It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Biden: Obama Considering 'Executive Order' to Deal With Guns

page: 15
70
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 10:20 AM
link   
www.thisnation.com...

just a short thingy on what an EO is for those that dont know....

one of barrys campaign lies was more transparency in govt....i guess making an EO 'dealing' with the 'gun issue'...is pretty transparent...."ill make all the descions, its for the govts...err ah..the citizens protection'




posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 10:22 AM
link   
Isn't this the sort of behavior the second amendment was design to protect us from?

Duh..



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 10:35 AM
link   
The way I see this is, if you take the guns it is to restrict the potential for the Crimes that have been committed recently to occur now I'm not for the ban nor against it its hard for me to judge as I'm not a US citizen, it was interesting to note that the fire arms mentioned from the Alex Jones Video I Saw was the same type of weapon, now if it is a conspiracy wouldn't you say the same use of rifle is convenient to impose the ban of fire arms and the location of these shootings, this ban is it just for auto weapons or all fire arms ? (I know firepower is significantly reduced I'm just asking a Question)

Gun crime is small over here in UK however we are not allowed fire arms yet people still get a hold of them and they are used .......

^^^ makes a ban semi redundant ^^^

Seems with all the talk of banning firearms there is an increase in shootings in the US; convenient.

I hope this judgement is wrong but if not take care all of you state side take care it can't be good....



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 11:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by Screwed
Sorry if this is already posted, I honestly didn't even take the time to check.
My heart is pounding out of my chest right now.
Here it is people!!!!
The moment we've been waiting for is finally here.



Vice President Joe Biden revealed that President Barack Obama might use an executive order to deal with guns.





"The president is going to act," said Biden, giving some comments to the press before a meeting with victims of gun violence. "There are executives orders, there's executive action that can be taken. We haven't decided what that is yet. But we're compiling it all with the help of the attorney general and the rest of the cabinet members as well as legislative action that we believe is required."





Link


Like so many before him,
He is making the power grab and installing himsef as dictator.
Civil War is on the way if he does this.
There are just too many people who won't turn them in.
And there are so many who will turn on their friends,neighbors,and loved ones who refuse to turn them in.
They will be villified in the news and reduced to being called terrorists and enemies of freedom.
"They are endangering our children"
"They MUST BE STOPPED"!!!

I can hear it all now.
I am sick to my stomach.
Your thoughts????


Edit to add: ##SNIPPED## This needs maximum exposure and we need all hands on deck with this one. This is a converstaion which needs as many players as possible.
edit on 9-1-2013 by Screwed because: (no reason given)

edit on Wed Jan 9 2013 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)



Gimme a break! The MAJORITY OF NRA MEMBERS want an assault weapons ban.. Which is whats gonna happen.. Nobody's trying to take guns away.. Civil war... gimme a break. You just hate a black President. Get over it. You'd rather watch babies get gunned down by assault rifles than have a black Leader of our Country dually voted in TWICE by a majority of the electorate. THAT IS FREEDOM! You sound awefully close to Al Quaeda.... You have BECOME what you fear... which is what racism and irrational fear does.. Look at yourself!!!



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 11:18 AM
link   
These days, as far as I am concerned, there are few things to admire about the Socialist, Bankrupt and Culturally Degenerating USA, but at least so far, one thing remains: the right to bear arms and use deadly force to defend one's self and possessions.

Most Americans are culturally and prospectively "Land Locked" and only know what they have been taught and told by the extremely subverted education system, who have re-written history to serve the goals of the Carnegie Trust Cabal and corrupted media but for those who have spent time in Europe and in particularly Russia who have already been where these Deluded Marxist that have seized our government would like to take the USA.

This will probably come as a total shock to most here in the USA, but at one point, Russia was one of the most heavily armed societies on earth. This was, of course, when they were free under the Tsar. Weapons, from swords and spears to pistols, rifles and shotguns were everywhere, common items. People carried them concealed, they carried them holstered. Fighting knives were a prominent part of many traditional attires and those little tubes criss crossing on the costumes of Cossacks and various Caucasian peoples? Well those are bullet holders for rifles.

Various armies, such as the Poles, during the Смута (Times of Troubles), or Napoleon, or the Germans even as the Tsarist state collapsed under the weight of WW1 and Wall Street monies, found that holding Russian lands was much much harder than taking them and taking was no easy walk in the park but a blood bath all its own. In holding, one faced an extremely well armed and aggressive population Hell bent on exterminating or driving out the aggressor.

This well armed population was what allowed the various White factions to rise up, no matter how disorganized politically and militarily they were in 1918 and wage a savage civil war against the Reds. It should be noted that many of these armies were non-military; simply armed peasants, villagers, farmers and merchants, protecting their own, much like our forefathers in their war against British Rule. If it had not been for Washington's clandestine support of and for the Reds, history would have gone quite differently.

But enough about History. Listen to what England's Citizens have to say about their Gun Ban.


And for you "Closet Geniuses" who talk about the NRA Supporting an Assault Weapon Ban and going on and on and on about "Assault Weapons"...A ASSAULT WEAPON is an AUTOMATIC FIRE WEAPON (Machine Guns) and they have been banned for many years now except by special permit.


The weapons these Liars, Cheats and War Criminals are trying to take from the American People are Semi-Automatic.

And for those "Gun Grabbers" amongst you who think the "Sneak Attack" or incremental approach to Banning all guns is to go after Hi-Caliber Firearms; .45, .223, 30-06 etc, let me clue you in on smaller caliber firearms like the .22 and .32


Now, I would like to comment on the subject of Obama 2nd Term in office and his Swearing In Ceremony. As many noticed, Obama with the help of his Knights Malta Cohort Chef Justice John Roberts fudged his Oath Of Office the first time around and once again I fully expect Obama will find a way to avoid swearing a clean and clear oath to Support and Defend our Constitution against ALL Enemies, foreign and domestic. Obama has, is and will continue to subvert and violate his oath of office, as would clearly be the case if he uses his So-Called Executive Privileged to in effect INFRINGE UPON THE 2nd Amendment A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

I am one American who believes Obama and Justice Roberts should be impeached; the list is in fact long but here, on the issue of the 2nd Amendment and Obama's use of an Executive Order to circumvent his oath should finally be the clear and undeniable cause for Impeachment.
edit on 10-1-2013 by MajorKarma because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 11:24 AM
link   
Can't shake this feeling that during obamas inauguration there is going to be a staged event that will lock in his executive order on gun control, and that's the only way his order could go through without a fight.



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 11:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by sensible1
Gimme a break! The MAJORITY OF NRA MEMBERS want an assault weapons ban..

You should maybe get your info from somewhere other then the DailyKos or Media Matters. Your incorrect and uninformed.


Originally posted by sensible1
Which is whats gonna happen.. Nobody's trying to take guns away..

Which is it. Not going to happen, or it is?



Originally posted by sensible1
Civil war... gimme a break. You just hate a black President. Get over it.

I haven't seen the race card here for a while, guess it was due up from the Collectivist Progressive Left soon.
Your tired old crap is tired and old.



Originally posted by sensible1
You'd rather watch babies get gunned down by assault rifles than have a black Leader of our Country dually voted in TWICE by a majority of the electorate.

Oh????What!!!
Take your prozac and come back when it has kicked in.
There is no such thing as an "assault rifle" as any rifle, or any weapon, can be used to assault someone or something.



Originally posted by sensible1
THAT IS FREEDOM! You sound awefully close to Al Quaeda.... You have BECOME what you fear... which is what racism and irrational fear does.. Look at yourself!!!

Uh....Ok then. Sure sure.



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 11:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by sensible1

Gimme a break! The MAJORITY OF NRA MEMBERS want an assault weapons ban.. Which is whats gonna happen.. Nobody's trying to take guns away.. Civil war... gimme a break. You just hate a black President. Get over it. You'd rather watch babies get gunned down by assault rifles than have a black Leader of our Country dually voted in TWICE by a majority of the electorate. THAT IS FREEDOM! You sound awefully close to Al Quaeda.... You have BECOME what you fear... which is what racism and irrational fear does.. Look at yourself!!!


Excuse me! When was racism introduced as an issue dealing with second amendment, assumption of dictatorial powers or faulty elections.

NO ONE I've noticed says anything about his blackness but its fairgame to criticize his efforts to devalue our constitutional rights - is that not so? or does his blackness insulate him from any and all criticism of what many consider to be bad policy.

Just have to point out that a civil war was fought which allowed the reformation which indeed forced those who would take away 2A rights of blacks to cease and desist. You now have someone who wants to take them away and you support that? I'm speechless if thats the case. Not only a traitor to the constitution but also to his own people?



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 11:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by sensible1
THAT IS FREEDOM! You sound awefully close to Al Quaeda.... You have BECOME what you fear... which is what racism and irrational fear does.. Look at yourself!!!

Uh....Ok then. Sure sure.


Gee, you really told me!!!
edit on 10-1-2013 by sensible1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 11:36 AM
link   
reply to post by sensible1
 





Gimme a break! The MAJORITY OF NRA MEMBERS want an assault weapons ban..


no..........we already had an assault weapons ban and it didnt stop a damn thing........they are going for all guns......period, those of us who knwo the dif between an assault weapon and what they are proposing know what hthe end game is here.....

and if you were being intellectually honest you would too....

ar-15s are not assault weapons........

I have a 208 that ive used to hunt with for 8 years......it only LOOKS like an ar-15 because I changed what it LOOKS like.....it USE to just have a wood stock with scope.....now put a dif stock on it with a rail system for my atttatchments......but you people INSIST its an assault rifle , because your ignorance doesnt know the difference.......



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 11:37 AM
link   
reply to post by Screwed
 


To be honest this is simply an attack on gun lobbyist, such as the NRA. If one does not think that the NRA is a powerful organization that "cares" about the second amendment you are wrong. They care about sales and the bottom dollar of their weapons. They care nothing about the second amendments rights to have a well "regulated militia". Where are the well regulated militias being run by the NRA? Where are the well regulated militia's by the gun lobbyist? Oh wait, their only selling to individuals and the military (which is not the militia described in the 2nd)... there are no gun militia's run by the gun lobbyist.



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 11:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by Phoenix

Originally posted by sensible1

Gimme a break! The MAJORITY OF NRA MEMBERS want an assault weapons ban.. Which is whats gonna happen.. Nobody's trying to take guns away.. Civil war... gimme a break. You just hate a black President. Get over it. You'd rather watch babies get gunned down by assault rifles than have a black Leader of our Country dually voted in TWICE by a majority of the electorate. THAT IS FREEDOM! You sound awefully close to Al Quaeda.... You have BECOME what you fear... which is what racism and irrational fear does.. Look at yourself!!!


Excuse me! When was racism introduced as an issue dealing with second amendment, assumption of dictatorial powers or faulty elections.

NO ONE I've noticed says anything about his blackness but its fairgame to criticize his efforts to devalue our constitutional rights - is that not so? or does his blackness insulate him from any and all criticism of what many consider to be bad policy.

Just have to point out that a civil war was fought which allowed the reformation which indeed forced those who would take away 2A rights of blacks to cease and desist. You now have someone who wants to take them away and you support that? I'm speechless if thats the case. Not only a traitor to the constitution but also to his own people?



A NEW CIVIL WAR ??? When was race injected???

Are you serious???

The first one was fought by MILITIAS who were ARMED to fight the GOVT because they had a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT at the time to own black slaves!!! According to the HOLY CONSTITUTION...a black man was 2/3 of a man...

Just because its in the Constitution doesn't mean its right. Lot of good the 2nd amendment did the first go round..

100's of Thousands of Americans dead. So that racists can keep doing their thing.


And its the same thing this time. The OP is calling for a race war.

edit on 10-1-2013 by sensible1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 11:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by sensible1
 





Gimme a break! The MAJORITY OF NRA MEMBERS want an assault weapons ban..


no..........we already had an assault weapons ban and it didnt stop a damn thing........they are going for all guns......period, those of us who knwo the dif between an assault weapon and what they are proposing know what hthe end game is here.....

and if you were being intellectually honest you would too....

ar-15s are not assault weapons........

I have a 208 that ive used to hunt with for 8 years......it only LOOKS like an ar-15 because I changed what it LOOKS like.....it USE to just have a wood stock with scope.....now put a dif stock on it with a rail system for my atttatchments......but you people INSIST its an assault rifle , because your ignorance doesnt know the difference.......




The NRA members themselves have been polled and disagree. Its just numbers.



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 11:51 AM
link   
reply to post by sensible1
 


You really are clueless.


The Civil War was fought over States Rights.
Slavery just happen to be the straw that broke the camels back.

Back under the bridge with you!!!!



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 11:52 AM
link   
Mods, I believe this thread should be closed because it appears that the posters are calling for violence against the US. This is dangerous.



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 11:52 AM
link   
The way I see it, considering the source... Biden... we should take it with a grain of salt and wait to see what happens before we get our panties in a twist. That man says some of the most ridiculious things, Im surprised he is alowed to speak in front of news crews again.



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 11:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by macman
reply to post by sensible1
 


You really are clueless.


The Civil War was fought over States Rights.
Slavery just happen to be the straw that broke the camels back.

Back under the bridge with you!!!!


Yes a State's rights to ENSLAVE others.. You think that a good thing? A righteous thing? Just because its a RIGHT doesn't mean its RIGHT.. The 2nd amendment is an AMENDMENT... Which means its a change to the original.... So by definition you are saying it was a Necessesary change to the Constitution because of a change in the times...



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 11:57 AM
link   
reply to post by sensible1
 


If you actually took the time to go read the history of why the clause was put into the constitution when written which can be found in the federalists papers then you'd understand it was a compromise needed to get the southern colonies to agree to form a nation.

That has no bearing on the utility nor legitimacy of the second amendment.

The issue among others was paid for with over 600,000 casulties in the civil war. Part of the reformation was ensuring blacks were afforded their second amendment rights along with participation in elections - yes admittedly it took a long time, right into the next century - I still say Obama is undoing your rights as well as mine no matter the color or creed.

Simply put my stand for rights is a stand for yours also.



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 11:58 AM
link   
OK, this is my first post and I just had to say something about this, as I like to read to stuff on ATS occasionally, and all of the good content seems to be going to hell.
Who the [snipped] are you kidding? Civil war? Really? I've spent a year in your freaking country and let me tell you, if there's an executive order to ban guns, you're all just gonna sit there and take it. I don't see any of you going out of your comfort zone to fight for the right to bear arms. So stop kidding yourselves, stop filling ATS with US related BS and tell us something we don't know, and would like to hear, instead of acting all tough when you aren't. And after all, I live in a democratic country in which it's almost impossible to get a gun license - do you see people from other nations constantly whining about it?
edit on Thu Jan 10 2013 by DontTreadOnMe because: Mod Note: Do Not Evade the Automatic Censors



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 12:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by sensible1
Yes a State's rights to ENSLAVE others.. You think that a good thing? A righteous thing?

Thought you wanted this thread shut down?
Slavery, whether it be to a person or a Govt, is wrong.



Originally posted by sensible1
Just because its a RIGHT doesn't mean its RIGHT.. The 2nd amendment is an AMENDMENT... Which means its a change to the original.... So by definition you are saying it was a Necessesary change to the Constitution because of a change in the times...

It was an addition to it.
If you want it changed, push for the correct way, a Constitutional Convention.
Otherwise, the actions of the Liberal Progressive Marxist 0bama are unlawful, in regards to firearms.
Along with any law restricting firearms in any way.



new topics

top topics



 
70
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join