What The Hell Is This?

page: 3
11
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 6 2012 @ 04:33 PM
link   
i was well aware of those videos when they first came out at first when i clicked on one day i saw a reference in the site to david icke being the site owner that was under going maintenance alarm bells started going off in my head this blokes a fraud how is he still breathing when slagging off the queen of the dammed or george bush etc etc .
me thinks a lot of people are involved with this as hefficide says conspiracy sells and sells well
were all doomed now read the book buy the dvd




posted on Sep, 6 2012 @ 05:58 PM
link   
reply to post by freemarketsocialist
 


They look familiar but have noticebly different features upon closer inspection. I don't buy the guy's video that they're actors in different roles taking part in fictitious events. Nothing to see here, move on.



posted on Sep, 6 2012 @ 06:01 PM
link   
reply to post by Char-Lee
 


The teeth are different especially the ones next to the frontteeth, and Lisa Fithian´s eyes are way further apart. They look alike and that´s the only connection imo.

I do believe in the existence of all sorts of media fakery though, I just don´t think this is the same woman.
edit on 6-9-2012 by BuckWilder because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2012 @ 06:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by BuckWilder
reply to post by Char-Lee
 


The teeth are different especially the ones next to the frontteeth, and Lisa Fithian´s eyes are way further apart. They look alike and that´s the only connection imo.

I do believe in the existence of all sorts of media fakery though, I just don´t think this is the same woman.
edit on 6-9-2012 by BuckWilder because: (no reason given)


The teeth can be changed slightly by a covering but not the size. the eyes look further apart by makeup changes.

Many people have decided based on where the idea came from. I think that is a mistake. I don't even know who they are really but I would not rule out them being the same persons. Seems I am alone in my thinking but I am almost always right.



posted on Sep, 6 2012 @ 06:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Char-Lee
 





I am almost always right.



Me too so that´s quite the paradox.

edit on 6-9-2012 by BuckWilder because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2012 @ 07:32 PM
link   
reply to post by freemarketsocialist
 


Dallas Goldbug, the maker of that youtube video, is such a boob. He goes way overboard to the point of absurdity and way beyond that and back. Maybe some of his claims could have been true, but so much is just pure and absolute retarded paranoid fake hogwash, why even bother watching his stuff.



posted on Sep, 6 2012 @ 08:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by sinza
reply to post by freemarketsocialist
 


Dallas Goldbug, the maker of that youtube video, is such a boob. He goes way overboard to the point of absurdity and way beyond that and back. Maybe some of his claims could have been true, but so much is just pure and absolute retarded paranoid fake hogwash, why even bother watching his stuff.
the strange thing is when he first appeared on the scene his stuff was good then within 2 weeks it all turned to crap it was like somebody got to him it is totally a joke now but maybe that is the point .i wonder where his ip address leads now there are a few going into army instilations rense etc



posted on Sep, 6 2012 @ 10:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by Maroboduus

Originally posted by OutonaLimb
See Here regarding the
completely faked and staged Giffords shooting, and other numerous examples
of just how faked it all really is!

That's one of the dumbest things i've ever read.
So, the evidence that the Gifford shooting was staged, as far as i can tell from that link, is that...the young girl who was shot was born on 9/11??? And her church is named after St. Odelia??? Oh wait, also one of the pictures of one of the victims makes his eyes look funny! Well, that proves it!!!
Sweet lord almighty, give me a break....there's grasping at straws, and then there's plain old delusion....


It is difficult sometimes to suffer fools gladly! Is that all you got from the many, many
pages of intelligent and ultimately indisputable collective evidence proffered?
The case is proven that not only was the whole giffords event completely staged,
but that Loughner himself was/is nothing but a computer generated virtual patsy/scapegoat
creation/character.
And yes, the child 'victim's' birthdate was thrown into the mix to reinforce the false reality
of another of their transparent (to those who look) fakery extravaganzas.

Do you know who was ass-ass-inated on 09-11-1901?
Do you know what came to life on 09-11-1941?

Sure you don't! But then again... maybe i'm the fool.

I suffer less, these days, by design... and necessity.
edit on 6-9-2012 by OutonaLimb because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2012 @ 10:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by Char-Lee

Originally posted by BuckWilder
reply to post by Char-Lee
 


The teeth are different especially the ones next to the frontteeth, and Lisa Fithian´s eyes are way further apart. They look alike and that´s the only connection imo.

I do believe in the existence of all sorts of media fakery though, I just don´t think this is the same woman.
edit on 6-9-2012 by BuckWilder because: (no reason given)


The teeth can be changed slightly by a covering but not the size. the eyes look further apart by makeup changes.

Many people have decided based on where the idea came from. I think that is a mistake. I don't even know who they are really but I would not rule out them being the same persons. Seems I am alone in my thinking but I am almost always right.


No. You are not alone.



posted on Sep, 6 2012 @ 10:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by BuckWilder
Judy Clarke





Lisa Fithian




Medea Benjamin



These are not the same women for multiple reasons.


Who This?


And Who This?


See what Fake-Up (face make-up) can do?

Believe it, if you like.



posted on Sep, 6 2012 @ 10:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Char-Lee
 



Judy Clarke's front left tooth - across and up.


Lisa Fithian's front left tooth - across and up.


Madea Benjamin's front left tooth - across and up.

The same person is portraying all three characters - Lisa Fithian.

Zoom in to spot the obvious Fake-Up (face make-up) on 'judy clarke' and 'madea benjamin'.

Well done Char-lee. Stick to your guns son.
You do know best.



posted on Sep, 6 2012 @ 11:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by geobro
i was well aware of those videos when they first came out at first when i clicked on one day i saw a reference in the site to david icke being the site owner that was under going maintenance alarm bells started going off in my head this blokes a fraud how is he still breathing when slagging off the queen of the dammed or george bush etc etc .
me thinks a lot of people are involved with this as hefficide says conspiracy sells and sells well
were all doomed now read the book buy the dvd


Agreed (kinda) geobro. But as i believe you know, there is so much purposefulconfusion about,
all evidence must be taken on it's own merits, and I believe what dgb presents here is not without merit.

Certainly all the cited stories associated with the 'actress' seem to be fake.

Btw: I assume you still stand by your asssertions that the 9/11 footage was shown hours
before it 'happened', to you and your neck of the woods. I still believe you.

You might find this thread, and the latest (and very appealing) theory presented, interesting.

Latest thinking starts here:
www.cluesforum.info...

Very interesting, no?
edit on 6-9-2012 by OutonaLimb because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 7 2012 @ 07:03 AM
link   
reply to post by OutonaLimb
 


Are you for real? Those front teeth you are pointing out don't even look the same, not to mention the very different fangs you seem to ignore completely.

The Bin Laden/Obama thing is beyond ridiculous. I mean, how is anyone supposed to take that seriously?




Btw: I assume you still stand by your asssertions that the 9/11 footage was shown hours before it 'happened', to you and your neck of the woods. I still believe you.


Is there a link to this story?

I have to say that I believe, or rather have established that most if not all 911 footage was faked.
edit on 7-9-2012 by BuckWilder because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 7 2012 @ 07:58 AM
link   
For those, who don't know this image:
It's an example of the possibilities of makeup. without any latex components or similar stuff.

edit on 7.9.2012 by grobi77 because: image too big...



posted on Sep, 7 2012 @ 01:34 PM
link   
reply to post by OutonaLimb
 


yip 100% stand by what i say on the time got a lot of people to back me up on it 2 it was only when i watched the green screen expo on wellaware1 that i got the answer to how that was on the tv over here when it was not even going down in america
icke makes that claim in one of his books that a lot of people on tv look similar you would think that they were cloning people ?



posted on Sep, 7 2012 @ 01:45 PM
link   
reply to post by OutonaLimb
 


ps was watchind a national geographic thing on sky uk last night the woman who was not there about 9-11 some spanish bird using a english alias who claimed to have lost her hubby & been rescued by firemen on 9-11 then spent time in hospital had everyone fooled for years then interview went to her spanish mates & showed a clip of her in spain on that day her pal said that they heard about attack at breakfast time ? and i have spoken to people who were abroad and say the same so its not just the uk that aired it



posted on Sep, 7 2012 @ 02:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by grobi77
For those, who don't know this image:
It's an example of the possibilities of makeup. without any latex components or similar stuff.

edit on 7.9.2012 by grobi77 because: image too big...


There are some things you can't fake with makeup. One person has cheek dimples the other has a dimple on their chin. I looked closely for eye makeup needed to change the appearance of the with of the eyes, not there! I know a thing or two about make up. and these are things that would have to be done with photo shop.

They are different people.



posted on Sep, 7 2012 @ 02:17 PM
link   
reply to post by OutonaLimb
 








Based on the distance between the eyes we can safely conclude that the middle woman at least cannot be the same person as the two other women.

Make up or no make up.
edit on 7-9-2012 by BuckWilder because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 8 2012 @ 08:48 AM
link   
reply to post by BuckWilder
 




Do you concur that 'O~sama' is sporting some sort of
latex prosthetic face make-up or disguise?
(I have pointed in out in red arrows for those to who it is unclear.)

Now this must mean that somebody is acting the part of 'O~sama', right?

I propose it is O~bama (who is but a 'character' himself) who had taken on the roll.
I do this for many other reasons, and not at all lightly.

Focus on the picture. Remove the disguise.
Who do you see? Then take it further to prove it or not to yourself,
if you have the mind.

*********************


I propose that this is a photo composite. The eyes are pasted in, as
appears to be the area in and around the mouth.
Doesn't the tip her nose look very similar to Lisa Fithians?





Isn't there something almost monstrous about this picture?
I believe it is because what we are seeing here is not a natural
person, but rather somebody else made-up (movie-style) to portray
a different character. They didn't get it quite right or authentic looking though.
Again the tip of her nose bears a resemblence to Lisa Fithians, IMO.

Here is Lisa Fithian's nose-tip.

I wouldn't be surprised if Lisa was just another character herself - Around the
eyes, and indeed the face itself, doesn't look quiet natural.


It doesn't even matter anyway if they are or are not the same person.
The stories these characters have been associated with have been proven faked,
up to and including the giffords staged shooting.

We are being faked to death, and very few have risen above the BS, even
though all the necessary evidence is competently elucidated and freely available.

www.cluesforum.info...



posted on Sep, 8 2012 @ 09:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by geobro
reply to post by OutonaLimb
 


yip 100% stand by what i say on the time got a lot of people to back me up on it 2 it was only when i watched the green screen expo on wellaware1 that i got the answer to how that was on the tv over here when it was not even going down in america
icke makes that claim in one of his books that a lot of people on tv look similar you would think that they were cloning people ?


I believe you geobro. But why do you think they would do that in the first place?
I think some of the answers are to be found in the link i posted to you above.
If they were messing with peoples timelines, it would serve them well to sow
similar confusions in other areas, and peolpe like yourself who report the truth, will be
laughed off and ridiculed, along with and especially any testimony of any genuine
people in New York, who would swear that the timeline and what they observed also
did not match with what and when events were reported on T.V..

They must have brodcast the footage you saw to certain specific areas in the U.K., otherwise
your experiences would be echoed far and wide.

If 9/11 was not a live event, how would they fool the people on the ground when the
events were 'scheduled' to occur?
(You will have to go through the link, if this seems confusing).

Icke might be on to something, but the simplest solution is that several people
are portraying many different characters. T.V. is about acting, afterall!
Where does Icke stand on Media Fakery, I wonder?





top topics
 
11
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join