It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
When the week began, and the Republican National Convention bore the unfortunate burden (again) of coinciding with a hurricane near New Orleans, some thought that it was inevitable that President Barack Obama would upstage challenger Mitt Romney--not by campaigning, but by visiting areas affected by the storm, quietly reminding voters that he is still President, and drawing an implicit comparison with George W. Bush.
Yet somehow Obama spent the week campaigning, at rallies and online, while Romney, who only yesterday accepted his party’s nomination for the job, has beaten Obama to the scene, and will visit hurricane-ravaged communities in Louisiana today, the Hill reports. Obama had all week to visit affected areas, but did not--and the media let him off the hook. (Apparently hurricanes are only policy failures if Republicans are in power.)
Unlike Sen. John McCain's clumsy and disastrous decision to "suspend his campaign" in the wake of the financial crisis of Sept. 2008, Romney's trip to New Orleans projects command, confidence and leadership.
Hours after Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney visited Louisiana in the aftermath of Hurricane Isaac on Friday, White House press secretary Jay Carney announced President Barack Obama would call an audible in his schedule and visit Louisiana on Monday to assess the storm's damage.
Originally posted by usmc0311
It's not like either of them truly care about the people affected. The only reason Romney went is for the political reason, not because he truly cares. In my opinion it is pretty dispicable to make a presence there and then play the political card by making a fuss about the other canidate not showing. If I lived in the affected area I would prefer that both of them stay the heck out and do what they do best. Smile and lie and keep the sheep entertained. Anyway, just my opinion.
Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by usmc0311
I understand you point. But I do think that Romney cares about what happened. Is it a good political moment? Yes. Obama has every chance to respond and visit and has chosen not to. It took a visit from Romney to light a fire under his ass.
Romney chose to lead by example here...
Originally posted by Kali74
Remember when everyone thought Obama was a thoughtless jerk for visiting Joplin after the devastating tornado series?
.
Originally posted by Kaploink
Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by usmc0311
I understand you point. But I do think that Romney cares about what happened. Is it a good political moment? Yes. Obama has every chance to respond and visit and has chosen not to. It took a visit from Romney to light a fire under his ass.
Romney chose to lead by example here...
If Romney had any empathy he would not have outsourced so many jobs while at Bain.
This is nothing more than a PR move.
Originally posted by sirnukeem
Originally posted by Kali74
Remember when everyone thought Obama was a thoughtless jerk for visiting Joplin after the devastating tornado series?
.
N0, every0ne was praising him, the MSM was acting like n0 0ther p0litician has ever d0ne such a great thing.
R0mney is visiting the damage, s0 0bama has t0 visit the damage. Whether we think if they are sincere 0r n0t
it will help families in the damage feel better that such **imp0rtant** pe0ple w0uld visit them. N0 harm d0ne
Originally posted by jibeho
Romney has just departed a busy convention and carved out the time to visit this damaged region to express his concerns.