I have done some expansion of the work done by Stanley V. Byers. I understand his theory is called the Radiant Pressure Model, I prefer to call it
the Prime Force Theory.
This theory postulates the existence of a single prime force, which is a radiant quantum vector with the following characteristics; infinite or near
infinite, magnitude, frequency, velocity and elasticity.
This radiation permeates all space, both in the vacuum and within all matter.
His theory did not have an extensive explanation for particles, simply considering them vortex's which both emit and absorb quantum frequencies.
I have done some thinking and developed a model of the electron.
I postulate that the electron consists of an inward spiral, controlled by the phi ratio. The spiral has 3D topography, but I am not at a point to
define it mathematically - it is sufficient to visualize it is a 2D object, a spiral in a plane, defined by inward curving vectors.
The spiral collects quantum radiation and causes it to converge, a spiral is an open curve, and the aperture of that spiral defines the frequency(ies)
that it can converge. At some point in the convergence of the vectors, they are unable to realize another wave, at that point the converging
radiation is emitted at normals to the plane of the spiral.
As a quick reminder, 3D radiation is a helix (corkscrew). Often radiation is presented in 2D as a sine wave, this is just a representation - the
actual radiation is a helix.
Therefore the electron emits both a right hand and left hand version of its emission, one from its north pole, one from its south - in every other
wave characteristic, they are identical. Just to clarify, I mean one wa ve turns clockwise, the other anti clockwise - regardless of orientation
these waves cannot be aligned, they are asymmetric.
One of these waves we call charge, the other we call magnetism - this left and right hand asymmetry is the basis for all electromagnetism. Charge and
magnetism are the same wave form, with reversed symmetry - this is the reason they are always associated.
edit on 13-11-2012 by Amagnon
because: (no reason given)