It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by XPLodER
It's simply a demonstration.
What's next?
An Iranian version of China's great internet Google firewall?
Meet the new Boss.
Worse than the present boss!
edit on 23-9-2012 by SLAYER69 because: (no reason given)
The citizens will have bigger concerns if Israel gets its wish.
Like staying alive.
You do realize these are Nuclear Targets being discussed?
Originally posted by Humanity4Ever
I don't think Israel should launch an unprovoked strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, but under no circumstances would Iranian civilians be deliberately targeted in a coordinated IDF mission.
Originally posted by Tw0Sides
You do realize these are Nuclear Targets being discussed?
Originally posted by Humanity4Ever
I don't think Israel should launch an unprovoked strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, but under no circumstances would Iranian civilians be deliberately targeted in a coordinated IDF mission.
Care to take a Scenic Vacation to Fukushima, Rates are unseasonally low currently.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
POST REMOVED BY STAFF
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by ancientthunder
I don't think it is supposed to "help the situation" - it is supposed to point out the difference betwen having free speech and not having it.
Originally posted by Soshh
The 'counter cyber-warfare' argument is pretty weak. Being cut off from the World Wide Web will not insulate Iran from specially designed malware. It could insulate the rest of us from nasty bugs on Iranian systems though - thanks. The idea is to increase the state's control over what information the Iranian public has access to via their computer. That's it.
Originally posted by Soshh
The 'counter cyber-warfare' argument is pretty weak. Being cut off from the World Wide Web will not insulate Iran from specially designed malware. It could insulate the rest of us from nasty bugs on Iranian systems though - thanks. The idea is to increase the state's control over what information the Iranian public has access to via their computer. That's it.
Originally posted by XPLodER
in response to what?
if its about control of the ideas and thoughts of a population, why now?
you cant discount the situation they are in,
or do you have a reason to do so?
Originally posted by omnihue
Originally posted by Soshh
The 'counter cyber-warfare' argument is pretty weak. Being cut off from the World Wide Web will not insulate Iran from specially designed malware. It could insulate the rest of us from nasty bugs on Iranian systems though - thanks. The idea is to increase the state's control over what information the Iranian public has access to via their computer. That's it.
If I am to believe this then I have no choice but to believe the Iranian's have no concerns about any possible nuclear strikes on their land but would rather focus on the gossip market of their people over who is googling what.
Originally posted by Soshh
Originally posted by omnihue
Originally posted by Soshh
The 'counter cyber-warfare' argument is pretty weak. Being cut off from the World Wide Web will not insulate Iran from specially designed malware. It could insulate the rest of us from nasty bugs on Iranian systems though - thanks. The idea is to increase the state's control over what information the Iranian public has access to via their computer. That's it.
If I am to believe this then I have no choice but to believe the Iranian's have no concerns about any possible nuclear strikes on their land but would rather focus on the gossip market of their people over who is googling what.
Ah so they blocked Google to prevent nuclear strikes. It all makes sense now thanks for that mate you're bloody clever you are.