It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by flexy123
And.."keeping welfare to the esentials"...what else than fricking ESSENTIALS would that welfare money allow? Besides, if they really decide to buy drugs, a big screen TV or whatever from their welfare money, it's their problem.
Now, we have Obama Phones. 10 years from now, everybody will be scrambling for the next 'free' item.
Originally posted by Unrealised
How about a new system, a new way of doing things?
You're out of a job, on welfare? Fine. The Government will put you in a Government-run Apartment.
Hot water is timed. You have 4 members in your family? Press the button to start the shower. It will run for 5 minutes, then go cold. You can do this for each registered member of your family.
Electricity is metered. You have a certain amount of wall-socket-power each day. Your lights work between the hours of 6pm and 12am.
Your food is rationed. You catch a Government-bus or walk to Government-run 'Cafes' to receive your meal. You swipe your card, take your food into the eating area, and have a meal. This can be done for breakfast, lunch and dinner.
You need to travel? You have travel credits. Catch a Government-bus to your destination. Need to travel further? Apply for more credit, which will be deducted from your card.
Everything will be on your card. It has Photo I.D. You must input an 8 digit PIN. You must scan your fingerprint.
You must report to a job-search centre 3 days a week.
If you commit a crime and are caught, you are jailed for 1 year in a labour-prison.
Control is the only way to ensure Welfare is kept to the essentials.
Originally posted by Dynamike
reply to post by Hefficide
If you think that's bad you should listen to what I say. I am pro-evolution which means I dont want to pay a cent towards helping other unless they are close friends or family. I would let them all go without food and shelter.
Originally posted by Dynamike
But that is besides the point. One thing I noticed about the general reactions to proposals such as this, is the reaction you gave. But allow me to put this into perspective. If you chose to get money from someone and they said, "Ok but only if you follow these directions." What part about it is wrong? His proposal is not a form of control, it is the rules of an option.
Regardless of what you agree with, the problem is still going to be there. The issue we have is that we spend far far far too much money on government aid. 800 billion a year? Thats what we spent on the war in Afghanistan over the last 10 years combined.
Originally posted by Dynamike
I know first hand what it is like to be in a household where the government supplies everything and it sickens me. I went to a house this week where a mother of three boys who ranged in ages from 6 to 16 received "disability" checks of about $700 a month each for each child, all because they had ADD. She received government housing about $900 a month. Food EBT about $800 a month. Free cell phone with monthly minutes. Welfare check. College tuition. And guess what? She and her son got caught selling drugs from her house for more money.
The issue is that no government should have people who are dependent on them. No one should enable lazy drug dealers.
Q: Has the Obama administration started a program to use "taxpayer money" to give free cell phones to welfare recipients?
A: No. Low-income households have been eligible for discounted telephone service for more than a decade. But the program is funded by telecom companies, not by taxes, and the president has nothing to do with it.
SafeLink Wireless, the program mentioned in the e-mail, does indeed offer a cell phone, about one hour’s worth of calling time per month, and other wireless services like voice mail to eligible low-income households. Applicants have to apply and prove that they are either receiving certain types of government benefits, such as Medicaid, or have household incomes at or below 135 percent of the poverty line. Using 2009 poverty guidelines, that’s $14,620 for an individual and a little under $30,000 for a family of four, with slightly higher amounts for Alaska and Hawaii.
SafeLink is run by a subsidiary of América Móvil, the world’s fourth largest wireless company in terms of subscribers, but it is not paid for directly by the company. Nor is it paid for with "tax payer money," as the e-mail claims. Rather, it is funded through the Universal Service Fund, which is administered by the Universal Service Administrative Company, an independent, not-for-profit corporation set up by the Federal Communications Commission. The USF is sustained by contributions from telecommunications companies such as "long distance companies, local telephone companies, wireless telephone companies, paging companies, and payphone providers." The companies often charge customers to fund their contributions in the form of a universal service fee you might see on your monthly phone bill. The fund is then parceled out to companies, such as América Móvil, that create programs, such as SafeLink, to provide telecommunications service to rural areas and low-income households.
Originally posted by Dynamike
f you think that's bad you should listen to what I say. I am pro-evolution which means I dont want to pay a cent towards helping other unless they are close friends or family. I would let them all go without food and shelter.
Originally posted by KentuckyMan
reply to post by Unrealised
Apparently like many other's you do not know there is no such thing as food stamp's anymore.
They get there food allotment money on a E.B.T card.
They can only buy food with it...Not many drug dealer's trust a drug head's ya know..
There not gonna go here is ya a dime bag ..now go buy me a turkey and eggs and milks lol
Not to mention 99% of the case's where people see People use EBT cards on beer or smoke's...It has there own money on it..
Like in kentucky i know for a fact There food stamps child support and ssi or disability goes on the same card....
So Unless you can prove the people are not spending there own money technically ya grasping at straw's.
If you can see my point.