It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FyreByrd
Originally posted by 11235813213455
Originally posted by FyreByrd
Originally posted by 11235813213455
So blue brains have a tendency to group think and have a lack of inidividuality.... Makes sense
Group think is another phenomenon entirely. Blue brains, as you put it, think in terms of their place in a greater whole rather then their place alone without regard to the world around them.edit on 14-2-2013 by FyreByrd because: spelling
Exactly...they "know their place" No individualisim.
You can be an individual and still part of a group. All of us perform this trick everyday, in many different ways.
The idea that you will lose yourself if you are connected with others and the world is silly and is one of the ways that one's self-ish ego purpetuates it'self.
I think you are afraid of becoming a drone, as in a hive, and are afriad of losing yourself. My limited group/psychic type experiences (we don't really have terms for this) show how false and misleading that limited idea of connection is.
Have you ever experienced FLOW or a PEAK EXPERIENCE? Most likely playing sports with others, or music or another group indeavor. An experience that was easy wherein you were at your best, clear minded but plugged into something greater and you received from this 'greater' and it cycled into your performance? Maybe it was a time that you did something - a presentation or speech or a simple walk, where you stepped out of time and became more? There is no loss of self involved, in fact I would argue that you true self was exposed and made more by it. That's the type of group conscienceness that we are evolving towards. It's not a loss of self but an enhanced self - enhanced by all we open ourselves to. And it is fear that keeps this truth from our awareness.
But all that is off the core topic. Which is simply that blue brains and red brains function and perceive the world differently.
Originally posted by spqrenki
It's a simple question of do you support the constitution and the ideas that this nation was founded on or do you not. There is no red and blue, left or right, liberal or conservative. The fact is, democrats in large care absolutely nothing for this country or what she was founded on - most would be happy to see the President crowned as King. Issues like race, abortion, gay rights, etc. are more important to Liberals than things like personal liberty and justice.
Does that mean Republicans are perfect? Absolutely not. But given the choice between your average Conservative and your average Liberal? Again, do you support the constitution or are you voting simply on race and/or party?
Originally posted by antonia
reply to post by tovenar
Those behaviors have more to do with impulse control. These are uncalculated risks you are discussing and it's not what the study is referencing. We are not talking about the impulse to take risk rather how one approaches it.
Ex: The conservative would think "Will this hurt me"?
The liberal "Will this hurt us"?
See the difference there? Has nothing to do with impulsive behavior.
And in my case it is generally "Need more data" lol
Originally posted by FriedBabelBroccoli
Originally posted by antonia
reply to post by tovenar
Those behaviors have more to do with impulse control. These are uncalculated risks you are discussing and it's not what the study is referencing. We are not talking about the impulse to take risk rather how one approaches it.
Ex: The conservative would think "Will this hurt me"?
The liberal "Will this hurt us"?
See the difference there? Has nothing to do with impulsive behavior.
And in my case it is generally "Need more data" lol
Haha I read the article and went through the data and the first thing I thought of was how well do these individuals know what is and/or isn't a risk to them/ the group they associate with?
I also got a good laugh how the researcher goes on trying to say that humans are evolving towards political and socialization . . .
Every philosopher worth the 'left overs' knows politicians are at the core of all societies problems. Them and lawyers.
His inclusion of politics makes me seriously doubt his mental integrity!
Honestly every intelligent person I have met thinks politicians are idiots, so what does that say about our future?
Originally posted by Xaphan
Sorry, but I don't buy it. If liberals and conservatives have differently structured brains, then why is it possible for some people to do a complete 180° on their views & opinions within their lifetime? Some conservatives have changed their ideals and become liberals, and vice versa. It's not uncommon for people to denounce their political opinions; just like some people denounce their own religion.
Also, what about the people who aren't really right or left? Some people (like me) share opinions with both sides. For example, I'm primarily a leftist, but I also agree with gun ownership.
Sorry science, but it isn't this easy to categorize people into neat & tidy little piles, as much as you'd love it to be.edit on 14-2-2013 by Xaphan because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by abeverage
They are both messed up! Using one side or the other of their brains instead of both!
This is exactly why I am an Independent with some libertarian leanings
Originally posted by BobbyTarass
82 people, Seriously ? When even under 1000 it'd be considered as a non-representative sample
Originally posted by Xaphan
Sorry, but I don't buy it. If liberals and conservatives have differently structured brains, then why is it possible for some people to do a complete 180° on their views & opinions within their lifetime? Some conservatives have changed their ideals and become liberals, and vice versa. It's not uncommon for people to denounce their political opinions; just like some people denounce their own religion.
Also, what about the people who aren't really right or left? Some people (like me) share opinions with both sides. For example, I'm primarily a leftist, but I also agree with gun ownership.
Sorry science, but it isn't this easy to categorize people into neat & tidy little piles, as much as you'd love it to be.edit on 14-2-2013 by Xaphan because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 11235813213455
Originally posted by FyreByrd
Originally posted by 11235813213455
So blue brains have a tendency to group think and have a lack of inidividuality.... Makes sense
Group think is another phenomenon entirely. Blue brains, as you put it, think in terms of their place in a greater whole rather then their place alone without regard to the world around them.edit on 14-2-2013 by FyreByrd because: spelling
Exactly...they "know their place" No individualisim.
Originally posted by FyreByrd
Again the fact of seeking why something is wrong/bad/irrelevant is a trait of the conservative mind. The liberal mind would tend towards considering the possiblities while acknowledging the limitations of the study.
Originally posted by spqrenki
reply to post by mahatche
They are minor issues compared to the corruption within the out of control government, endless spending, double-digit unemployment, a failing education system, the world's largest prison population (mostly caused by the failed war on drugs), the patriot act, the NDAA, endless wars and conflict, poverty, foreign aid, etc. etc. etc.
The point is, there are more important issues that people need to be concerned about. And see, everything I've listed above are things that Liberals think are fine. But you take intelligent people that could be making a difference out of the conversation when they're more concerned about race, gay rights or abortion.
Originally posted by xedocodex
reply to post by FyreByrd
You could infer from this that the cognitive styles of conversatives diifer from liberals in that self-centered fear motivates the conservative (red) folk
Which would explain why they love guns so much...they live life in a state of fear.
Originally posted by spqrenki
reply to post by mahatche
They are minor issues compared to the corruption within the out of control government, endless spending, double-digit unemployment, a failing education system, the world's largest prison population (mostly caused by the failed war on drugs), the patriot act, the NDAA, endless wars and conflict, poverty, foreign aid, etc. etc. etc.
The point is, there are more important issues that people need to be concerned about. And see, everything I've listed above are things that Liberals think are fine. But you take intelligent people that could be making a difference out of the conversation when they're more concerned about race, gay rights or abortion.
Originally posted by votan
Originally posted by xedocodex
reply to post by FyreByrd
You could infer from this that the cognitive styles of conversatives diifer from liberals in that self-centered fear motivates the conservative (red) folk
Which would explain why they love guns so much...they live life in a state of fear.
actually liberals live in fear of everything which is why they want to ban everything. Conservatives want to let scary guns be legal. who is really living in fear here??
wawa waaa scary guns ban them !! wasn't there some fraidy cat city board person who ran out because someone had a gun what a wussy
Originally posted by votan
Originally posted by xedocodex
reply to post by FyreByrd
You could infer from this that the cognitive styles of conversatives diifer from liberals in that self-centered fear motivates the conservative (red) folk
Which would explain why they love guns so much...they live life in a state of fear.
actually liberals live in fear of everything which is why they want to ban everything. Conservatives want to let scary guns be legal. who is really living in fear here??
wawa waaa scary guns ban them !! wasn't there some fraidy cat city board person who ran out because someone had a gun what a wussy