It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by intrepid
58 deaths in a year and a half? And that would be different from any other large American city? Reading the article the student killed are usually caught in a gang action. Innocents aren't being targeted like those kids in Conn were. I'm saddened and somewhat sickened that some Americans think more about gun ownership than they do innocent people getting murdered. This happens damn near monthly and we are always back to these old arguments. Nothing is solved. I have a question for all the proponents, when the next mass shooting happens, probably some time in Jan., are you going to have any feeling for those innocents that are about to die?
Originally posted by beezzer
Where was the outcry for these deaths?
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by beezzer
Where was the outcry for these deaths?
You're talking about 58 deaths in 17 MONTHS. I'm talking over 20 deaths in 17 MINUTES. You can't see the difference? As to, "If guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns" BS I have 2 responses. What says that if Chicago was gun cool that those stats wouldn't have been higher? Secondly, what do YOUR guns do to stop this madness? Nothing. Right.
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by VictorVonDoom
It is because of responses like these that I am swinging towards gun control.
Is Virginia the Cause of DC's Problems?
Washington, D.C. has, perhaps, the most restrictive gun control laws in the country, and yet it has one of the highest murder rates in the nation.
Critics claim criminals merely get their guns in Virginia where the laws are more relaxed. This, they argue, is why the D.C. gun ban is not working.
Perhaps criminals do get their guns in Virginia, but this overlooks one point: If the availability of guns in Virginia is the root of D.C.'s problems, why does Virginia not have the same murder and crime rate as the District? Virginia is awash in guns and yet the murder rate is much, much lower. This holds true even for Virginia's urban areas, as seen by the following comparison on the 25-year anniversary of the DC gun ban (in 2001):
Murder rates: 25 years after DC's ban
Washington, DC
46.4 per 100,0001
Arlington, VA
2.1 per 100,0002
(Arlington is just across the river from D.C.)
Total VA metropolitan area
6.1 per 100,0003
Guns are not the problem. On the contrary, lax criminal penalties and laws that disarm the law-abiding are responsible for giving criminals a safer working environment
Originally posted by beezzer
The death of any child should never be taken out of context.
...
Originally posted by WanDash
Guns can kill instantly... Cars can kill instantly... Where's the outcry against cars? Where's the outcry against "bad drivers"?
Originally posted by intrepid
OK. I'll use one of the gun advocates arguments then. If someone wants to defend themselves they will just do it with something other than a gun. Sounds lame, doesn't it? Same as saying that if someone is going to kill they will just find another way.
Originally posted by intrepid
Another meaningless justification. Does the "bad driver" get in his car and say to himself, "I'm gonna kill me some people today." Does a gunman say to himself, "I'm shooting me some people today. I sure hope I don't kill anyone." Ridiculous.
Originally posted by intrepid
You brought up the cars, not me. And yes, intent is highly important in this. One is a stupid lapse in judgement. One is the intent to kill people. Secondly there seems to be a lot more bodies in a shooting than in a car crash.
Originally posted by intrepid
reply to post by VictorVonDoom
OK. I'll use one of the gun advocates arguments then. If someone wants to defend themselves they will just do it with something other than a gun. Sounds lame, doesn't it? Same as saying that if someone is going to kill they will just find another way.
Originally posted by VictorVonDoom
You're right, that does sound kind of lame.
But then, as I recall Hitler found it expensive to shoot six million Jews. He thought gas chambers were far more economical. So maybe if someone is determined to kill they will find another way.edit on 19-12-2012 by VictorVonDoom because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by VictorVonDoom
...If giving up guns will make us safer, then why don't cops give up theirs for their safety? I mean, cops don't need guns to do their jobs, they just need guns to protect themselves while they do their jobs. If Americans are expected to protect themselves whithout guns, can we ask no less of law enforcement officials?
...