It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Instead, we know what was found and that's why interest disappeared faster than you can launch a kite!
Roswell is a joke and the gullible supporters are the jokesters. Stupidity reigns.
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
Can someone please explain to me why all these stupid conspiracy/UFO/Bigfoot, etc. websites ALL have to use black backgrounds with light type? That crap gives me eyestrain headaches. I'll pass.
Can someone please explain to me why all these stupid conspiracy/UFO/Bigfoot, etc. websites ALL have to use black backgrounds with light type? That crap gives me eyestrain headaches. I'll pass.
Originally posted by fleabit
Instead, we know what was found and that's why interest disappeared faster than you can launch a kite!
Roswell is a joke and the gullible supporters are the jokesters. Stupidity reigns.
No, you know what the military reported was found. They changed their story 2 more times. And you KNOW what they found? I don't think so. Friedman has put a lot of hard work and years into UFO research. He researched Roswell for some 10 years. He spent years in the archives in Washington to get answers. Quick buck artist? I don't think so.
There have been dozens of witnesses.. I don't know where you dug up a # that there are "more witnesses now" than previous. Care to share where you discovered a finite # of people that could have possibly been witnesses to events or people or stories in Roswell? That must have been a challenge to find, do share!
That the military itself reported they had captured a UFO.. when that particular airbase dealt with a wide range of aircraft, conventional and secret, speaks volumes. They said they found a flying DISK. Not the mess of a small weather balloon. It doesn't strike you as odd that officers in the military at the time could get it so wrong? So what.. you just accept their story? Even though they changed it? Repeatedly?
Who is the gullible one again?
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
Can someone please explain to me why all these stupid conspiracy/UFO/Bigfoot, etc. websites ALL have to use black backgrounds with light type? That crap gives me eyestrain headaches. I'll pass.
Originally posted by The Shrike
Originally posted by fleabit
Instead, we know what was found and that's why interest disappeared faster than you can launch a kite!
Roswell is a joke and the gullible supporters are the jokesters. Stupidity reigns.
No, you know what the military reported was found. They changed their story 2 more times. And you KNOW what they found? I don't think so. Friedman has put a lot of hard work and years into UFO research. He researched Roswell for some 10 years. He spent years in the archives in Washington to get answers. Quick buck artist? I don't think so.
There have been dozens of witnesses.. I don't know where you dug up a # that there are "more witnesses now" than previous. Care to share where you discovered a finite # of people that could have possibly been witnesses to events or people or stories in Roswell? That must have been a challenge to find, do share!
That the military itself reported they had captured a UFO.. when that particular airbase dealt with a wide range of aircraft, conventional and secret, speaks volumes. They said they found a flying DISK. Not the mess of a small weather balloon. It doesn't strike you as odd that officers in the military at the time could get it so wrong? So what.. you just accept their story? Even though they changed it? Repeatedly?
Who is the gullible one again?
You are a tyro and, therefore, you have no idea of what really happened in 1947. It's people such as yourself that keep the myth going. No UFO crashed near Roswell nor anywhere on earth. Find the evidence for your beliefs and Friedman has not put in years of "hard" work, he probably manufactured most if not all of what he report(ed)s.
Originally posted by greyer
reply to post by Frank Warren
Hello Frank, the story is having trouble loading on my browser but I will be looking into it.
I wanted to mention that in my UFO interest, when I am watching or listening to researchers in the field about good knowledge over the subject they are mentioning your name. I have heard them refer to your work in conferences and interviews and had noticed you were on ATS, thanks for posting this thread on Roswell.
A couple months ago I started listening to many interviews on Roswell. I find it interesting in this 1994 interview with Kevin Randle he says the UFO was a heel shaped object like the flying wing, and the aliens had pupils (maybe similar to the Betty and Barney Hill case). Yet I am not sure Don Schmitt agrees with this information and I had heard they once has a disagreement, and Kevin admits he was an Air Force intelligence officer - a person who would give us pieces of information and also disinfo. Kevin says he is 100% sure it was alien, 95% sure it was extraterrestrial, 4% sure it was interdimensional, and 1% it was time travelers..
Originally posted by MrInquisitive
reply to post by Frank Warren
For the record, this does not appear to be an interview, but a paraphrasing of what the interviewee may or may not have said, as every paragraph of the editor/interviewee is in third person. This is a very odd interview format and makes me question its veracity. OP'er, didn't you find this odd?
Originally posted by Jchristopher5
1. Did he make up the press release by the military that they had captured a flying disk? How do you explain this? Do you think, with your great intellect, that the most technologically advanced intelligence team would mistake a balloon, even a Mogul balloon, for a flying disk? That makes no sense. Since that is the beginning of the public story, it is a good place to start.
2. Did he "make up" the video testimony of Marcel, who handled the wreckage and was made a fool by the government cover story?
I just can't figure out if you are a paid hack, or if these are really your thoughts.
Originally posted by Bob Down Under
reply to post by FireMoon
There are more Roswell "witnesses" alive now than there were in 1947!
May be so but as a debunker you should do your home work and sort out whats legit or BS
Originally posted by Jchristopher5
snip
Originally posted by Frank Warren
snip
I can't speak to the percentages; however, Kevin has spent years absorbing the evidence and his opinion carries weight.
Cheers,
Frank
Originally posted by Ectoplasm8
Originally posted by Jchristopher5
1. Did he make up the press release by the military that they had captured a flying disk? How do you explain this? Do you think, with your great intellect, that the most technologically advanced intelligence team would mistake a balloon, even a Mogul balloon, for a flying disk? That makes no sense. Since that is the beginning of the public story, it is a good place to start.
2. Did he "make up" the video testimony of Marcel, who handled the wreckage and was made a fool by the government cover story?
Why do people continue to make this mistake? The Marcel site isn't connected to the actual claimed "crash site". Read again what Jesse Marcel Sr. and Jr. said they saw. Foil-like material and small i-beams. Remove the claims that the news photo is a cover-up, or the materials are something Marcel Sr. has never seen before and focus ONLY on the description. Foil and i-beams. The materials are exactly what weather balloons, or it's cargo, were made of at the time. What are the chances that a "spaceship" from another world comes to earth and crashes and just happens to be constructed of the same type of material? Not likely.
I just can't figure out if you are a paid hack, or if these are really your thoughts.
"Paid hack"edit on 1-11-2012 by Ectoplasm8 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by lyingunderoath
reply to post by Ectoplasm8
Hi, has anyone come across anyone who has done research on the foil material actually used for the balloons in '47? One aspect I remember some said the foil found at the site would have "memory",and rebound back to it's original shape. Did the foil the military use for the balloon reported to have been found have this aspect? I feel this is small, but an important description. No big deal today, but back in '47...