It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Fact is, we believe - as ANY reasonable person should believe - that words have no relationship to actions. Insulting someone else in some way should never lead to a violent assault against your person
Our religious sensibilities - derived from Christianity and Judaism - teaches one to exercise patience and self control in such situations. Islam, however, DOES NOT.
.
However, this video was online for a year.
It was engineered by the Islamists to happen this way; and now the Islamists - amazingly with Obamas tacit acquiescence
(Hillary Clinton began her speech FIRST with a criticism of the creators of the video, and only then defending their right to do so; a complete reversal of priority)
Originally posted by dontreally
reply to post by trysts
If that's gonna be your attitude, drink drayno
I don't agree with everything she says - but this video in particular, minus the melodrama and theatrics, makes an undeniably important point. Islamism is a implacable issue that needs to be seriously addressed.
In any case, the mature person doesn't assume beforehand; s/he watches and then assesses what's said.
I disagree. Stand in front of ANY grown man, call his wife a slut and tell me that you didn't expect to get your teeth knocked in.
Islam does not teach anything more "radical" than what can be read in the Old Testament. Self-control related to violence is more of a social/cultural issue more than religion
"Anyone can see that what was said about Islam was crude.".
Anyway, this is a bad situation and it goes much deeper than this video, Obama and our right to free speech. This is about years of US manipulation in the region and we are reaping what we sow after all this time.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
Islam does not teach anything more "radical" than what can be read in the Old Testament.
Originally posted by dontreally
reply to post by trysts
oops! double postedit on 15-9-2012 by trysts because: (no reason given)edit on 15-9-2012 by trysts because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by FlyersFan
- Christianity doesn't make Old Testament the rule of the land.
- Christianity has secular laws that keep it in check.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
Islam does not teach anything more "radical" than what can be read in the Old Testament.
- What is in the Old Testament is definately 'radical'.
- Christianity doesn't make Old Testament the rule of the land.
- Christianity has secular laws that keep it in check.
- Most Christians don't even follow the 10 commandments let alone anything else 'biblical'.
- Most muslims follow the Qu'ran rules as best they understand them.
- Islam wants Islamic religious rule of law .. which is totally different.
- Therefore ... Islam is much more of a radical threat than Christianity.
Originally posted by Lysergic
From this one could gather, most "Christians" are in fact not Christians, it's just a box they check.
Oh Mrs Bachman, at least your not Sarah Palin... Right?
I'm curious ... why does she call the attack on the embassy a "terrorist attack"?
Originally posted by Ryanssuperman
I'm curious ... why does she call the attack on the embassy a "terrorist attack"?