It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
I just sent off an e-mail to Art Lerner-Lam asking him to comment on your version of his statements It will be quite interesting to find out what he has to say about the situation directly from him.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Ah, the stock conspiracy theorists answer that gets pulled out whenever they are refuted by a legitimate expert: �the scientists are afraid.� Or �the firefighters are afraid to tell you about 9/11,� or �the pilots are afraid to tell us about chemtrails� and so it goes.
No, the truth is never afraid. It is you, sitting in your house of cards that you have built out of your erroneous assumptions and your misunderstanding of the basic principles of chemistry, physics and engineering that is afraid.
Originally posted by godservant
I am a volunteer firefighter 45 minutes away from NY. I recently met several from the city and the talk of 911 is forbidden. I asked a couple about and they told me that they could not discuss it, but not to believe the official version. Thats all I could get.
With 7WTC being demolished, so soon after the towers fell, that means the building was already wired to go. Ask yourself one question - 'Hows that?'.
Originally posted by billybob
you were the one refuted by an expert, ....two actually.
it may be a stock answer, because it is a stock pattern.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Originally posted by billybob
you were the one refuted by an expert, ....two actually.
it may be a stock answer, because it is a stock pattern.
Not hardly. Your comments by the expert are so taken out of context that they are worthless. That I intend to prove.
I challenge you to find a seismologist somewhere, anywhere that will support your contentions. You will not.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
By the fact that you are trying to change the subject, am I to infer that you unable to refute the fact that there is no evidence of �underground explosions� in the seismic data?
If you are conceding this, then I will move on to your next point, otherwise, please review this post and respond to the very simple question that I have pose there.
Thanks.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
There is a separate thread on this already.
And besides the situations are not comparable.
[edit on 27-10-2004 by HowardRoark]
Originally posted by taibunsuu
Originally posted by HowardRoark
There is a separate thread on this already.
And besides the situations are not comparable.
[edit on 27-10-2004 by HowardRoark]
Why are they not comparable?
Also, any idea at all why 7 WTC collapsed?
Originally posted by twitchy
The average passenger on board isn't likely to know if a pilot or a fly by wire system is operating the aircraft. In the 1980's, in the wake of several hijackings, they instituted a system in commercial airliners that would would allow control of these aircraft from an external source. The system is pretty much impossible to override once it has been initiated.
Originally posted by twitchy
There is alot of speculation about the terrorists actually being on the planes, this comes from the lack of their names on the seat lists, the lack of footage showing them at the airports, the fact that several of the named terrorists showed up alive and well in other parts of the world after 9-11 and others. As to my beliefs, it may better to state simply that I don't believe the offical story and my posts on this thread are an active exploration of alternatives. As to the passengers of those aircraft, we will never know, they tragically, probably got hauled off with the rest of the evidence.