What happened to Lanza's Computer?

page: 1
2
<<   2 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 10:11 AM
link   
We were informed many times my the MSM that Adam Lanza's computer had been destroyed but still recoverable. We were told personal was extracting information. Where is that information? It has not been mentioned in the news since December 21st. Same with the reason why he did it. They released a story about why Lanza shot up the school but quickly redacted that story saying it was wrong. There is alot wrong with this event and many unanswered questions




posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 10:29 AM
link   
reply to post by ethang10
 


Too many



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 10:32 AM
link   
To be fair, a destroyed computer doesn't necessarily mean that paper copies of stuff don't exist. Memory sticks?!



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 10:37 AM
link   
reply to post by ethang10
 

I'm guessing it's with the rest of the 'case file' under seal by order of the Court for the time being. Unless something major has changed, they put a date on when that will change for those documents and records proper to release on an event like this. Patience is all there is for it ...and speculation is what caused the lock down in the first place. It won't speed things up or help any of this become public any sooner, IMO.

Of course, that doesn't stop the apparent thought that somehow it will. Yikes... Now forensic data recovery is at issue?

edit on 31-1-2013 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 11:51 AM
link   
This shooting is very fishy. No videos even though there are cameras in the school and no photos. I'm not saying we should see dead children but didn't we get to see the columbine shooters bodies? What about the rifle found in Lanza's trunk, and no it was not a shotgun. You can easily see the officer slide back the bolt exactly like a rifle. Also what ever happened to the Christopher Rodia thing with the lincese plate? The real story of Sandy Hook will never come out and when people demand video evidence or other evidence, they will be labeled as crazy conspiracy theorists with no heart.



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 12:01 PM
link   
If the official story every comes out, it had better have video - same goes for the Aurora CO shootings.
My money is on Lanza's computer not having anything remotely incriminating on it... at least before the PTB got hold of it.

ganjoa



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 12:12 PM
link   
reply to post by ganjoa
 

We agree on a great deal but I have to ask you on this one..... Just what video would you want to see? If you mean hallway and outside footage (I hadn't seen cameras mounted on the exterior of the buildings there?) then I can see your point and wouldn't mind seeing myself that this guy got out, walked in and didn't come back out.

Anything more....detailed...I'd hope they lock down forever and VERY tightly at that ...if such a thing exists at all. I could see video of the crime scenes themselves becoming black market "hits" to the very sick puppies that run around some of the darker corners of the net.

* something occurred to me. The school didn't appear to have outside mounted cameras but he passed a Fire Station and who knows what else on his way there. His vehicle, the # of occupants if more than just him and perhaps a clear look at him may be possible from those?

Personally, I'll be very anxious to see inventory sheets. when released, of what was collected by warrants as part of the investigation. Recordings like that should at least be mentioned if not part of the record. Hmmm... Interesting take on some of this.

edit on 31-1-2013 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 02:24 PM
link   
As we speak they are probably dumping a whole pile of bookmarks into his browser that link to gore sites, and anything else that could be considered sociopathic. Probably at least 20 gigs of child porn too for good measure. You know, just to really vilify him and smear his name in s**t.



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 02:31 PM
link   
reply to post by ethang10
 


It's evidence. It'll be released with the official report. I read at one point that we should expect it sometime in march, but I cant find that source now.



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 02:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by ganjoa
If the official story every comes out, it had better have video - same goes for the Aurora CO shootings.
My money is on Lanza's computer not having anything remotely incriminating on it... at least before the PTB got hold of it.

ganjoa


No, it really should not include any video, if any exists. A description, maybe.

Why anyone would want to see a video of babies being murdered is beyond me, but I can tell you one thing: if I were a parent of any of the killed children, I would absolutely take whatever legal action I possibly could to keep the video of my child being splattered on the floor from being released for public consumption.



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 03:01 PM
link   
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 





It's evidence. It'll be released with the official report. I read at one point that we should expect it sometime in march, but I cant find that source now.


Just like they released the 9/11 pentagon footage with the official report right?


Oh wait, they never did release it. Never mind.



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 03:04 PM
link   
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 

Official Report?
You mean like JFK?
You mean like Oklahoma City?
You mean like 9/11?
You mean like 7/7?
You mean Diana?
etc etc????

Any official report will be meaningless - a fabrication.

Video cameras???
Just like 9/11, 7/7 and Diana - they will come up with the same excuse and claim that the video cameras were switched OFF.



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 03:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by MagicWand67
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 





It's evidence. It'll be released with the official report. I read at one point that we should expect it sometime in march, but I cant find that source now.


Just like they released the 9/11 pentagon footage with the official report right?


Oh wait, they never did release it. Never mind.


So you're saying you cant even wait to see what is or isnt in the report before calling foul. Well played


If things are left out, ask the questions. But how can you question what you havent read? All I was saying was that they cpu is evidence, and therefore wont be made public until AFTER the investigation. Which is a fact.



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 03:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Alpha20mega
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 

Official Report?
You mean like JFK?
You mean like Oklahoma City?
You mean like 9/11?
You mean like 7/7?
You mean Diana?
etc etc????

Any official report will be meaningless - a fabrication.

Video cameras???
Just like 9/11, 7/7 and Diana - they will come up with the same excuse and claim that the video cameras were switched OFF.


Doesnt matter. Even IF (big if) there is video, it should not be publicly released.

My point on the official report, again, is that it isnt even out yet. Are you so deadset on finding a conspiracy that you cant even wait to read it before disregarding it?



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 03:35 PM
link   
official report? who's gonna write that? Spielberg? Disney? Roald Dahl? What a work of fiction that will be...

I notice someone not wanting to see babies being shot - where any babies shot? and children? Funny how one of the kids sat on abama's knee a couple of days after the so called "shooting" another picture of a "victim" was stolen from a mother's facebook page and used, My Parker's hysterical laughter couldn't mask his broken heart - did this really happen at all?

600 kids went to that school - where were they? Why wasn't there a single ambulance anywhere near the school?

Where were the parents and extended families of all 600 kids?

If you're child was killed there, would you just bury the child and not be heard of again?

This stinks!



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 03:53 PM
link   
reply to post by erebh


official report? who's gonna write that? Spielberg? Disney? Roald Dahl? What a work of fiction that will be...

 


So we have another person who rejects the report before its even out.





I notice someone not wanting to see babies being shot - where any babies shot? and children?


Ummm yeah, there were.




Funny how one of the kids sat on abama's knee a couple of days after the so called "shooting"


You mean Emilie Parker's SISTER sat on Obama's knee. I cant believe people are still trying to push this garbage.




Parker's hysterical laughter couldn't mask his broken heart


That he didnt react the way that you think he should have reacted is proof of nothing. Again, I cant believe people are still pushing this garbage.




did this really happen at all?


yes, yes it did, as sad as that is.




If you're child was killed there, would you just bury the child and not be heard of again?


That they are not parading themselves out to the media does not mean that their child is not heard of again. That notion is asinine. After the way that sections of the public have acted-accusing them of being fake, harassing them, disrespecting their dead kids-why on earth would they go public at this point?
edit on 31-1-2013 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 04:02 PM
link   
no one said anyone had to go public but a few of them did.

why choose the points you want to debunk? I made 10 points and you could only argue with half - doesnt that tell you something?

So Parker's hysterical laughing, joking with the cameraman then getting into character is normal behaviour for a bereaved parent?

And even if it was Parker's sister sitting on Obama's lap - isnt that a bit of a coincidence?

Way too many coincidences if you ask me...



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 04:13 PM
link   
reply to post by erebh
 


I'm not sure what you think I left out, I certainly didnt leave out half. Go ahead and restate what you think I left out.

The Parker argument is weak and moot. You have NO idea what was said to him at that moment. That he didnt react exactly the way you think he should is not evidence of anything, other than the fact that all humans are different. And the 'getting into character' claim is silly, at best. Nothing he does in that video shows that he was getting into character. He took a moment to gather himself before he spoke to millions of people on t.v. for what was likely the first time in his life, and right in the midst of the most horrible situation imaginable.

Why is it a coincidence that Emilie Parkers sisters (both of them) were there at the event? All of the kids in that photo were siblings of victims. THAT WAS THE POINT.

As Ive said all along, there are questions to be answered. But people like you are the biggest problem with this story. passing off false info and theories as plausible, when, in fact, the slightest bit of research proves them total fabrications.



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 05:45 PM
link   
reply to post by ethang10
 


The black operations agents destroyed the incriminating evidence.

Lanza (a patsy) would have been exposed if they didn't destroy the evidence.



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 06:03 PM
link   
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 


Just what to make it clear that one security camera is placed at the door. They use this to buzz in others. This camera should have footage of Lanza forcing himself in. It does not involve any shooting or deaths. It really does show you how messy this story is. Back in columbine we got video evidence from multiple angles and we got to see the bodies. How come we cant see the same for Sandy Hook





new topics
top topics
 
2
<<   2 >>

log in

join