It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Understanding Gravity (and more)

page: 11
<< 8  9  10   >>

log in


posted on Jan, 26 2013 @ 03:03 PM
Here is the google plus community page of Tetryonics. ABRAHAM has discovered what Gravity is.

Once the Geometry has been firmly established, which it has via the understanding of Equilateral Energy confusion ceases to exist.

Tetryonic theory is founded on the equilateral geometry of Planck energy quanta,
where the square quantum numbers of Physics are in fact equilateral geometries. These h quanta combine to create a 'fabric' of
mass-Energy over the geometric framework that Charge interaction creates and the number of h quanta per charge fascia is what gives
us the de Broglie, Compton frequencies, momenta etc of Matter itself. mass-Energies are 2D planar EM fields and Matter is a 3D
standing-wave geometry made up up [n]pi square number Planck mass-Energy geometries. --ABRAHAM

Gravity is covered in Tetryonics [4] Cosmology.pdf
Download Now. FREE FREE FREE. nothing tastes better than free.

Boskovic is famous for his atomic theory and made many important contributions to astronomy. including the first geometric precedure for determining the equator of a rotating planet from three observations of a surface feature and computing the orbit of a planet from three observations of its position. In 1753 he also discovered the absence of atmosphere on the Moon.

He also proposed that attractive Gravitational fields could be explained as diminished interactive EM fields. In 1745 Boskovic published "De Viribus Vivis" in wihch he tried to find a middle way between Isaac Newton's gravitational theory and Gottfried Leibniz's metaphysical
theory of the monad-point. --ABRAHAM

Tetryonics Google + Community Link
edit on 26-1-2013 by shixta because: typo

posted on Jan, 30 2013 @ 02:03 PM

Originally posted by Thought Provoker
reply to post by subtleperspective

I think it possible that... well, black holes "evaporate." It's like the matter falls through the singularity and "goes away." This caused Hawking's "Information Paradox" that confused everyone for years. He explained it one way; this could explain it another: if the matter is converted to energy as it passes through the singularity, that energy could be dispersed into some kind of sub-dimensional "power grid" that distributes the energy evenly over all of space-time. Add up all the matter being converted by the evaporation of every black hole in the universe. Probably pretty big.

But I'm also a Christian (non-denominational). I don't pretend to know what God is, but he too could be feeding us all that energy, like underground irrigation.

Whatever the source of the vacuum energy, it's there. It's real. Perhaps we'll find out one day... but it shouldn't get in the way of understanding and controlling it as Tesla predicted we would someday.

As you observed in your OP's, most of everything is nothing - 99.999999999999999% of all matter is "empty space". If, on the other hand, there are actually other "universes" existing in the space between subatomic particles - subatomic particles of "other wheres" only APPEARING to be empty space because we are not tuned to observe them - then the energy itself could be simply being passed between "other wheres". It would be neither newly created, nor would it ever actually cease to exist. It would just "change frequency", re-tune itself to be observed and act in one of the "other wheres". With constant loss of our own "wind", and constant replenishment of it from the "other wheres", it would appear as if it were always "on" here (not just "here", but the same effect would be occurring in all of the "other wheres"), and always in motion.

posted on Jan, 30 2013 @ 02:10 PM

Originally posted by Thought Provoker
reply to post by kwakakev

As in, how like charges repel and opposites attract? Hmm. Lightning... the electron charges go from the ground up... pulled along a conductor towards the lack of electrons up above... by golly, that might be a different force, unless it's "in disguise," like magnetism. What imbalance is it that causes electrons to always move towards the more-positive side in a conductor? The force of the electrons in the power source, pushing them, repelling them rather. Least resistance means, if there's a hole for them in the opposite direction from whence they're being pushed, they'll go into that hole. And on and on, until it can't move any more. Lightning isn't pulled into the sky by the clouds; lightning is pushed into the air through whatever water drops and air gaps can conduct electricity. Wow; I guess everything is the opposite of what we think.

And it must be like magnetism, operating over small (single-atom) distances, via valence shells. Electrons must have some special shape, or property, that "shields the wind" in a slightly different way, to cause an effect that only pushes electrons. It's like... a wind within the wind, a wind that ignores everything but charged particles. Maybe a "positive" particle is just "less negative." Less energized. And there's not really any such thing as a "positive charge," like how shadows are the absence of a substance rather than a distinct substance of their own. Magnetism, gravity, and electricity; the same mechanism, but acting differently on different things as well as at different scales...

Thank you very much. That never would've occurred to me.

Energy emitters vs. energy sinks. "Gateways between other wheres".

One theory of electricity involves the flow of electrons, but another involves the flow of "electron holes". It's the difference between being an electronic tech and an electronic engineer.

<< 8  9  10   >>

log in