Millions watched as Jimmy Saville molested me

Originally posted by r2d246
Get real. She's moving around. There's no indication he's doing anything. He might be but we can't see anything. She could be strung out on drungs for all we know. And she's smiling the whole time, so if something is going on she loves it!

you appear to be completely clueless when it comes to reading body language. Either you are 16 or worse, an adult that's free in society with this restricted and seriously infantile perception of people's actions.

reply to post by eletheia


hey - i resemble this remark :

# Look at her facial expression and hand movement - that is not indecent assault

and stand by them - the level of irrational hysteria in this thread is mind blowing

you are not looking at any sort of credible evidence - the clip has been edited - why ??????

no one has even asked -

in-stead you are acting like a pack of pavlovian dogs - because someone has told you that an indecent assault occurred - you salivate and bay for blood

now back to facial expressions and hand movements - they are the key to this farce

if you touch someone - weather appropriatly or in appropriately - they a look - every dammed time

try it

second - expression - she is smiling and giggling - there is no " nervous laughter " there - as some claim

and lastly - hand movements - zero attempt to deflect the alledged groping hand

Many articles have come out in the British press citing victims and witnesses who consistently maintain that Savile, who held keys to morgues and children's wards in hospitals, was not only a serial paedophile, but also a necrophiliac and a "procurer" of victims for high rollers in British society.

Paedophila is rife in political establishments. Power brokers (the printers of money) use it to blackmail politicians. If the Savile scandal were pursued to its outer limits, I would not be in the least surprised if royals, including Prince Charles, were incriminated for child molestation and torture.

The elites are all psychopaths, and psychopathy is a job requirement if one wants to scale the heights in politics, media, etc. Savile is a dead guy getting thrown under the bus in hopes that the scandal will stop with his disgrace, and then fizzle out and die away, leaving all the other perps to continue their criminal behavior with impunity.

It occurs to me as I think about how we can get to the bottom of this "mess" is to put pressure on anyone accused to submit to a lie detector test...police use them all the time to determine someone's innocence. If any elected official refuses to take one, it is reasonable to assume they are "hiding" something.

Very few people are capable of cheating these tests if done properly, I honestly have never understood why they are not allowed to be used in courts? I understand we can't force people to take them, but we can certainly shun and reject them if they don't....people have a right to know what kind of people are making policy over thier lives.

An innocent person would welcome the opportunity to clear thier names, especially of such a horrble crime as abusing and raping children.

Originally posted by Amanda5
reply to post by ollncasino

 

I wonder where the spirit of this repugnant man is now? Makes you wonder whether there really is a hell and if he had a pass to get straight in.

Much Peace...

I found him...Dirty old bastard deserves to walk on his balls for all eternity in filth.

I'm up Scarb way this weekend, got half a mind go piss on his grave.

reply to post by MountainLaurel


I agree, and on top of that, anyone who wants to run for public office should be required to pass a psychopathy test. The number one problem we have in this world is that those who create the money, steer the corporations, and hire the politicians, are all psychopaths. They inhabit a parallel civilization whose very culture is rooted in psychopathy. Until we address this fundamental problem, we are doomed to repeat history.

Haven't gone through the whole thread yet, but just incase people still aren't sure who this creepy barsteward was you can check out these...




I understand if you don't want to waste and taint your lives with such putrid filth though.

reply to post by Suspiria


Nice. Here I refer to the first video. Trained and groomed media professionals with canned laff tracks deconstructing the scandal and shunting it off the side.

Nothing politically interesting here, folks! Take this as an aberration, a one-off, and do kindly move along please!

Originally posted by Farganne
reply to post by Suspiria

 

Nice. Here I refer to the first video. Trained and groomed media professionals with canned laff tracks deconstructing the scandal and shunting it off the side.

Nothing politically interesting here, folks! Take this as an aberration, a one-off, and do kindly move along please!

I'll let you have that....But hasn't everyone involved with the Auntie Beeb tried to halt the roller coaster? I admit I watched it and raised an eyebrow.

Anyway, as much as I'd like to dig him up, shove a spike up his arse and parade him round the streets like the olympic flame, in the spirit of ATS it's only fair to show both sides of the coin, so grudgingly I've dug this up from the winter after he'd snuffed it. No wonder Nicky Campbell got into a fluster when Paul Gaborchini called Saville a Necrophilliac, he seemed to be quite enamoured with the guy....

reply to post by Suspiria


Oh great. Jimmy the child molester has just got some fresh new cover.

Way to go.

Originally posted by Farganne
reply to post by Suspiria

 

Oh great. Jimmy the child molester has just got some fresh new cover.

Way to go.

Nahh, makes it worse, the fact that they actually pulled serious concerns to taint everyones Christmas viewing with that load of tripe. Still it helps to show people who aren't nesessarily in the know JUST how revered and seemingly untouchable this "Saint" *spits* was.....

Originally posted by 3chainz
reply to post by gort51

 

I remember a high school teacher that use to rub his hands up 14 year old girls legs, while they stood next to him at his desk.....Of course back then us young guys would be saying...lucky bugger he can do that....Not, oh look at that old perve...etc...It was different times (better), people were free, New York was a hovel, Rubbish and pollution was every where.....Well at least we cleaned that up....

Um, yeah thats creepy not to mention an ethics violation. You sound like a pedophile yourself.

I have to agree, that is messed up. It was not "the good old times" when criminals got away with groping yong girls.

And now....Edwina Currie making cryptic comments about how "We appointed a psychopath to, in effect, run a prison for the insane only I didn't know cos Savile has "something on the staff" that stopped them telling me that he (Savile) was indeed a psychopath.

Meanwhile, a contemporary member of Broadmoor staff to Savile's tenure, makes it plain he reported seeing Savile taking, in his words" an under-age looking girl wearing the sash from a local carnival float",alone, into the house he was provided at Broadmoor and watching as the lights were turned out. On making enquiries as to what had become of his report he was told "Oh it's nothing, no-one is interested".

In other news the Royal family after failing to convince anyone with the idea "They hadn't had anything to do with Savile since the 80s" are now bleating about how, "The Secret Service should have warned us" whilst the Secret Service is saying "Oh, we wouldn't know, it's a police matter" this despite, any number of journalists making it plain that. The Secret Service has run rings of rent boys and female hookers, of all ages, since the early 1960s and Savile's own relative has admitted he was used, as a teenager, by Savile to entrap both young boys and girls into "sex parties". In other words, the chances of the British Secret Service not knowing about Savile's activities are somewhere between none and sod all.

It would seem, the furious round of "buck passing" means, there is a lot more to come out .

reply to post by FireMoon


Indeed Firemoon, there has to be - a lot more to come out.

Just think - the Secret Service undoubtedly must have known all about Saville - and Saville's rubbing cheeks with the royals. Which begs the question, in knowing all about him (they must have), what the Secret Services were thinking in allowing Saville to get so close to the royals. Pass the buck as much as they like, they knew all about him. So what really is going on there? Is it really true that members of the royal family have been involved in all this? David Icke has said they are, as have others - I haven't gotten into the details of all that - but the question looms large when you see the pictures of them all together. I do have my eyes peeled though for attempts to curb the investigations, to cut them short before they get too close to someone TPTB aren't willing to sacrifice.


And here we have another example of the type of stategy that perverts like Savile use to get away with it - they pick on victims who, for whatever reason, are unlikely to be listened to..

Meanwhile an ex-Broadmoor patient has told how she was put into solitary confinement for six months after she told a nurse she had been molested by Savile.

The woman, who was sent to the hospital as a teenage killer, said the DJ touched her breast and tried to put his hand between her legs.

But when she complained she was accused of having "bizarre made-up thoughts" and locked away.

While the perv get given the keys to wander all over hospitals, including the keys to the nurses home at Leeds General Infirmary - what the hell were they doing?

www.telegraph.co.uk...

peace
J

Originally posted by NavyDoc

Originally posted by 3chainz
reply to post by gort51

 

I remember a high school teacher that use to rub his hands up 14 year old girls legs, while they stood next to him at his desk.....Of course back then us young guys would be saying...lucky bugger he can do that....Not, oh look at that old perve...etc...It was different times (better), people were free, New York was a hovel, Rubbish and pollution was every where.....Well at least we cleaned that up....

Um, yeah thats creepy not to mention an ethics violation. You sound like a pedophile yourself.

I have to agree, that is messed up. It was not "the good old times" when criminals got away with groping yong girls.

Yes it is creepy now - the point is that it was NOT considered creepy then - differnt times and values.

The staff and patients knew Jimmy was a pedophile, a psychiatric nurse goes so far to say he had a severe personality disorder.

reply to post by AmberLeaf


Okay, two MALE nurses coming forward with what they knew and saw. Now what we are going to do?

reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul


No, it was creepy back then too for the girls and boys it happened to, trust me on this one.

Originally posted by MountainLaurel
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul

 

No, it was creepy back then too for the girls and boys it happened to, trust me on this one.

Of course it was creepy for them - but is was not creepy for society at large.