free energy technology exists..

reply to post by Miccey


For the last time: none of the examples you gave are scientific laws or examples of breaking scientific laws. They are simply things you have just made up yourself. That's not how discussions work, you don't just make things up then get all flustered when people point this out to you.

this is one of the most important threads for Humanity right now...


get the Truth out that this technology exists...

free Humanity and save this planet from being raped, did you know this world is a living being?

also we must abolish the federal reserve/for-profit banking system..

shut down the brainwashing/mind control mainstream media...

replace with truth and love and solutions...

thank you

Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by Miccey

 

For the last time: none of the examples you gave are scientific laws or examples of breaking scientific laws. They are simply things you have just made up yourself. That's not how discussions work, you don't just make things up then get all flustered when people point this out to you.

edit on 6-10-2012 by john_bmth because: (no reason given)

You keep telling me that but you give no expl to WHY?
So as a human being theres nothing in the "laws", that
prevents me from defying gravity...Yet i do that, with a
plane. As in manipulating my surounding....
And im not "flustrated"...Im amuzed....You can
bang your head as much as you want, ill keep beleving
in the possibility. And one day YOU will eat your hat in
agony....

reply to post by Miccey

So as a human being theres nothing in the "laws", that
prevents me from defying gravity...Yet i do that, with a
plane.

Laws are mathematical equations. You are not breaking any laws by flying in a plane.

Heres my thoughts about the LAWS:

1: I shouldnt be able to speak to a person cross the world.
Yet i do with my phone
2: I shouldnt be able to fly.
Yet i do with a Plane.
3: I shouldnt be able to go faster than i can possibly run..
Yet i can go about 90+mph in a fast car
4: I shouldnt be able throw a rock 2km
Yet i can fire a Turret and the shell goes EVEN further...

1. Not a law, but a weak understanding of the environment around you.
2. Same thing.
3. Same thing.
4. ...you get the picture.

Basically you are stating that because humans were at the intelligence level at cavemen in one period of history, it should have remained that way for eternity, and somehow we broke the "rules" which you believe or they believed governed over us.

Hey b nice to see you joining the headbangers ball...

And no i dont belive it to be rules thats governing..
Just theoretical principles. And I DO manipulate the
"rules" by using a plane to fly.

The mathematical equation you say, state that
according to my wieght, i shouldnt be able to fly.
Or is this wrong...?

Can you fly? WITHOUT a plane. Or some other
contraption. Didnt think so....

reply to post by Miccey


Flying in an aeroplane is NOT breaking the laws of physics. Science does not care what you think or believe scientific laws are, your definition of the term is completely wrong. Read up on scientific laws before accusing others of misunderstanding things.

The plane is flying and doing so quite comfortably within the laws of physics. You being inside that plane does not violate the laws of physics. You (quite obviously) are not physically creating the lift and thrust yourself, that is coming from the wings and engines of the plane, again all within the laws of physics. The same goes for every other example you have given.

I watched it. I think he gives a good speech, tells a good story. I find it odd that over 3 years have passed and they still have nothing to show for their efforts. I find it odd that he turns down 2 billion plus dollars but cannot even raise 5.7 million according to his website.

I'll look into this more tomorrow and formulate more opinions.

reply to post by john_bmth


NOW we´r getting somewere...
So, we can agree i NEED the plane to be able to fly...
Without it i cant.

Soooo, by tweaking my environment i can FLY...Wohoo

And their not LAWS...They are theoretical principals depending on yada yada...







Having a blast here

Just watched the video in the op.
So presumably by now steven greer does not
pay any electricity bills.
Funny how people harp on free energy without
knowing an iota of physics that goes into one of these free energy devices.

reply to post by Angelic Resurrection


Well, maybe they dont, maybe they do?!?
What if they do??

What if theyr messing whith ya all, ya know like
a smokescreen...And secretly working on some
other contraption, luaghing behind your collective
arses....I kinow tis farfetched...But, who knows....


Di di di di di di daaaa

Originally posted by Miccey
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection

 

Well, maybe they dont, maybe they do?!?
What if they do??

What if theyr messing whith ya all, ya know like
a smokescreen...And secretly working on some
other contraption, luaghing behind your collective
arses....I kinow tis farfetched...But, who knows....


Di di di di di di daaaa

lol

i know the tech exists, i have seen it....you can find it on the internet

reply to post by Miccey


aloch. wtf are you on about mate

Originally posted by cornucopia

Originally posted by Miccey
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection

 

Well, maybe they dont, maybe they do?!?
What if they do??

What if theyr messing whith ya all, ya know like
a smokescreen...And secretly working on some
other contraption, luaghing behind your collective
arses....I kinow tis farfetched...But, who knows....


Di di di di di di daaaa

lol

i know the tech exists, i have seen it....you can find it on the internet

No no no...Those gadgets are the smokescreen...
They keep the goodies behind the counter...

thank you for keeping this thread alive, thank you

we shall have free energy...soon

I retract my statements on tesla with free energy . Not really sure how I came to the conclusion that he did . He only had the means to transmit power without wires . He still needed to turn that generator and that needs power.
Granted the work he did with Niagara falls and the no need of cooper wires would of only made it dam near free energy to the consumer

Originally posted by freedomSlave
I retract my statements on tesla with free energy . Not really sure how I came to the conclusion that he did . He only had the means to transmit power without wires . He still needed to turn that generator and that needs power.
Granted the work he did with Niagara falls and the no need of cooper wires would of only made it dam near free energy to the consumer

And we cant have that can we...
We HAVE to have money and Supply and Demand...

reply to post by Miccey


nah I am sure they would of found a way to over charge that as well

money is just paper with ink on it, only has value if you believe it does


they can and do print money all day...lol

epic scam...

watch it fall

A lot of the free energy devices are over unity and some are too exotic
such as using radioactive decay alpha and beta decay to produce electricity.
I think Tesla commended Madam Curie thinking Radium would create free energy.
That is too dangerous for many reasons. Air and other material are like on demand
radioactive such that alpha and beta charges become available. Air being sparked
with a Tesla coil. Why waste a lighting bolt. Electricity from air is free.
How much charge did David Blaine waste to the air instead of collecting the
electricity. So the question is what type of generator do you have with mere charges.
I think its called a current generator and can blow up in a no load condition.
I recall a teacher noting the device and a student asked what a current generator
was, I don't think the teacher knew and just taught the circuit math. He would have
to back to Dr Moray who even forgot what he accomplished and now we know
why it worked and blew up.

The Papp Engine might be true free energy.

we all know we are not alone in this universe and we all know free energy technology exists, we just need to rememeber..to wake up

good times ahead


love for the win