It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phoenix
reply to post by sensible1
If you actually took the time to go read the history of why the clause was put into the constitution when written which can be found in the federalists papers then you'd understand it was a compromise needed to get the southern colonies to agree to form a nation.
That has no bearing on the utility nor legitimacy of the second amendment.
The issue among others was paid for with over 600,000 casulties in the civil war. Part of the reformation was ensuring blacks were afforded their second amendment rights along with participation in elections - yes admittedly it took a long time, right into the next century - I still say Obama is undoing your rights as well as mine no matter the color or creed.
Simply put my stand for rights is a stand for yours also.
Originally posted by sensible1
Originally posted by Phoenix
reply to post by sensible1
If you actually took the time to go read the history of why the clause was put into the constitution when written which can be found in the federalists papers then you'd understand it was a compromise needed to get the southern colonies to agree to form a nation.
That has no bearing on the utility nor legitimacy of the second amendment.
The issue among others was paid for with over 600,000 casulties in the civil war. Part of the reformation was ensuring blacks were afforded their second amendment rights along with participation in elections - yes admittedly it took a long time, right into the next century - I still say Obama is undoing your rights as well as mine no matter the color or creed.
Simply put my stand for rights is a stand for yours also.
Yeah thats what the slave owners said, they were "fighting for the rights of the slaves.."
NO THANK YOU.
Originally posted by CaptainBeno
reply to post by Masterjaden
Yeah! whoa! Those home invading Deer must be a real problem in America yeah? Pesky at best! And as for those moose! You can't even walk the streets!
You do sound stupid..........
Please
Stop.
Originally posted by Cynicaleye
How anybody in this thread can be against inproved gun regulation is beyond me. After all the massacres, all the innocent lives lost, you still can't see past your imaginary war with the goverment. It's disgusting, but I now realise there's no way of getting through to you. Perhaps part of this vendetta against Obama is racial, I didn't see this type of hate against Bush administration. Then he again he was republican..edit on 10-1-2013 by Cynicaleye because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by kozmo
Originally posted by TheFlash
reply to post by Screwed
If you fail to respect the law and the duly elected democratic government then you are an insurgent, just like the ones in the Middle East.
in·sur·gent [in-sur-juh nt]
noun
1. a person who rises in forcible opposition to lawful authority, especially a person who engages in armed resistance to a government or to the execution of its laws; rebel.
Luckily, our founding documents guarantee the right of the people to be "insurgents".
You'd do well to actually READ these founding documents instead of parroting some stupid liberal talking point!
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--
Sounds VERY clear and concise to me. I can't see how anyone can "lawyer" their way around that!
Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
reply to post by LittleBlackEagle
An executive order that violates the bill of rights is null and void.
Bypassing Congress to revise or delete the 2nd Amendment is a treasonable act. Disagree?
edit on 1/9/2013 by sad_eyed_lady because: punctuation
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
Originally posted by beezzer
If the idiot who killed all those people in Sandy Hook had a knife, or a sharp stick, or a rock, or a hammer instead of a gun we'd all be discussing the deplorable state of the mental health services in America.
But we're focusing on the weapon the killer used instead of the killer.
Agenda?
you're getting warmer...
(so close!)
:-)
Why do I feel like I'm playing Marco Polo and the prize is. . . the truth!
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by Cynicaleye
Originally posted by Cynicaleye
And? How often and how many people actually use and know how to make bombs?
Originally posted by Cynicaleye
Very few, anybody can get access to a gun. Yes, people will still find a way to kill however they will kill far less without a fully automatic machine gun.
Originally posted by Cynicaleye
I can't reason with people like you, because you have an un-healthy obsession with guns which is shown by your constant and desperate defending of them.
Originally posted by Cynicaleye
Your avatar further confirms this, you don't really care about the military, you just like how they get paid to go and kill foreigners and you think they are heroes because of this.
Originally posted by Cynicaleye
reply to post by macman
Who has used automatic guns to kill people in the US? please tell me your joking..
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by Cynicaleye
I can't reason with people like you, because you have an un-healthy obsession with guns which is shown by your constant and desperate defending of them.
It is a right guaranteed by the Constitution and Bill of Rights.