What happened to Lanza's Computer?

page: 2
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 06:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by ethang10
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 


Just what to make it clear that one security camera is placed at the door. They use this to buzz in others. This camera should have footage of Lanza forcing himself in. It does not involve any shooting or deaths. It really does show you how messy this story is. Back in columbine we got video evidence from multiple angles and we got to see the bodies. How come we cant see the same for Sandy Hook


You may well get the video evidence from the front door ONCE THE INVESTIGATION IS FINISHED. It is standard, proper procedure not to publicly release these things until the investigation is done.

As far as columbine, two points 1)They SHOULD NOT have released footage of bodies; and 2)That was not the same level of bloodbath as Sandy Hook.




posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 06:07 PM
link   
They said early on in the news that Adam Lanza smashed his computer.www.nypost.com...

BUT,

nothing else mentioned since this:
Adam Lanza's Smashed Hard Drive Doesn't Erase His Digital Footprint, Experts Say
www.huffingtonpost.com...



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 06:57 PM
link   
reply to post by dianashay
 


Many MSM networks stated that the hard drive was being recovered. Nothing has come of that for months. Cannot wait till the "offical" report in march or whatever. Gives them sufficient time to make their edits



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 07:21 PM
link   
because this looks like a father who just had his daughter massacred... www.youtube.com...



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 07:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by erebh
because this looks like a father who just had his daughter massacred... www.youtube.com...


So there's a 'normal' way to act in a situation such as this? Please, fill us in, show us some text.

Again, I cannot believe these stupid theories are still being pushed.

Embarrassing.
edit on 31-1-2013 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 08:03 PM
link   
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 


I agree with you somewhat. I don't believe in the bull# about Emilie and the fathers behavior. I do think that children were killed and people's lives were ruined. What I don't believe is that Lanza was the only shooter and the only one involved. A skinny 24 year old gunning down running children with exact precision just doesn't sit right with me. Look back at all other shootings, many were hurt. But in Sandy Hook 1 person was injured. I do not think Lanza could have fired that accurate into a bunch of running kids. Even if he had training at shooting ranges, there not moving fast targets. Also, I didn't seem to hear any exact confirmation or witness seeing Lanza shoot alone. If I am wrong please link me to a story that has a witness.



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 08:31 PM
link   
reply to post by ethang10
 


As I have said many times, there are a whole lot of questions to be answered, but the majority of the 'theories' are there are utter B.S.

As far as the fatality rate in this instance, you have to keep somethings in mind:
1)They werent running children. By pretty much all accounts, the slain were huddled together, as you would expect a bunch of 6 year olds to do in a moment of unbelievable fear and chaos
2)One would not have to be a great marksman to be extremely accurate with an ar-15 at close range, with no moving targets
3)Its is highly unlikely that a 6 year old would survive one wound from a .223. Considering that reports are that all the kids had no less than 3, and up to 12 wounds, it isnt really a surprise that there werent survivors.

As for the 'second shooter', I would not be surprised if it were true. But just as we dont have much for accounts of there being only one shooter, we dont have any accounts of there being more than one.



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 08:39 PM
link   
Oh, nothing much. He decided after much thought and presence of mind to destroy any evidence of himself on his hard drive after strapping on a bullet proof vest with hundreds of rounds to march into an elementary school he had no connection with to shoot a bunch of kids he didn't know only to shoot himself when he heard sirens.

Destroying the hard drive makes perfect sense, doesn't it? Good thing he had that bullet proof vest on too, the bullet he shot himself with could have been a very serious injury otherwise.....Oh wait.........



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 06:26 AM
link   
reply to post by Helious
 


I'm not questioning the smashing of the hard drive. I'm questioning what the officials did with it. They said they found a way to access it but a month later nothing has come of it.



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 06:59 AM
link   
there were 600 kids at that school yet we saw only a handful in a line in the yard - we are told 22 were killed - where are the other 550? And where are the parents and extended families of those 600 kids? I know if my child was at that school and I got a call at work to say there was a shooter, the whole US army couldn't keep me away and I'd imagine that goes for everyone - so where are the families of 600 kids? standing peacefully behind police tape between two trees? Where are the ambulances? We are told there where 28 bodies yet not one ambulance?

Obviously not everybody in the world would act the same in this scenario (Rob Parker) but laughing with cameramen and interviewers? c'mon - God forbid if you're child was killed - in any fashion - not even being told you won the lottery would make you even crack a smile

It all stinks



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 07:07 AM
link   
reply to post by erebh
 


Have you made any effort to determine who took the picture of them in a line and why they didn't take any more pics, or if they did, why those pics hadn't also been released to the media?



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 09:41 AM
link   
reply to post by IvanAstikov
 


I'm not talking about still pictures, i'm talking about video footage of the whole day from every single angle including helicopters - where are the other 550 kids and 600 extended families? and ambulances? and you'd expect hundreds of cops if not the army or reservists? where are they all?



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 12:22 PM
link   
reply to post by erebh
 


The point was, if you could discover who took the pic the media released, you could ask them if there had been any kind of restrictions imposed on those attempting to document the scene. The MSM had obviously been advised not to try and get any footage of the children's bodies being removed from the school, and it was done at night, to make it even more difficult for ghouls, professional, or otherwise.



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 12:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
 


Wrabbit, I'm not interested in seeing the killing or the bloodshed, as I've seen more than one lifetime's worth.
What you suggest about the entry video or video from the fire station is a good start for the Sandy Hook incident. I'd like to see the mall "pursuit" video and entry and exit video from the Aurora shootings. IMO if the "official story" is to have any credibility at this point, there needs to be some hard evidence, like the inventory sheets, the CSI photos of shell casings and holes in the walls, and the entry team sweeping the building (don't the SWAT guys have helmet cams these days?). Since we have learned that some of the media footage came from other locales than Sandy Hook, there isn't much credibility on what is currently in the public domain. I do not believe any of this will be made public and therefore conclude that like the JFK assassination, there will never be any closure on what really happened that day.

All in the plan my man, all in the plan to keep "us" divided, marginalized and manipulated.

With respect,
ganjoa



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 03:50 PM
link   
reply to post by ganjoa
 

Indeed and I didn't honestly think you were looking for the ghoulish stuff. Some on here are though and have outright said as much for both Aurora and CT. That mindset leaves me both horrified and disgusted.

Not so for an honest desire to understand what did and did not happen in such a tragedy taken to national levels of awareness and sympathy. We all need to know at some point to put it behind us, as a nation. It's small to some people...but I think that was one of the most horrible spree killings we've ever had. I hope it's not surpassed in my lifetime for circumstance.

Now on release, as I understood it, the court did set a specific date for lifting the seal on what is legally public record, didn't they? If not and after speaking to a retired cop in that area of the nation (not directly connected to this) to get an idea of how/what could be happening behind the scenes for why cops are putting up with it.....I came away with one solid feeling.

The Cops can be shut up by order ......for awhile. They can have political reality trump everything else for a period of time because it's their pension and their OWN families future if they do not follow along to get along. Having said that? I have zero question in my mind that if this were to start falling away with major facts hidden like lesser incidents have in the past? An actual percentage of first responders and those involved in the investigation would burn their pensions and call it a fair deal to insure no guilty party walked away from this bloodbath. Especially for political reasons which I've NEVER known cops to have much tolerance for in the first place.

We'll know the details eventually. It'll just take some time for things to work through and the politicians to play the time they CAN get from this to say this happened how it best supports their legislative agendas. It won't hold forever, or even very long, IMO. Hence the RUSH RUSH RUSH on gun regulation, to my thinking.



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 07:10 PM
link   
reply to post by IvanAstikov
 


Actually there is one...........





posted on Feb, 3 2013 @ 07:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by SMOKINGGUN2012
reply to post by IvanAstikov
 


Actually there is one...........





You're right... seemingly taken by somebody up in a tree. Was that an officially authorised photographer taking the pic?





 
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join