posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 10:15 PM
Thanks for proving my point. And ignoring the fact I didn't say 40 feet. and that the "outlandish" number was give by a witness and posted by
goodoldave whom I respect as a "debunker". Why dont you go tell him that. This isn't the first time I've had you come around and talk nonsense without
I realize that witness statements arnt always 100% accurate . As I said I've done lots of research on the towers but not much on 93.
900 feet at a 40 degree angle would make it ( and this is quick calculation) aprox 400 feet above the witness .now I understand that witnesses can't
be 100% accurate but to be off by 300 + feet or so also seems a little off.
But I thank you for your input and will probably be back to ask more questions when I have the time.
What do your calculations show?
edit on 2-1-2013 by Another_Nut because: (no reason given)
edit on 2-1-2013 by Another_Nut
because: (no reason given)