It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Employees at the venerable Gallup polling firm suggested they felt threatened by Obama campaign adviser David Axelrod when he questioned the methodology of a mid-April poll showing Mitt Romney leading the president – according to internal emails published Thursday. ...
According to the email chain titled “Axelrod vs. Gallup,” the White House in addition asked that a Gallup staffer “come over and explain our methodology,” which was apparently perceived as a subtle threat. A Gallup official said in an email he thought Axelrod’s pressure “sounds a little like a Godfather situation. ..
However, when Gallup declined to change its polling methodology, the Obama administration’s Justice Department revived a 2009 whistle-blower lawsuit against the firm by joining the suit, a senior Gallup official alleges.
Internal emails between senior officials at The Gallup Organization, obtained by The Daily Caller, show senior Obama campaign adviser David Axelrod attempting to subtly intimidate the respected polling firm when its numbers were unfavorable to the president.
After Gallup declined to change its polling methodology, Obama’s Department of Justice hit it with an unrelated lawsuit that appears damning on its face.
Originally posted by seeker1963
Chicago, baseball bat politics as usual!
Lindley was a field organizer in Council Bluffs, Iowa, for then-Sen. Obama’s 2008 run for president before joining Gallup, a fact omitted from the DOJ’s legal filings and from most press accounts.
“Imagine Axel[rod] with Brando’s voice: ‘I’d like you to come over and explain your methodology…You got a nice poll there … would be a shame if anything happened to it… .’”
The lawsuit isn't anything new.
Gallup, the source continued, did not hear from the Justice Department again for approximately one-and-a-half years.
“We did not have a substantive discussion about what they had subpoenaed until Fall of 2011,” the Gallup official told TheDC. “And the meeting came at our request, a request that had been outstanding from the time we were served [with the subpoenas]."
Originally posted by Zarniwoop
I think probably the DOJ is acting on it's own without influence from the O-admin.
Do you honestly believe that anybody in this Administration breaks wind without checking with the White House first?
Originally posted by Zarniwoop
Biden appears to do so quite often.
US— A former director of the Gallup Organisation has filed a lawsuit against the firm, alleging that it defrauded the US government and sacked him when he threatened to report the matter to the Justice Department.
Michael Lindley, who served as director of client services at Gallup between 2008 and 2009, alleges that the firm submitted “exaggerated cost estimates” for research projects carried out on behalf of a number of government agencies while directing him to enter lower, more accurate figures into the firm’s internal management system.
What a bunch of cry babies...explain you methodology!! Kinda important if you want a poll to be taken seriously!
...and while you are at it...explain why you over-charged the Gov. 10 Million (Taxpayer dollars)...
Originally posted by Zarniwoop
I think probably the DOJ is acting on it's own without influence from the O-admin.
Originally posted by Zarniwoop
Why wait so long to join a lawsuit that is primarily a wrongful termination suit?
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Zarniwoop
Why wait so long to join a lawsuit that is primarily a wrongful termination suit?
Exactly.
Wrongful termination?
COUNT IV: Wrongful Termination in Violation of Public Policy
...
d. That, by reason of Defendant’s wrongful discharge of Plaintiff in violation of public
policy, judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff Lindley and against Defendant;
e. That Plaintiff Lindley be awarded double his back-pay losses under the Employee
Protection Provision of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h), plus front pay, interest, costs,
and attorneys’ fees, and special damages for emotional distress and harm to his reputation;
f. That Plaintiff Lindley be re-instated to his former position at Gallup, with all
applicable raises;
g. That Plaintiff Lindley be awarded compensatory damages, in an amount to be
proven at trial, based on Defendant’s wrongful discharge of Plaintiff in violation of public
policy;
Tax payer dollars stolen...employee fired for speaking up about it...EXACTLY who the whistleblower law was designed to protect.