It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by Caltrops
Now I don't have to say "I'll vote for a 3rd party" .. I cast my ballot today, Gary Johnson all the way!
Originally posted by Just Chris
I said only the other day how RT is probably the most reliable media source in the world at the moment, and many shot me down saying it's just the same as the rest.
A) I think this thread backs up my point.
B) RT isn't owned by Rupert Murdoch
C) Star & Flag just for mentioning RT!
Originally posted by Antonio1
reply to post by Caltrops
Yeah, we can totally trust everything on Russian state owned T.V., they never have an agenda.
Also, I have to agree with a previous poster, it is highly inappropriate for a Russian state run "news" outlet to try and affect an American election.
Originally posted by Sinny
Does anyone know what happened to the Alyona Show?
RTs American News anchor? She was hot,smart and awesome - They've replaced her with a bird called Lauran Lyster I think - Not half as captivating
Originally posted by mahatche
Originally posted by Antonio1
reply to post by Caltrops
Yeah, we can totally trust everything on Russian state owned T.V., they never have an agenda.
Also, I have to agree with a previous poster, it is highly inappropriate for a Russian state run "news" outlet to try and affect an American election.
RT didn't host the event, they only aired it, as did cspan. All of these candidates existed and ran on these point far before RT agreed to air it.
I fully agree that RT, like any state sponsored news shouldn't be trusted, but this wasn't and RT event, they didn't pick the candidates and tell them what to say. They where merely one of the outlets allowed in to cover it, they aren't effecting the election in anyway other than helping to cover 3rd party candidates who have been treated as if they don't exist in the rest of the media.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
I wonder.... Doesn't it cross a line somewhere when a State owned organization of a foreign nation hosts an event like this? Russia TV isn't just a cute moniker...That's RUSSIA TV as much as Voice of America is American. Both absolutely insist upon independent editorial control and such...and Hey, I read them both for the aspects of news they offer.
I think a major network absolutely should have hosted this...but again, Russia TV is State Owned by the Russian Federation by way of the Ria Novosti Network in Moscow.
I never bother mentioning this because it rarely matters. Their news is just part of a whole and as right and wrong as anyone else.....but this seems pretty direct into the politics of the United States Presidential Race...for a Russian State Property to be getting?
RT has been accused of being “state-run” or dismissed as influenced by the Kremlin because it receives state funding.
To boot, from GlobalMediaWars.com:
“Its motto is “question more,” but it’s clear who supplies the answers to many of the questions on RT: the Kremlin.”
Glenn Beck on Fox News referred to RT as “state-run” and the “Pravda of today.”
And people have used this as a way to dismiss RT’s content, along with its mission of news with a Russian perspective. NPR “On the Media” host Bob Garfield’s remarks:
“Though they have the look and the feel of maybe BBC or CNN International, just 'cause it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck doesn't make it a duck.”
But let’s look at the mission and funding of the BBC.
According to its charter, its goals include representing the UK, its nations, regions and communities and bringing the UK to the world and the world to the UK.
While BBC World Service, which broadcasts to the world on radio, on TV and online, providing news and information in 32 languages, is funded by a government grant, it also recently received a significant sum of money from the US government according to reports.
And what about other international networks?
France 24’s mission is “to cover international current events from a French perspective and to convey French values throughout the world” and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the public-funded holding company Audiovisuel Exterieur de la France (AEF)
The German Deutsche Welle’s goal is to “promote understanding of Germany as an independent nation with its roots in European culture and as a liberal, democratic, constitutional state based on the rule of law.” It’s budget is made up of funds allocated by the federal government from German tax revenues, according to its website.
And here in the US, it’s the Corporation of Public Broadcasting that provides funds to public TV and radio stations. According to its website, “when Congress created CPB, it declared that developing public media is…“of appropriate and important concern” to the federal government. By law, 95 percent of CPB's appropriation from the federal government goes to support local television and radio stations, programming and improvements to the public broadcasting system.
Funding for PBS programs, for example, comes from a variety of sources, including the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and government agencies.
And outside the US, it’s the Broadcasting Board of Governors that transmits its message. The board encompasses all U.S. civilian international broadcasting: Voice of America(VOA), Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL),Radio Free Asia (RFA), Radio and TV Martí, and the Middle East Broadcasting Networks (MBN)—Radio Sawa and Alhurra Television.
It broadcasts in 59 languages to an estimated weekly audience of 165 million people via radio, TV, the Internet and other new media.
While its principles include being “consistent with the broad foreign policy objectives of the United States, and the capability to provide a surge capacity to support United States foreign policy objectives during crises abroad,” according to it’s website.
So call RT “state-funded” if you must, but if you want to “call a duck a duck,” as NPR’s host so eloquently put it, you might want to consider the pond we’re all swimming in.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Originally posted by mahatche
Originally posted by Antonio1
reply to post by Caltrops
Yeah, we can totally trust everything on Russian state owned T.V., they never have an agenda.
Also, I have to agree with a previous poster, it is highly inappropriate for a Russian state run "news" outlet to try and affect an American election.
RT didn't host the event, they only aired it, as did cspan. All of these candidates existed and ran on these point far before RT agreed to air it.
I fully agree that RT, like any state sponsored news shouldn't be trusted, but this wasn't and RT event, they didn't pick the candidates and tell them what to say. They where merely one of the outlets allowed in to cover it, they aren't effecting the election in anyway other than helping to cover 3rd party candidates who have been treated as if they don't exist in the rest of the media.
You're right of course and the OP misspoke by saying RT hosted the event. It was actually a Mexican Billionaire (among the richest people on Earth at last ranking) and someone shady enough, even MEXICO won't allow him to run this network of his openly in his own homeland.
How this is better..somehow...than a News organization owned and operated by the Government of the Russian Federation is beyond me.
In terms of RT and one post's mention of Russian PEOPLE being good. I agree. I've known some native Russians myself and a couple I was close with in trucking adopted a child from a Russian Orphanage. That gave the opportunity to see a lot of Russia, through their experiences, at the average person level. Great nation for it's people....
However........ MOSCOW is turning back more Soviet than Russian and Vladimir Putin was a Colonel of the SOVIET UNION, not the Russian Federation, as he built his career in the K.G.B.. How would we feel about a President who spent his whole life in the CIA?? That is Putin...and Putin owns RT. Lets all just keep perspective on things, eh?edit on 25-10-2012 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)