In other words, after the deafening sadness of the 9/11 assaults against the Country, the Defendants each entering the conspiracy because of the confusion associated with the United States’ focus on Homeland Security to protect the safety of its citizens – and for personal gain at various times throughout the past decade as set forth in great detail below and as the receiver for the United States of America and State of New York shall forensically audit forthe benefit of Plaintiffs and all persons “on the grid” meant to receive the protection of the State (US and New York) the Defendants have actually and in fact engaged in the raping, pillaging and plundering of $43 Trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) as well as other personalty including clothing, automobiles, valuable jewelry, gold, silver, precious metals and all forms of valuable personal property known to man, so that the wealth of Plaintiffs and all citizens of the United States of America, and the wealth of the United States of America itself, were stolen as set forthabove and herein to the few groups of Americans who calculated and hatched the foregoing plan in directly copying the modus operandi associated with the historical manner in which theVikings raided, traded, explored and ultimately settled in wide areas of Europe, Asia and the North Atlantic islands from the late 8th to the mid-11th Century. Included among the lawless activities of the Defendants has been the breaking and entering into homes of American citizens and stripping such homes of jewelry, fixtures, appliances and anything of value, without courtorder or approval, and with full knowledge that no court or legislative system could stoppillaging and plundering done with such speed, such detailed intention and such Viking-like efficiency. This lawsuit is necessary to avoid the looming financial crisis that shall occur as aresult of the foregoing theft of $43 trillion-plus. Indeed, former TARP Inspector General Neil Banofsky has warned that another massive bailout will again be required if the money center banks and/or their principals are deemed “too big to jail."

Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by adjensen

---

A bunch of idiots starring your posts does not make you right.

Originally posted by CPYKOmega
For anyone doubting the authenticity of these claims here are the court papers.

This is a PDF of the Court documents pertaining to said lawsuit.

"Court Documents For The $43 Trillion Dollar Lawsuit – Implicates High Level Politicians And Banks"

Main Page:

planet.infowars.com...

Direct link to PDF:

www.scribd.com...

Originally posted by adjensen

Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by adjensen

---

A bunch of idiots starring your posts does not make you right.

... and your whining doesn't make me wrong.

Do you honestly believe that what I posted there is a rational legal argument? Frankly, I think a pretty clear case could be made that this is an intentional effort to smear legitimate grievances against banks and their predatory lending practices.

Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by longlostbrother

---

No. The only thing that is stupid and pointless is having a chance to AT LEAST point the light at the darkness but then some people cry like idiots "the lawyers ain't good enough." That must the STUPIDIST/LAMEST excuse for "lets do nothing" I have ever heard.

Its not like we have a choice at this point. We either take what we can get or just throw in the towel and accept another 10 trillion bailout. What the hell is wrong with people? Unbelievable!

Originally posted by EarthCitizen07

Originally posted by adjensen

Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by adjensen

---

A bunch of idiots starring your posts does not make you right.

... and your whining doesn't make me wrong.

Do you honestly believe that what I posted there is a rational legal argument? Frankly, I think a pretty clear case could be made that this is an intentional effort to smear legitimate grievances against banks and their predatory lending practices.

Fine you go ahead and prove it is "an intentional effort to smear legitimate grievances against the banks and their predatory practices." You seem so deadset it should be easy for you do so.

Originally posted by corsair00
reply to post by adjensen

---

Okay, go walk your dog, you are very naive and a bit stunned.

PEOPLE, this CNBC article was removed from the website THE SAME DAY it was posted. The CNBC's SENIOR VICE-PRESIDENT'S children were killed a few hours later. The nanny also had her throat and wrists cut. No evidence has proven that the woman killed the children. Somebody else could have come in and made it LOOK like the nanny killed them. Wake up. This story is huge. It is not frivolous or a fake lawsuit that will be thrown out right away. Have you seen the court documents for this? You can download all 912 PAGES of it here: archive.org...

Try and click on the original CNBC news article on this lawsuit and see what you find. The entire page and all of the comments, except for 2, have been deleted...

Originally posted by corsair00
reply to post by adjensen

---

Perhaps your answer to the world's problems is to commit suicide? Or just remain a stubborn curmudgeon - I'm not sure, I'm trying to figure you out...

Spire Law Group, LLP, California State Bar Registration Number 54393, is a national law firm with lawyers across the country