Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by DaTroof
That's great if Rahm can get more cops. Now you just have to get the Aldermen and the ward bosses to let the cops in to the districts that need a thorough cleaning...
Who has suggested an amendment to the constitution specifically the 2nd? Please link me to this information.
"It's time that we as a city have an assault weapons ban. It's time that we as a state have an assault weapons ban. It's time that we as a country have an assault weapons ban," Emanuel said.
The problem is that Emanuel's ban, in place from 1994 to 2004, had no measurable effect on crime.
Obama has no power to take away guns anyone with an 8th grade education in U.S. government knows that. Hate to point out the obvious but the president cannot write or pass laws nor can he amend or change the constitution. And isn't the point of your topic about shooters getting out of being charged?
Blame on a President is a distraction anyone who does has a narrow focused agenda. And as far as charges he has not been a rep of that state in more than 4 years surely it is because he is president...It would be the Judges not a representative that decides who is charged and who is not. So unless you are blaming him for a pardon I don't see your point!
This is an anti-Obama thread yet again which is a pointless distraction, as always people need a scapegoat instead of finding the real threats.
Oh cool, I might know some of your family!
The thing is, Rahm is working to get more police on the streets. Source
I agree that Chicago is crooked, hell it's always been. That's why it's not a good example when it comes to proving whether or not certain anti-crime tactics are efficient. For myself and your family and all the other residents of Chicagoland, I hope that eventually these crime rates will drop.
Umm I dunno maybe because it's CHICAGO a notoriously bad crime city, duh. And that is a percentage difference of 2.5% It's not even worth reporting thats more than likely in their +/- range from the skewing of study results. and maybe there was more shootings and the same number of cops, could be any number of things.
Quit wasting people's time (including my own) with nothing.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Most Shooters in Obama’s Home Town of Chicago Don’t Face Charges. Why is that?,
Because OBAMA HIMSELF didn't want them to. He said it was RAAAAAAAAAAACIST.
ATS Thread - 1999 Sen. Obama Wouldn't Support Tougher Prosecution for School Shooters
Tied to this - Sen. Obama Backs Race Based School Discipline Policies
- Race Based ... as in, let the 'minorities' off but nail the white kids for the same crime.
and check this out ...
He (obama) also voted against allowing persons who had obtained domestic violence protective orders to carry handguns for their protection.
That was great!!!!! I've never read about those. Let's see how he plays the "do as I say not as I...." wait, uuuhhhhh, "do as I do and not as I..." no, no it's "don't do as I say or do.... oh hell, Joe, hey Joe, you wanna take this one, I gotta golf ball with my name on it"
Originally posted by Wildbob77
Nobody sees anything
Nobody knows anything
Snitching is far worse then having the cops arrest the gunman.
Take Chicago for example...are gun laws and gun bans going to matter to criminals?
They break the law already, they don't care about the law.
so violent crime has increased due to taking away the peoples right to own guns for self defense, they live in fear.
Originally posted by seabag
Why would a state with some of the strictest gun laws in the country have one of the absolute highest violent crime rates and one of the most abysmal gun crime prosecution rates?