reply to post by ErgoTheConclusion
This hyper concern with physical beauty is an objectification of body. What the feminists want - a pipe dream, a fantasy - is to have their cake and
eat it too. They want the latitude to present themselves in any way they desire, but also, to deny basic facts of biology, to deny that men,
independent of their own volition, will become more aroused when women present themselves more scantily dressed.
This tabula rasa nonsense which hypothesizes a mans reaction to a woman's beauty and charm to be nothing more than 'environmental conditioning' is
absurd, unscientific ideologically motivated trite. They want to erase that reality in order to arrogate further powers for female kind, as if their
subconscious emotional sway over a man's psychology weren't enough; because anything less then complete unqualified equality - because to be
different means to be inferior, apparently - is somehow immoral.
If patriarchal society means acknowledgement of differences, and matriarchal society means abnegation of differences, than I think if we want to live
in a just world, we should prefer a patriarchal society.
Womankind has been favored in a way that man isn't. A man cannot exert subconscious, subtle influence over a woman's decision making and behavior as a
woman can over a man. Feminists choose not to take note of this. Somehow, it's irrelevant. But in any case, since it is acknowledged the world over,
from ancient times to now, it's unnatural to treat women in every situation the same as men; a simple example being the desire for equality in public
dress: just as men are allowed to walk around topless, feminists argue they should be granted the same privileges. Ignored is the biological effect a
topless man has on women verses the effect a topless woman has on men. This alone determines the morality. The circumstance - a mans biology and his
response - puts him at the mercy of his sex drive once he sees a topless woman. Conversely, a woman can see a topless man and not sexualize it. The
issue being: how the sex in question responds to the sight of toplessness. A woman's biology allows her the wiggle room to not be afflicted with
unwanted sexual thoughts, whereas a man, whether a married one who values monogamy with his wife, and thus freedom from oppressive thoughts, or a
youth, who shouldn't be inured to such sights at such a young and suggestible age, has much less freedom.
Laws are designed to promote freedom, no??? Well here, feminists want to take what little freedom law gives men from their sultry powers over us. It
seems to me feminism is motivated at root against biology, against God; at it's root, it's a rebellion against nature - which is ironic since they use
nature in their platform. In any case those who desire to live free, which means, to live from EXTERNAL INFLUENCE i.e. the pangs of unqualified
instinct, which affects men far more than women, for those who value the freedom to will what they please, who value the freedom to live as they
please, this wanton abuse of scientific fact by feminists impinges on THEIR freedom to think and feel free from external influences.
Hence, feminism is intimately linked with moral relativism, with nihilism, with naturism; in short, with ancient paganism. What the Judeo-Christian
tradition sought to emancipate mankind from - from subservience to the passions - feminists hope to bring us back into slavery to. But who does it
benefit?? It benefits THEM! They will have all the emotional power over us in addition to political powers which support them.
The Judeo-Christian tradition balances it out. It acknowledges, and indeed, it cannot outright erase, the influence a woman has over a man; nature has
decreed that it be so, that men, like the Absolute, seek expression, just as a woman takes the indeterminate seed of a man and gives it expression in
her womb as a child.
This is natural law. A womans power is essentially esoteric, private, and covert. To give her exoteric, public and overt powers, doesn't change the
situation. It just affords her the power to rule over men inside and out.
That's the fact of the matter. Thus Patriarchal law is a balance of natures - and a woman's - power over man.
edit on 9-9-2012 by dontreally
because: (no reason given)
