Proof - Obama is good for the economy!

page: 5
5
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 14 2012 @ 11:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by campanionator


Well I am glad my stock has gone up 800% under Obama

And my other one went up 500%


You are one of those evil guys paying 15% taxes...lol




posted on Oct, 14 2012 @ 11:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Xtrozero

Originally posted by campanionator


Well I am glad my stock has gone up 800% under Obama

And my other one went up 500%


You are one of those evil guys paying 15% taxes...lol


Dang right, I didn't lift a finger either!



posted on Oct, 14 2012 @ 11:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Xtrozero

Originally posted by campanionator

It is common sense.


It is not common sense... you can research many "common sense" cases of correlation that never had it.. Many of these "common sense" false correlations are studied in college too, this is done so that people do not pull correlations out their butts and say they are facts.

It is not something up for debate...enjoy your own version of reality.


edit on 14-10-2012 by Xtrozero because: (no reason given)


It's the truth -

If the economy were getting worse, America's companies would be doing worse, they are apart of
the same economic system, sir.



posted on Oct, 14 2012 @ 11:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by campanionator
It's the truth -

If the economy were getting worse, America's companies would be doing worse, they are apart of
the same economic system, sir.


Have you looked around America?

As I asked you in another post..

Since the dot coms failed horribly under Clinton he caused that right?



posted on Oct, 14 2012 @ 11:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by campanionator

Dang right, I didn't lift a finger either!


So why you voting for the man that wants to raise it much higher?

I don't find you very sincere (to say the least) in your answers.



posted on Oct, 14 2012 @ 11:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by Xtrozero

Originally posted by campanionator
It's the truth -

If the economy were getting worse, America's companies would be doing worse, they are apart of
the same economic system, sir.


Have you looked around America?

As I asked you in another post..

Since the dot coms failed horribly under Clinton he caused that right?


I have looked around America, it have traveled every summer for the last 4 years and I see the places
I visit get better with each passing year. Even some places in rural Texas and New Mexico look better...

I suppose Clinton might have some responsibility, but I think to compare the Dot Com bubble and
what happened in 2008 is not being sincere as you put it. Europe is STILL trying to stem the bleeding
from the debacle, TOMORROW people will be working to resolve it all these years later.

I know you guys are playing politics, but I hope your perspective is not due to your inability
to think critically.



posted on Oct, 14 2012 @ 11:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by Xtrozero

Originally posted by campanionator

Dang right, I didn't lift a finger either!


So why you voting for the man that wants to raise it much higher?

I don't find you very sincere (to say the least) in your answers.


How much higher is that???

I don't find you serious



posted on Oct, 15 2012 @ 12:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by campanionator
How much higher is that???

I don't find you serious


He wants to raise it to 20%...You being so critical of Romney will I find any past posts from you criticizing Romney for only paying 15% too? Well that and 30% charities...



posted on Oct, 15 2012 @ 12:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by Xtrozero

Originally posted by campanionator
How much higher is that???

I don't find you serious


He wants to raise it to 20%...You being so critical of Romney will I find any past posts from you criticizing Romney for only paying 15% too? Well that and 30% charities...


I criticize Romney for talking down on people who work, while he pays less effective tax rate for
doing nothing.

I have no problem with 20%



posted on Oct, 15 2012 @ 05:09 PM
link   
reply to post by campanionator
 


Guess again
m.washingtonexaminer.com/taxes-charity-cost-romney-57.9-percent-of-income/article/2510746#.UHwQ8sXA-4d





top topics
 
5
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join