It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Market distortions due to political preferences are "a bad thing."
The same as hiring Alan Dershowitz doesn't minimize the legitimacy of my legal defernse.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by jdub297
Faulty logic.
Why?
You cite scientists being supported by AGW "supporters".
But the fact that there are scientists supported by AGW "deniers" is irrelevant?
The source of funding, without more, is meaningless.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by jdub297
Market distortions due to political preferences are "a bad thing."
Political preferences are reducing the cost of photovoltaic systems?
How does that work? I know there are tax credits involved. Is that a bad thing?
Good question. You think it's odd that incorrect information is not distributed? Of course, it would have been more fun for you if the goof had been broadcast.
Whatever happened to the topic of the BBC editing out the unfounded proclamations of a biased AGW advocate?
That is true. But actual costs for PV systems have declined. And, as occured in the 70's, increasing oil prices have made alternative energy sources more practical from a relative standpoint.
Rebates, subsidies and tax credits do not change the underlying costs of production.
You aren't, I don't, and I don't think you live in my state. But why should I, who ride a bike (hypothetically speaking) pay for you to drive on a road I don't ever use?
Why should I and my family pay for you to light your home with wind or solar or hydrogen power?
Ummm....."Hole Global Warming"...as in carbon credit money pit...? As in AGW believers digging themselves deeper?............Wow, that's another fine case of ........"your Freudian slip"...is showing.
Originally posted by starfoxxx
This hole global warming thing seems like a scam.. Pay some people some money and it all goes away..
Originally posted by jdub297
Originally posted by ~widowmaker~
reply to post by bigyin
these "people" have been trying to sway public opinion and thus taxes into programs that will ulimately F the planet up worse trying to fix something that wasnt broken, or at the very minimum do absolutely nothing.
Precisely!
There is no man-made "cure" for a warming climate. We should be focused on adaptation. Plants and wildlife adapt. Man adapted before, during and after the ice ages of the past 100,000 years.
As time goes by, more "scientists" see that a different strategy than throwing money at the problem is the wisest response to a changing climate.
jw
Originally posted by starfoxxx
This hole global warming thing seems like a scam.. Pay some people some money and it all goes away..
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
which is the more believable conspiracy.....
all the climatologists are in on it for.....well, can't think of a reason, or the big oil companies are smearing the climatologists so they can keep selling oil ?
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by jdub297
Good question. You think it's odd that incorrect information is not distributed? Of course, it would have been more fun for you if the goof had been broadcast.
Whatever happened to the topic of the BBC editing out the unfounded proclamations of a biased AGW advocate?
So how do you fix global warming without taxing people and making oil cost go up, while China will balance out any good America or other developed nations make on reducing emissions...
Originally posted by YouSir
Ummm....."Hole Global Warming"...as in carbon credit money pit...? As in AGW believers digging themselves deeper?............Wow, that's another fine case of ........"your Freudian slip"...is showing.
Originally posted by starfoxxx
This hole global warming thing seems like a scam.. Pay some people some money and it all goes away..
YouSir
Ummm....I really don't have any faith that there "is anything to fix". It all just sounds like weather to me...which frankly has never been static during my lifetime. If the IPCC had been truthful from the getgo and included things such as historic cycles and solar output and not played hide the monkey with data not supportive of their assertions then perhaps they would have a tad more credibility..."Carbon credits", what a perfectly laughable solution to a non-existant problem........If it makes you feel better you can call me a denier as I call you a sycophant.
Originally posted by starfoxxx
So how do you fix global warming without taxing people and making oil cost go up, while China will balance out any good America or other developed nations make on reducing emissions...
Originally posted by YouSir
Ummm....."Hole Global Warming"...as in carbon credit money pit...? As in AGW believers digging themselves deeper?............Wow, that's another fine case of ........"your Freudian slip"...is showing.
Originally posted by starfoxxx
This hole global warming thing seems like a scam.. Pay some people some money and it all goes away..
YouSir
Originally posted by YouSir
Ummm....I really don't have any faith that there "is anything to fix". It all just sounds like weather to me...which frankly has never been static during my lifetime. If the IPCC had been truthful from the getgo and included things such as historic cycles and solar output and not played hide the monkey with data not supportive of their assertions then perhaps they would have a tad more credibility..."Carbon credits", what a perfectly laughable solution to a non-existant problem........If it makes you feel better you can call me a denier as I call you a sycophant.
Originally posted by starfoxxx
So how do you fix global warming without taxing people and making oil cost go up, while China will balance out any good America or other developed nations make on reducing emissions...
Originally posted by YouSir
Ummm....."Hole Global Warming"...as in carbon credit money pit...? As in AGW believers digging themselves deeper?............Wow, that's another fine case of ........"your Freudian slip"...is showing.
Originally posted by starfoxxx
This hole global warming thing seems like a scam.. Pay some people some money and it all goes away..
YouSir
YouSir
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by jdub297
Good question. You think it's odd that incorrect information is not distributed? Of course, it would have been more fun for you if the goof had been broadcast.
Whatever happened to the topic of the BBC editing out the unfounded proclamations of a biased AGW advocate?
You aren't, I don't, and I don't think you live in my state. But why should I, who ride a bike (hypothetically speaking) pay for you to drive on a road I don't ever use?
Why should I and my family pay for you to light your home with wind or solar or hydrogen power?
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by jdub297
That is true. But actual costs for PV systems have declined. And, as occured in the 70's, increasing oil prices have made alternative energy sources more practical from a relative standpoint.
Rebates, subsidies and tax credits do not change the underlying costs of production.