Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

California going off!

page: 35
147
<< 32  33  34    36  37 >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 1 2012 @ 12:51 PM
link   
reply to post by Char-Lee
 


Where do you find the number of quakes hit?

The map I keep an eye on doesnt give a count.




posted on Sep, 1 2012 @ 01:03 PM
link   
Small quake at the Newberry Volcanic area and another link to Geothermal exploration.


Newberry Volcano has been explored as a potential source for geothermal energy for more than three decades. High temperatures have been encountered, but fluid production has been inadequate for generating power. In fall of 2012, a deep well will be the focus of an enhanced geothermal systems experiment to open fractures beneath the volcano and test whether water circulated down the hole can be heated and brought to the surface to produce energy.


We are at 645!



posted on Sep, 1 2012 @ 01:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by riverwild
reply to post by Char-Lee
 


Where do you find the number of quakes hit?

The map I keep an eye on doesnt give a count.


earthquake.usgs.gov...

right above the world map

Just look how many volcanoes we have
volcanoes.usgs.gov...
edit on 1-9-2012 by Char-Lee because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 1 2012 @ 01:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by pjazeg
reply to post by pjazeg
 

what are the odds that 79% of the world's earthquakes happen on



posted on Sep, 1 2012 @ 01:32 PM
link   
reply to post by Char-Lee
 


Thanks Char-Lee


5.1 & 5.3 just happened in Chiapas, Mexico.

Quakes are very active today.

Anyone think it may have to do with the full moon?



posted on Sep, 1 2012 @ 01:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by Char-Lee



Just look how many volcanoes we have
volcanoes.usgs.gov...
edit on 1-9-2012 by Char-Lee because: (no reason given)


WOW!!!!

I've never checked out the volcanoes. I had no idea there were that many.



posted on Sep, 1 2012 @ 02:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by MamaJ
I'm not so sure it's going to slow down but it seems after the full moon is in action we do, I know probably only makes sense to me as I just woke up.

I say we probably get to at least 750 by 4:00.

It's been unusually active but chances for another mag 7 seem out of the question so I'm going with the challenge there will be another mag 6.5+ today.



650 at 12.30 pacific time.



posted on Sep, 1 2012 @ 06:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by wasobservingquietly

I don't think it will happen this time.

It seems to be slowing down some.....26 are going to drop off tomorrow, so we would need 118 more.
If we wouldn't get that many tomorrow, something like 147 are going to drop off on Sunday.
Unless we have another good swarm somewhere, I don't think we can catch up!

But what do I know...it's almost 1 AM here & I am really tired!!!
WOQ


Still going up but Yeah slowed way down
656 at 4.44 PM pacific coast
edit on 1-9-2012 by Char-Lee because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 1 2012 @ 10:22 PM
link   
670 now, was 671 ten minutes ago though.



posted on Sep, 1 2012 @ 11:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by rickymouse
670 now, was 671 ten minutes ago though.

675 9.30 PM Pacific slowing but still going up! I think my 700 my tomorrow evening will make it!!

In actuality if you look at the top left of this map and set to all there is


2277 earthquakes
All events in the past 7 days

earthquake.usgs.gov...



posted on Sep, 1 2012 @ 11:47 PM
link   
hi! sorry i have a newbie a question but can't seem to start a topic. so hope its ok to ask here.

what has been the strongest M quake in california in the past month (aug)?

thanks!



posted on Sep, 2 2012 @ 07:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by minnow
hi! sorry i have a newbie a question but can't seem to start a topic. so hope its ok to ask here.

what has been the strongest M quake in california in the past month (aug)?

thanks!


I think the largest measuring magnitude 5.5 and 5.3 (M5.5 and M5.3) rocked Southern California on August 26, 2012.

decodedscience.com...

Someone correct me if I'm wrong.



posted on Sep, 2 2012 @ 08:32 AM
link   
At 692 now.

I think my guess of 724 by 4:00pm today will be beat, unless we have a quiet day.

Whoever it was that guessed 750, may be the winner!



posted on Sep, 2 2012 @ 09:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by riverwild
At 692 now.

I think my guess of 724 by 4:00pm today will be beat, unless we have a quiet day.

Whoever it was that guessed 750, may be the winner!


698 now good morning:-)



posted on Sep, 2 2012 @ 09:19 AM
link   
reply to post by Char-Lee
 


It's increasing so slow because of dropoffs that it probably will hit seven hundred after twelve. Rats.

We seem to have different bets going on here, Mine is for time of 700 while others are using seven fifties and seven fourties with times. I guess we need to be more specific. I guess my 9-12 was also to vague as was your afternoon. Almost have to have a set time which is based on the time as viewed on the ATS site's recorded timestamp because of differences in timezones also. Why do things have to get so complicated?
edit on 2-9-2012 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 2 2012 @ 09:54 AM
link   
reply to post by rickymouse
 

I wonder how long it will increase! What if it never stops!



posted on Sep, 2 2012 @ 10:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by Char-Lee

Originally posted by riverwild
At 692 now.

I think my guess of 724 by 4:00pm today will be beat, unless we have a quiet day.

Whoever it was that guessed 750, may be the winner!


698 now good morning:-)


Good morning Char-Lee


What was your guess?



posted on Sep, 2 2012 @ 10:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by Char-Lee
 


It's increasing so slow because of dropoffs that it probably will hit seven hundred after twelve. Rats.

We seem to have different bets going on here, Mine is for time of 700 while others are using seven fifties and seven fourties with times. I guess we need to be more specific. I guess my 9-12 was also to vague as was your afternoon. Almost have to have a set time which is based on the time as viewed on the ATS site's recorded timestamp because of differences in timezones also. Why do things have to get so complicated?
edit on 2-9-2012 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)


My bet was 724 at 4:00pm. Guess we will have to go with Pacific time


I may have had a chance at it if we went with EST.

Does anyone want to pick a new time?



posted on Sep, 2 2012 @ 10:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by Char-Lee

Originally posted by riverwild
At 692 now.

I think my guess of 724 by 4:00pm today will be beat, unless we have a quiet day.

Whoever it was that guessed 750, may be the winner!


698 now good morning:-)


Can anyone explain this??????

Just checked and it went down to 687.

earthquake.usgs.gov...



posted on Sep, 2 2012 @ 11:09 AM
link   
reply to post by Char-Lee
 


Well, I didn't see it reach seven hundred this morning. I saw 699 and it went down since then. It may have hit seven hundred for a little while when I wasn't looking but I can't say I saw it. Good luck, I'll give you a star if you see it hits seven hours this afternoon. If anyone else meets their estimates and says so I'll give them a star also.






top topics



 
147
<< 32  33  34    36  37 >>

log in

join