It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The New York attorney general is investigating whether some of the nation’s biggest private equity firms have abused a tax strategy in order to slice hundreds of millions of dollars from their tax bills, according to executives with direct knowledge of the inquiry. Enlarge This Image Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg News The Washington office of the Carlyle Group, which The Carlyle Group has stated in regulatory filings that their partners have not diverted management fees into investments in their funds. Enlarge This Image Evan McGlinn for The New York Times Bain offices in Boston. According to financial statements, Bain partners saved more than $200 million in federal income taxes and more than $20 million in Medicare taxes. The attorney general, Eric T. Schneiderman, has in recent weeks subpoenaed more than a dozen firms seeking documents that would reveal whether they converted certain management fees collected from their investors into fund investments, which are taxed at a far lower rate than ordinary income. Among the firms to receive subpoenas are Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Company, TPG Capital, Sun Capital Partners, Apollo Global Management, Silver Lake Partners and Bain Capital, which was founded by Mitt Romney, the Republican nominee for president. Representatives for the firms declined to comment on the inquiry.
To be fair, it appears that, legally, this particular tax-avoidance scheme is still in the "not yet settled" phase as opposed to the "established law" phase. At some point, if the IRS concludes that the capital gains treatment is bogus, it will likely challenge it in court. And Bain and other private-equity firms will defend it.
Leavitt FoundationLeavitt's family charitable foundation, the Dixie and Anne Leavitt Foundation, was established by the Leavitt family in 2000, and the family has donated nearly $9 million of assets to it since. It has provided them with tax write-offs for the donated assets. About a third of the foundation's assets have been loaned back to family businesses, such as a $332,000 loan to Leavitt Land and Investment Inc., in which Mike Leavitt has a substantial interest. According to a 2006 National Public Radio report, these loans were legal because they were made at market rates.[5] A month following the NPR report, Congress made such transactions illegal. The same NPR report also revealed that nearly $500,000 in charitable contributions provided to the Southern Utah Foundation were used for housing scholarships to Southern Utah University. The scholarships were subsequently used to place students in the Cedar Development Co., a Leavitt family business, with the money used to pay the students' rent. NPR's investigation found that the arrangement was legal and that the Leavitts did not profit from the arrangement. Although legal, the procedure, called "round-tripping" in philanthropic circles, has garnered criticism as lacking in the spirit of philanthropy.[5] The report also stated that Mike Leavitt was not directly involved in the foundation's operations. Total charitable grants from the foundation during its first six years were $1,468,055. The foundation's principal beneficiaries have been Southern Utah University and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Other beneficiaries have included arts, educational and humanitarian organizations, including the Leavitt family genealogical society.
Legal experts continue to crawl through the massive cache of Mitt Romney's Bain fund documents that Gawker published on Thursday.
And one law professor, Victor Fleischer of the University of Colorado, believes he has found a tax-avoidance trick used by the funds that is illegal.
As expected, the Bain funds appear to have employed pretty much every sophisticated tax-dodging scheme in the book, including:
- creating "blocker" corporations that allow the funds to avoid business taxes,
- entering into credit-default swaps that allow the funds to avoid dividend taxes, and, of course,
- taking advantage of the ludicrous "carried interest" tax loophole that allows private-equity and hedge-fund managers to treat their performance fees as capital gains instead of ordinary income and thus pay a tiny fraction of the taxes on them that normal professionals would pay.
The tax strategy — which is viewed as perfectly legal by some tax experts, aggressive by others and potentially illegal by some — came to light last month when hundreds of pages of Bain’s internal financial documents were made available online. The financial statements show that at least $1 billion in accumulated fees that otherwise would have been taxed as ordinary income for Bain executives had been converted into investments producing capital gains, which are subject to a federal tax of 15 percent, versus a top rate of 35 percent for ordinary income.
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
in some cases using now-illegal schemes like "Son of BOSS", etc.
Corporate officers An officer of a corporation is generally an employee, but an officer who performs no services or only minor services, and who neither receives nor is entitled to receive any pay, is not considered an employee. Refer to "Who Are Employees?" in Publication 15-A, Employer's Supplemental Tax Guide (PDF). Partners
Treating employees as nonemployees You will be liable for social security and Medicare taxes and withheld income tax if you do not deduct and withhold them because you treat an employee as a nonemployee, including yourself if you are a corporate officer, and you may be liable for a trust fund recovery penalty. Refer to Publication 15, Circular E, Employer's Tax Guide for details about the trust fund recovery penalty or Independent Contractor for more information on employee classification.
Shareholder loan or officer's compensation? A loan by a corporation to a corporate officer should include the characteristics of a loan made at arm's length. That is, there should be a contract with a stated interest rate, a specified length of time for repayment, and a consequence for failure to repay the loan. Collateral would also be an indication of a loan. A below-market loan is a loan which provides for no interest or interest at a rate below the federal rate that applies. If a corporation issues you, as a shareholder or an employee, a below-market loan, the lender's payment to the borrower is treated as a gift, dividend, contribution to capital, payment of wages, or other payment, depending on the substance of the transaction. See "Below-market interest rate loans" under Employees' Pay / Kinds of Pay / Loans or Advances in Publication 535, Business Expenses for more information.
Reasonable compensation Because an officer of a corporation is generally an employee with wages subject to withholding, corporate officers may question what is considered reasonable compensation for the efforts they contribute to conducting their trade or business. Wages paid to you as an officer of a corporation should generally be commensurate with your duties. Refer to "Employee's Pay, Tests for Deducting Pay" in Publication 535, Business Expenses for more information. Public libraries may have reference sources that provide averages of compensation paid for various types of services. The Internal Revenue Service may determine that adjustments must be made to the income and expenses of tax returns for both the corporation and an individual shareholder if the officer is substantially underpaid for services provided.
Then why aren't the articles in the OP saying that? All they say is that someday it may be found to be illegal. If it's so basic, I'd think they'd be pointing it out.
Its basic facts what he did was illegal.
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by JBA2848
I'm just expressing my confusion here. IfThen why aren't the articles in the OP saying that? All they say is that someday it may be found to be illegal. If it's so basic, I'd think they'd be pointing it out.
Its basic facts what he did was illegal.
Originally posted by JBA2848
reply to post by charles1952
They don't do investigations for some thing that is not illegal. So why do a investigation? Because what the private equity companies are doing is illegal. They say its estimated Bain Capital itself is on the line for around 220 million dollars. And the IRS will only audit a max of 3 years. About 75 million dollars a year scam they are running.
I may very well agree with you that what they're doing is sneaky or offensive. But you've gone way ahead of me. Where does it say that it is clearly illegal? I didn't find it in the OP's links, and I haven't seen it posted. Wouldn't it be fair to wait on calling something illegal until we know that it is?
So why do a investigation? Because what the private equity companies are doing is illegal.
Originally posted by JBA2848
reply to post by charles1952
They don't do investigations for some thing that is not illegal. So why do a investigation?