It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spoor
Only conspiracy theorists claim anyone said that they lost $2.3 trillion...edit on 9-9-2012 by spoor because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by spoor
Originally posted by Pr0t0
Rumsfeld made the announcement the day before 9/11
No one said he didnt, but he never said the money was missing, and it was announced well before that as well.
Originally posted by spoor
Wrong, it was never reported missing, and the announcement was a year before 9/11
Why do people continue to post such nonsense?
Originally posted by elitegamer23
one thing i just never understood about 9-11-01 is why the pentagon, and not the white house.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
flight 93 was headed fo the white house
the pilots were very raw and needed targets they could see easily and recognize and were symbols of american culture and power
like the pentagon
Originally posted by Pr0t0
we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions. We cannot share information from floor to floor in this building because it's stored on dozens of technological systems that are inaccessible or incompatible."
Originally posted by elitegamer23
one thing i just never understood about 9-11-01 is why the pentagon, and not the white house.
with all the thought , time, and money put into the attacks of 9-11, why would they have hit the pentagon when the whitehouse just seems like an easier, and more appealing target .
it would have been the easiest building to find in washington dc, and maybe the biggest target to hit in all of america if you want to make a statement.
see why it would have been the easiest to find in an airplane?
edit on 8-9-2012 by elitegamer23 because: (no reason given)
OBL wanted to hit the White House, the others thought it would be too difficult.
Originally posted by spoor
Originally posted by Pr0t0
we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions. We cannot share information from floor to floor in this building because it's stored on dozens of technological systems that are inaccessible or incompatible."
No where does it mention that any money was missing.... and by Feb 2002 more than 2/3rd of that had been reconciled.
There was no secret that money could not be properly accounted for, it was published many times before 9/11. But conspiracy theorists ignore all those announcements as they destroy their silly conspiracy theories!
www.911myths.com...edit on 9-9-2012 by spoor because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by apushforenlightment
I think George Bush did not want to have to redeciorate again.
No you are wrong it was just a few days before.... How did a airplane penetrate 4 6ft reinforced concrete walls?
The extensive use of reinforced concrete and non-reinforced masonry was one concession. Certainly the threat of any kind of terrorist attack on the building was far from the thoughts of the original designers. As a result, the Pentagon was constructed with a thin limestone facade over a brick infill between reinforced concrete floors, structurally supported by a reinforced concrete beam and column frame. Enough to protect from the elements but not from the potential forces of significant blast events.
This argument is based on a misunderstanding of the Pentagon's design. In fact, the light wells between the C- and D-ring and D- and E-ring are only three stories deep. The first and second stories span the distance between the Pentagon's facade and the punctured C-ring wall, which faces a ground-level courtyard. There are no masonry walls in this space, only load-bearing columns. Thus it would be possible for an aircraft part that breached the facade to travel through this area on the ground floor, miss the columns, and puncture the C-ring wall without having encountering anything more than unsubstantial gypsum walls and furniture in-between.
Flight 93 was not headed to the whitehouse. 93 impacted exactly where it was supposed to.
Originally posted by thedman
This argument is based on a misunderstanding of the Pentagon's design. In fact, the light wells between the C- and D-ring and D- and E-ring are only three stories deep. The first and second stories span the distance between the Pentagon's facade and the punctured C-ring wall, which faces a ground-level courtyard. There are no masonry walls in this space, only load-bearing columns. Thus it would be possible for an aircraft part that breached the facade to travel through this area on the ground floor, miss the columns, and puncture the C-ring wall without having encountering anything more than unsubstantial gypsum walls and furniture in-between.
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by SatoriTheory
Flight 93 was not headed to the whitehouse. 93 impacted exactly where it was supposed to.
Why if supposed to impact in Shanksville were the hijackers dialing in the VOR radio beacon at Regan National
airport......?
Originally posted by Shamatt
and two 6 tone engines to the point that nothing was left of them?
Not even a broken pane of glass?
Originally posted by spoor
then they worked as designed - each window unit weighed 1,600lbs....
www.masonrymagazine.com...
Originally posted by Shamatt
An engine which was totally destroyed to the point there was nothing left of it on site
Originally posted by spoor
Originally posted by Shamatt
An engine which was totally destroyed to the point there was nothing left of it on site
So you still have not bothered to look at the pictures of the engines recovered at the Pentagon..
This is typical of people who believe a conspiracy theory about 9/11, they steadfastly refuse to look at any evidence that will destroy their silly conspiracy theory!