point mass was infinitely long? Seriously?
From our perspective yes
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by BigBrotherDarkness
Yes, I guess it is. What does it have to do with my question though. No galaxies before the "bang".
I'm questioning the logic of a infinitely long existent point mass whose existence was finite.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
reply to post by ImaFungi
No our time did not begin at the big bang.
This assumption is the cause of much confusion among physicists.
Again from our perspective / frame of ref. age of universe may well be
close to 28 billion years
edit on 26-2-2013 by Angelic Resurrection because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ImaFungi
OK so age of the universe may be 28 billion years it may be 50 trillion years... but billions and trillions of years are durations of time... a finite duration of time implies the beginning of the measuring of that duration. If I count to ten seconds with 1 second in between each second, this duration of 10 seconds had a beginning of time, and spanned a span of time. If we count to 28 billion years, this implies that the counting (the time/duration) began at a ...time.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by BigBrotherDarkness
Yes, I guess it is. What does it have to do with my question though. No galaxies before the "bang".
I'm questioning the logic of a infinitely long existent point mass whose existence was finite.
Time ticked away then ( b4 the big bang ) at infinite rate so form our perspective, finite existance is kind of moot.