It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I do not rely on imagination when examining images but rely on years of previous visual knowledge and experience.
You still haven't explained what proof you would like me to provide…
…as the air pressure and oxygen level decreases any living inteligent species would tend to get smaller and smaller over time
As far as proof goes, are you expecting me to provide visual evidence of tiny beings that are less than 2mm in height?
Please give me a little time and I will accomodate your request. […sharing with us how these are not just rocks, and instead are unnatural?]
…there are rocks on the terrain and many other interesting objects that cannot be explained away as being natural.
Maybe after viewing the image below some members may be of a different opinion about what's really on the surface of Mars.
[Why are you always so sure about what you say?] In short ArMaP, academic qualifications and experience.
I will post an image with explanation later when I have more time.
Of course, I could be completely incorrect but from viewing and researching the images from Curiosity I do not think that is a possibility.
…to me many of these shapes appear as being very tiny structures with some of them displaying definite geometrical form.
I may possibly be completely incorrect about the tiny-sized beings and the very tiny structures on Mars but my research of the available visual evidence outweighs the negative aspect.
I will you to judge whether or not these unusual shapes and features are a figment of my imagination.
Doesn’t anyone with a pair of eyes acquire “years of visual knowledge and experience? What kind of credentials are those that qualify you to interpret these rocks as artificially constructed structures by tiny beings? Oh – and I, personally, think that yes indeed – you are relying on your imagination –and not much else.
Originally posted by arianna
If you can prove this to be incorrect I would welcome your response.
The majority of members posting on the thread are of the opinion that I am incorrect but that does not mean I have to agree with the collective concensus.
Many quite famous people in the past have proposed theories on particular subjects and have had to accept harsh criticism and ridicule from their peers when later on their theories have proved to be correct and all the naysayers have had to walk away with egg on their faces.