MSNBC Video SandyHook: No Assault Rifle : Four Hand Guns

sooo now there is ANOTHER version of the story...which, sorta funny, is very much like the first info that came out..no assault rifle used by lanza...just handguns. now sit back and think about it..IF this is going to be the 'official' story....the lies and deciet go much much further. how could the media and law enforcement and the medicail examiner be so wrong? or were they suppose to be or were they 'coached'?

was the story purpousefully skewd to say that an assault style rifle was used? and now look at what the pres is gunna do..EOs to circumvent congress...

and IF this info and story are what the 'officials' will be staying with it just makes the conspiracy that much more believable...and should make people question even more, the truthfullness of the media and any 'govt official'.....we dont have to look for any type of conspiracy...its right in front of us for all to see...

Officials in the federal and local governments always report all the information, don't withhold information for their own agenda, and never give out misleading or even false information. They can be trusted absolutely.

Yes, that is it.

Originally posted by roadgravel
Officials in the federal and local governments always report all the information, don't withhold information for their own agenda, and never give out misleading or even false information. They can be trusted absolutely.

Yes, that is it.

Add to that that the Media never goes off half-cocked, creates sensational tension and grief, or uses their position of trust to create social stress....

and that the "influence peddlers" in government don't see any human tragedy as an "opportunity" for social engineering....

and yeah... you're right....

jeesus, i asked that question a few times....
The reported four handguns are then the murder weapons o not?
Was this burried in the MSM, or is it a mistake...?

Originally posted by stirling
jeesus, i asked that question a few times....
The reported four handguns are then the murder weapons o not?
Was this burried in the MSM, or is it a mistake...?

Who knows? That is why we got multiple stories and a changing story from the start. They want to make sure that we didn't know what to believe, so when they come out with a final version...we can say....

Who knows?

Just an update there is still nothing, all day in the local media about this particular story, not one person down at the Capitol had heard of it outside of MSNBC and not one of our local stations including the local NBC affiliate is reporting anything like it..

Just a notation.

This story stinks worse than a whorehouse at low tide!

Originally posted by dreammerchant
This story stinks worse than a whorehouse at low tide!

Come on! That was a honey!

I am surprised no one has asked this: What is the date on that video? Its not from today. its not from last week. I saw it weeks ago, and even then it wasnt fresh. So when is it from? Because it is the ONLY video that makes this claim.

ETA: According to the site it is from December 15th. So whats to say this was nothing more than, once again, bad reporting?

reply to post by captaintyinknots

Ya know, I could swear when I looked at it earlier it said Jan 15th, but I do need new contact lenses.

The date of Dec. 15th makes more since to me. That little clip at the end about an argument, when I search for a source on that I think the article I found was from the Dec 15 also.

Thanks for ringing my bell on that!

Originally posted by captaintyinknots
I am surprised no one has asked this: What is the date on that video? Its not from today. its not from last week. I saw it weeks ago, and even then it wasnt fresh. So when is it from? Because it is the ONLY video that makes this claim.

ETA: According to the site it is from December 15th. So whats to say this was nothing more than, once again, bad reporting?

edit on 16-1-2013 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)

Exactly - this was one day after the shooting - when all kinds of contradictory information was getting out in the media. The latest news out there (to my knowledge) is that an AR-15 was the primary weapon used in the shootings.

The primary weapon used in the attack was a "Bushmaster AR-15 assault-type weapon," said Connecticut State Police Lt. Paul Vance.

www.cnn.com...

ETA - this is old, INACCURATE news. I think thread should be closed.

reply to post by R_Clark


I dont care how anyone wants to try and spin it but the most interesting, if not disturbing, video by far is the one of the Father laughing and smiling during a press conference, just 1 day after his child was shot.
If my kid had been shot, I wouldnt come out of my house for a week, much less give press conferences.

Just remember that the authorities haven`t released a report of their investigation yet, all of these conflicting stories of what type of weapons were used and how many of them were found are stories that have been put out there by the media.
if you believe any of these stories then you are believing media speculation and not the official completed investigation report,because the report hasn`t been completed or released yet.
after the report is released then we will know which media stories were lies,speculation and sensationalization.

who would have a more accurate account of exactly what weapons were found int he school, the investigators who actually went into the school or the media who were standing outside, and far away from the school?

i`m going to wait for the completed report and i expect that it will clear up all these media created contradictions.

Originally posted by Maxmars

The Media jumped at the tragedy, and the political cabal "made use" of the tragedy - as they always do.

No conspiracy, no "plan," just media and political opportunistic manipulation of public perception.....

edit on 16-1-2013 by Maxmars because: (no reason given)

Comments like that will get you a mysterious case of cancer that only 3 other people are known to have gotten which is completely out of your genetic make up, child porn on your computer from sites that never existed, and then the bad'll begin when the media gets ahold of you!

The TRUTH was well spoken! Here here!

Odd how folks just can't see the truth you so eloquently stated.

Derek

reply to post by R_Clark


Four handguns were used by Thomas Hamilton in the first and last UK handgun killing spree sixteen years ago.

Dunblaine Primary School Massacre

Sixteen children were killed with two legally held 9mm Brownings and two .357 magnum revolvers.

The result was a total ban on handgun ownership and sale in the UK within a year.

In 1987 the Hungerford massacre had already lead to a ban of all semi auto centrefire rifles when Michael Ryan killed sixteen random victims.

this is not the media changing their story, this video was posted on december 15th... it seems like a lot of people in here are under the impression this video aired today and that the MSM are admitting no assault rifle was used..

The official story on the Sandy hook shooting tragedy that spurred the push for new gun legislation and another assault weapon ban is slowly changing.

Now we find out that the evil assault weapon....The Bushmaster he supposedly used was never even taken out of the car trunk, taken into the school, nor was it used in the shooting and better yet.......

THERE WAS NO BUSHMASTER PERIOD AT THE SCENE..... another lie to push the assault weapon ban.

He carried 4 handguns into the school.

That means that the first reports were either grossly wrong or flat out lies to push their agenda.

The medical examiner who testified that a rifle was used in the killings is either grossly incompetent in his profession or he just plain lied.

The first video you can see them removing the rifle from the trunk and it is not even an AR15 as claimed.
(he is working the bolt from the side to clear the rifle, an AR15 charging handle in at the rear of the receiver and pulls straight back over the stock)
There was NEVER an assault rifle involved in the shooting ! www.youtube.com...



And in this new report you can see they admit that only pistols were used...... video.today.msnbc.msn.com...



Also when he tried to buy another weapon the current gun laws worked since he was denied the purchase.

The whole story just blows holes in the anti-gun peoples stories.

The conspiracy here has nothing to do with the shooting, a crazy guy went to the school and killed a bunch of people.

THEN, the government & media used made up facts to promote their agenda and lie to the American public once again. Pretty sick to use the deaths of a bunch of kids to push your agenda...

Sick bastards indeed.....this is our government at work.

And shame on all you who blindly follow them, your as bad as they are.

reply to post by mwood


That is the same video as the OP, and for the SECOND time, it is not a new video. It is a video from the day after the shooting.

reply to post by R_Clark


Waiit.. but what was with the shotgun in the car? What about them saying the victims were shot with .223?

So far I have heard about these guns in this case:
- Sig Sauer
- Glock
- Mystery handgun 3
- Mystery handgun 4
- AR15
- Saiga shotgun
- Henry repeating rifle
- Enfield

So now I have heard about 8 guns. What is the truth?

reply to post by mwood


In that video it is not an an AR15, it is a Saiga shotgun.