It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Read more: www.free-energy-info.co.uk...
Summary of the Invention
It has long been known that the source of the magnetism within a permanent magnet is a spinning electric current within ferromagnetic atoms of certain elements, persisting indefinitely in accord with well-defined quantum rules. This atomic current encircles every atom, thereby causing each atom to emit a magnetic field, as a miniature electromagnet.
This atomic current does not exist in magnets alone. It also exists in ordinary metallic iron, and in any element or metallic alloy which can be “magnetised”, that is, any material which exhibits ferromagnetism. All ferromagnetic atoms and “magnetic metals” contain such quantum atomic electromagnets.
In specific ferromagnetic materials, the orientation axis of each atomic electromagnet is flexible. The orientation of magnetic flux both internal and external to the material, pivots easily. Such materials are referred to as magnetically “soft”, due to this magnetic flexibility.
Permanent magnet materials are magnetically “hard”. The orientation axis of each is fixed in place within a rigid crystal structure. The total magnetic field produced by these atoms cannot easily move. This constraint aligns the field of ordinary magnets permanently, hence the name “permanent”...
Originally posted by yorkshirelad
A wind turbine is free energy. There is an initial capital cost for the turbine but there would be a cost associated with any device irrespective of its method of energy production.
So OP it has already been done.
NB this is in line with your insistent definition of free energy as opposed to the usual ignorance of physics and tapping of perpetual motion machines .......which nobody has ever built anywhere in the world. Even in China where they would not give a flying f.... who they upset in building one.
Originally posted by RebelSoldier
and for those who say that this violates the laws of physics, think about how a magnet actually works.
it only takes a very small amount of energy, in a very brief instant, to rearrange the atoms in a suitable metal. And you didn't even actually change how the atoms work, only now they are all oriented in the same direction so that the magnetic fields of the individual atoms can now flow through and each other giving the metal an over-all magnetic field.
And now, with no moving parts, no electrical charge, this innate piece of metal will do work and provide force for decades
How can you really say zero point energy is impossible, when you have a zero point energy device right in front of you, providing enough constant force to exceed the force of gravity, allowing it to steadily cling to the door of your own refrigerator?
Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by pheonix358
Come on people, is it too much to ask to learn even some rudimentary physics? Magnets are neither "perpeptual motion" or violate the laws of physics. The correlation between scientific illiteracy and faith in "over unity perpetual motion" is strong and no coincidence.
Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by pheonix358
Come on people, is it too much to ask to learn even some rudimentary physics? Magnets are neither "perpeptual motion" or violate the laws of physics. The correlation between scientific illiteracy and faith in "over unity perpetual motion" is strong and no coincidence.
Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by rolfharriss
And what purpose does it serve to have people who know nohing of physics and scientific method and having no inclination to learn making claims about breaking the laws of physics? It's the height of ignorance to not even get a basic grasp of physics yet make lofty claims about how physics and the scientific community is wrong. How exactly can an intelligent and informed discussion take place within this context?
Originally posted by RebelSoldier
and for those who say that this violates the laws of physics, think about how a magnet actually works.
it only takes a very small amount of energy, in a very brief instant, to rearrange the atoms in a suitable metal. And you didn't even actually change how the atoms work, only now they are all oriented in the same direction so that the magnetic fields of the individual atoms can now flow through and each other giving the metal an over-all magnetic field.
And now, with no moving parts, no electrical charge, this innate piece of metal will do work and provide force for decades
How can you really say zero point energy is impossible, when you have a zero point energy device right in front of you, providing enough constant force to exceed the force of gravity, allowing it to steadily cling to the door of your own refrigerator?
Originally posted by pheonix358
Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by pheonix358
Come on people, is it too much to ask to learn even some rudimentary physics? Magnets are neither "perpeptual motion" or violate the laws of physics. The correlation between scientific illiteracy and faith in "over unity perpetual motion" is strong and no coincidence.
Rudimentary physics? Physics is rewritten all the time as new discoveries and new theories are made. The major problem we have now is that we can no longer trust either science or scientists. Science can be bought! The tobacco industry bought science. Climate change proponents have bought science. Corporations have bought science. Our Governments will not tell the truth and act to hide some science discoveries.
You are putting science on a pedestal with shaky foundations. You can continue to trust science, I'll take it with a kilo of salt.
P