Originally posted by Thought Provoker
Originally posted by golemina
The short version is simply that 'Gravity' per se... Simply does NOT exist. It is an EFFECT, not a cause.
Isn't that precisely what my theory says? The "gravity wind" is the cause, the vacuum energy, ZPE, is the cause. Gravity, electromagnetism, the strong
and weak nuclear forces; they're all effects.
'They're all effects.'
Negatory good buddy.
You seem to suddenly being throwing 'everything' into some kind of grab bag without any kind of differentiation or quantification.
And then somehow automagically stating something to the effect of 'that's what I meant ALL ALONG!'
One could also make the case that you seem to also be essentially attributing this cause celebre to everything but what some of us heretics have
always referred to in some form for the last couple of hundred years... as the Ether.
So essentially, you're adding yet another name for an erroneously discarded BASIS... What is that now... like the 6000th name, for essentially a
Claiming 'it' as your own (original thought)?
To attempt to go on this ride, though politically suicidal, you show be tall enough to step up AND ACTUALLY DECLARE YOURSELF...
Say something to the effect that 'GRAVITY' is dead! (And so is almost EVERY currently accepted theory bordering this area of 'expertise'== that would
be a whole LOT of territory!
) and lay out something along the lines of... You know!... EMPIRICAL PROOF!
If that is your purpose, there is an insane mountain of material...
(And I am at your disposal to bring some of it back for suitable mounting to what I presume is your target audience.)
And what is worse, is some very tall people.
Speaking of which...
But if it helps, I tend to agree with Velikovsky's catastrophism... not that it applies to subatomic physics...
Velikovsky's entry into this discourse has absolutely zero to do with the major theme the 'Establishment' semitards want to saddle him with...
Anyone that has been anywhere in the same zip code as ANY of his publications would understand that the man essentially rewrote everything he came in
So, one can only guess, you only have a Wikipedic quick lookup knowledge of Immanuel Velikovsky and you're reference to 'subatomic physics'... what is
that, except maybe at best some kind of canard?
As to 'Brownian motion'... LOOK at the scaling guy... It can NOT be any type of molecular jarring... (molecules are just a little bit TOO
Brownian motion is randomly-zig-zagging molecules pushing other things around, from atoms to other molecules to macroscopic bits of debris. It
increases with heat... or does heat increase with it? What is heat? Energy transferrence via photons at certain wavelengths (like infrared). Hot
things glow; the hotter, the higher the frequency of the emitted light. So heat and photonic activity are the same thing. Perhaps it isn't friction
alone. Atoms store light and release it; electrons and quantum leaps. Heat must be the same thing.
But the motion itself? The cause of that effect? All I can think of is string vibrations slinging matter around and the conservation of angular
momentum in orbiting matter. But it could be something else. I haven't thought much about this part of it before.
I'm sorry Thought Provoker. ^----- That is one whole lot of sheer nonsense.
I could only respond that it's a fairly safe bet that you're probably NOT going to be the guy to lead us out of the continued Dark Ages that is this
Being a nuts and bolts kind of guy, I was wondering when we get to the lab part of this exercise that is your thread?
You know... When we actually DO something besides demonstrating our prowess at cutting-n-pasting?
edit on 19-1-2013 by golemina because: Word omission & quotes bracketing.