It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: turbonium1
Do you know the problem yet?
a reply to: Rob48
you appear to have failed to learn anything at all ,,,What a waste.
originally posted by: Misinformation
a reply to: Rob48
you appear to have failed to learn anything at all ,,,What a waste.
I dont think you understand, the hoax is very real ,and you have failed to accept the fact that your not dealing with your average moon hoax theorist , who otherwise would not have shown such extraordinary resilience to the deceptive fallacies of the propagandists...
you must not be cognisant that the knowledge you speak of is based upon the propagandists false paradigm for which you require rescue from...
a reply to: onebigmonkey
I'm not sure if there is a medical condition that involves reading words and putting extra ones there that weren't in the sentence in the first place, but you clearly have it.
a reply to: dragondridi
In order to pull off the hoax you presumed to happen would require technology even in advance of what we have today and cost far more than what was spent.
originally posted by: Misinformation
there ya go again, insinuating I've got dyslexia,,, so what if I do, I can neither confirm or deny it , everyone knows the hoax is real regardless,,, besides alot famous people happen to have been labeled dyslexic...Did Einstein have dyslexia
Its the propagandists that presume to know how much was spent , they refuse to even consider that other black projects might have occurred or that any advanced technology that NASA was unware of could even exist...
The Lunar Orbiter spacecraft launched before apollo had the capacity to exceed images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter launched in 2009.....Now I dont know about you,, but when a 50 year old spacecraft can collect better data than one launched in 2009 whos mission was basically the same,, it should send up red flags....
once again your LRO fallacy is debunked three ways & three days from sunday....
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: turbonium1
Space exploration is directed outward, not in reverse..let alone 40 years .. sheesh!
It's nonsense, but you take comfort in Apollo's fable.
if you say space exploration is directed outwards and not in reverse..
mind telling me what the purpose of the voyager missions were? rosetta probe? cassini?
or any of these:
en.wikipedia.org...
because that sure looks like they are exploring the solar system..
originally posted by: dragonridr
. In order to pull off the hoax you presumed to happen would require technology even in advance of what we have today and cost far more than what was spent. In order to put the stuff on the moon to fake the moon landing without astronauts would have been a technological wonder in and of itself.
originally posted by: DerekJR321
Are people seriously still debating this?
Hate to break it to you.. but there was no "hoax". Never has been, never will be. I've read every single bit of "evidence" that has been presented over the last several years and all of it is just nonsense. I've seen people swear up and down over "facts", that even elementary science could explain.
There are much better things to spend your time with.
if this evidence doesnt exist then it would seem all hoax theorists are mere propagandists.
originally posted by: turbonium1
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: turbonium1
Space exploration is directed outward, not in reverse..let alone 40 years .. sheesh!
It's nonsense, but you take comfort in Apollo's fable.
if you say space exploration is directed outwards and not in reverse..
mind telling me what the purpose of the voyager missions were? rosetta probe? cassini?
or any of these:
en.wikipedia.org...
because that sure looks like they are exploring the solar system..
Yes, but they are also exploring beyond the solar system, as well!
Unlike the Shuttle, stuck 40 years in LEO, with nothing beyond LEO.
Get it?
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: choos
if this evidence doesnt exist then it would seem all hoax theorists are mere propagandists.
well it is possible that the raw data itself was manufactured and this is how you would be able to fool many many people into believing it much like what is being discussed in this thread here...www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by: turbonium1
originally posted by: dragonridr
. In order to pull off the hoax you presumed to happen would require technology even in advance of what we have today and cost far more than what was spent. In order to put the stuff on the moon to fake the moon landing without astronauts would have been a technological wonder in and of itself.
The point is that NO stuff was put on the moon, that it was a hoax.... so, I don't know what you mean here.
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: choos
if this evidence doesnt exist then it would seem all hoax theorists are mere propagandists.
well it is possible that the raw data itself was manufactured and this is how you would be able to fool many many people into believing it much like what is being discussed in this thread here...www.abovetopsecret.com...
so thousands upon thousands of scientists are in on the moon landing hoax..
including thousands upon thousands of new scientists that need to be in on the hoax when they join the field??
how do they keep such numbers quiet for over 40 years??
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: choos
if this evidence doesnt exist then it would seem all hoax theorists are mere propagandists.
well it is possible that the raw data itself was manufactured and this is how you would be able to fool many many people into believing it much like what is being discussed in this thread here...www.abovetopsecret.com...
so thousands upon thousands of scientists are in on the moon landing hoax..
including thousands upon thousands of new scientists that need to be in on the hoax when they join the field??
how do they keep such numbers quiet for over 40 years??
did you read the thread i linked.?...the raw data is manipulated right from the get go thats how
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: choos
if this evidence doesnt exist then it would seem all hoax theorists are mere propagandists.
well it is possible that the raw data itself was manufactured and this is how you would be able to fool many many people into believing it much like what is being discussed in this thread here...www.abovetopsecret.com...
so thousands upon thousands of scientists are in on the moon landing hoax..
including thousands upon thousands of new scientists that need to be in on the hoax when they join the field??
how do they keep such numbers quiet for over 40 years??
did you read the thread i linked.?...the raw data is manipulated right from the get go thats how