posted on Dec, 5 2012 @ 12:39 PM
Thank you all for your input: The good, the bad, the ugly, and the complacent.
It's been a heck of a ride...this has been the most exhausting thread I've ever done. The day I wrote it, I spent over 4 hours babysitting it.
Yesterday, almost 12 hours, and most of that was fighting to keep it from being hijacked.
When one puts out a "conspiracy theory", it is expected that one will get attacked, ridiculed, bashed, flamed, and sometimes, thank God, supported
and patted on the back. All in a day's work on ATS (or two, or three...).
I had wanted to put this out there for a long time, because it started to dawn on me that something is greatly amiss. It started when I learned that
cholesterol was necessary to make vitamin D (among its many other functions), and how vitamin D is the missing piece for people struggling with things
like cancer and other chronic diseases.
If cholesterol is so necessary, why is it being villified as a monster to be wiped out, the less of it, the better?
Why are parents told to put sunscreen on their kids every time they step outside the door? Why are so-called "experts" saying that everybody needs
to be on statins? Why are healthy people, with no sign of heart disease, put on this drug? I know that big pharma is greedy, but this seems to be
bigger than plain old corporate greed.
I started to think that, by eliminating vitamin D, it is a sure method of soft kill. To elaborate, "hard kill" means that somebody is killed on the
spot. "Soft kill" means that you kill somebody, slowly, over time, so that they have no idea what is happening to them, they just get sick, and die
sooner than they normally would have. For example, slowly poisoning somebody's food, so that, over time, the poison builds up until they can no
longer function, and they die.
We are being assaulted on many levels by toxins in our environment, food, water and air. Some people, though, are pretty hardy, and can withstand this
poisoning. To make a eugenics program such as this more effective, it is necessary to damage the immune system, to cripple it from within, so that
the outer toxins can take root and cause things like coronary artery disease / heart attacks, cancer, diabetes, etc.
Diabolical? Certainly. Evil? Of course. Plausible? I think so.
The fact that the cancer wards are full, not just the adult wards, but sadly enough, the pediatric wards, says volumes to me. The fact that most of
us are either "pre-diabetic" or diabetic is telling. Most of us are physically sick. We have come to accept this as "normal", but it
If every so-called health expert that is sanctioned by the state is telling us to live a certain way, and eat a certain way, and yet a lot of us are
still struggling with weight, fatigue, disease, and depression, somthing is definitely amiss.
I started thinking this way after seeing a banned episode of The Men Who Killed Kennedy, with Judyth Vary Baker explaining how she was involved in a
government program to create galloping cancer culled from cancer cells of mice. She came up with the idea that, by bombarding unsuspecting subjects
with a lot of x-rays, she could bring the immune system down so the cancer would take hold more readily. She was told that it was to take out Castro,
so she was a willing participant in a very bad thing.
I like Ms. Baker, BTW, she is a cyber friend of mine, and I believe every word she says.
Anyway, the idea of taking down the immune system isn't new. The methods are newer, but the idea is the same.
I put this thread out there to make people think. Are TPTB really concerned about our health and well-being, or are we being set-up (or pushed) into
a soft-kill situation because there are too many of us, and for what they're about to do, we need to be sick, tired and struggling in order for them
to pull it off?
Food for thought.